Deleted member 36465
Currycel
-
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2021
- Posts
- 1,405
I think currently there are two schools of thought in the blackpill community, the chad school and the oofy doofy school. The chad school is probably more mainstream. This school of thought asserts that conventionally attractive men are more likely to have success with sex and romantic relationships.
Then you have the oofy doofy school, which asserts that ugly to average looking men have more success in relationships, provided they are NT and outgoing enough, because women feel like they can control them more.
I personally subscribe to the oofy doofy school of thought, because I think the power women hold over an oofy doofy is more appealing to women than the "tingles" a chad provides.
MOD EDIT: We've been seeing a lot of these "oofy doofy" threads lately and are holding discussions on whether or not they will continue to be allowed, as they seem to just be repackaged bluepill (aka betabux alphafux).
Then you have the oofy doofy school, which asserts that ugly to average looking men have more success in relationships, provided they are NT and outgoing enough, because women feel like they can control them more.
I personally subscribe to the oofy doofy school of thought, because I think the power women hold over an oofy doofy is more appealing to women than the "tingles" a chad provides.
MOD EDIT: We've been seeing a lot of these "oofy doofy" threads lately and are holding discussions on whether or not they will continue to be allowed, as they seem to just be repackaged bluepill (aka betabux alphafux).
Last edited by a moderator: