Serious Chad isn't your ally: He's the only reason women have rights

[Deleted member 2047]

Reminder that women don't "have rights", Chad (who runs the world) simply refuses to enforce the natural order. To have rights, you need some way to secure those rights. However, women having rights is completely dependent on if men choose to exert their will or not, women really don't have a say in the matter.

So why don't incels just all collectively decide to stop allowing women do as they please? Because Chad has a vested interest in giving women free choice over their partners. As we all know, sexual freedom is a zero sum game. The more freedom women have, the less freedom men have, and vice versa. Marriage was invented 100% so sub8s could get laid once in while.

But at some point, the Chad establishment (banks, businesses, police, etc) decided to allow women to do as they please, meaning women starting breaking off from their sub8 partners and slowly congregating around Chad. Chad already had the best women, but now he would have ALL women.

Reminder: Women's rights could disappear TOMORROW if men collectively decided enough is enough. Women don't have the ability to resist us (evidenced by the fact we were in control in the past), but Chad is actively using institutions of government, racism, oppression, etc to stop YOU from having your natural right.

 

[EyesAreSoCold]

There's plenty of Chads who is against feminism and women's rights though, idk if those in control are all chads and are doing it explicitly to further their sexual success. But besides that you're right. Rights are given by the government which is the collective power of all men in that country.

"Women don't owe you sex" loses its power immediately when people get blackpilled and see how much we're helping out women for free.

 

[Deleted member 2047]

There's plenty of Chads who is against feminism and women's rights though, idk if those in control are all chads and are doing it explicitly to further their sexual success. But besides that you're right. Rights are given by the government which is the collective power of all men in that country.

"Women don't owe you sex" loses its power immediately when people get blackpilled and see how much we're helping out women for free.

The thing about institutional oppression is that its done whether they realize it or not. Privilege works like that.

 

[Deleted member 22571]

Dogs should have more rights than women, they're way more useful to society than women are.

 

[DarwinsDisgrace]

There's plenty of Chads who is against feminism and women's rights though, idk if those in control are all chads and are doing it explicitly to further their sexual success. But besides that you're right. Rights are given by the government which is the collective power of all men in that country.

"Women don't owe you sex" loses its power immediately when people get blackpilled and see how much we're helping out women for free.

Election happening in Britain at the moment - I was watching TV and see a panel of ordinary people. Single mother with 5 kids, another single mother with 2 kids working as an estate agent (what qualifies a person to be an estate agent I wonder?) woman who is 60 who lost her job, can't get another one apparently and is living off benefits, all these women were quite content when the experts reassured them that every party will stuff their fat faces with money from hardworking people (men). I should mention the other two women, one was a business owner employing only staff on min wage, so was unsurprisingly butthurt that every party will raise min wage (funny how women give a shit about socialism when they stand to lose from it) and the other, a 19 year old working at a salon, wanted to know how the government will help her buy a house.

Sure, women don't owe anyone sex, but they aren't owed a lifestyle raising kids all day if they can't afford it, they aren't owed equal pay, employment quotas, programmes to encourage them into certain industries etc.

 

[EyesAreSoCold]

The thing about institutional oppression is that its done whether they realize it or not. Privilege works like that.

Ye but it can only change once people realize it. Nobody likes being screwed over(except for cucks).

 

[grondilu]

Very true. To get rights, men revolt and fight.

To get rights, women nag men to death.

 

[Sheogorath]

Reminder that women don't "have rights", Chad (who runs the world) simply refuses to enforce the natural order.

There's no such thing as any kind of inherent 'rights' for anyone, the concept is always an artificial invention.

That said: artifice is a result of man's natural inclination toward invention and organization, so artifice (such as rights) are always part of the 'natural order'.

You could view it as "against the natural order" to stitch up a cut so a man doesn't bleed to death, but medicine is part of the natural order because it's invention is a natural result of man's ingenuity and inventiveness.

To have rights, you need some way to secure those rights.
However, women having rights is completely dependent on if men choose to exert their will or not,
women really don't have a say in the matter.

You can say exactly the same about weak men who would get the shit beaten out of them by Chad.
That they exist at the mercy of systemic cooperation designed to protect them.

So why don't incels just all collectively decide to stop allowing women do as they please?
Because Chad has a vested interest in giving women free choice over their partners.

I think you are having some short-sighted tunnel vision here OP.
Chad isn't the only vested interest here.
Women have a vested interest in this too, and they are master manipulators of men's emotions.
Also, since weak men collectively agree on the importance of autonomy and consent (ie that it is wrong for a big muscular guy to just go around punching thin guys and taking their sandwiches... they should go to jail for doing that) they also collectively agreed to give women protections against assault/mugging too.

This extends to assaults of a sexual nature. A society might enforce punishments against women who engage in certain sexual acts, but that wouldn't necessarily lead to sexual success.

It sounds like what you might be getting at is that women would be more likely to give out sex in exchange for financial/security benefits if they had to do this because of fewer opportunities to secure that money/safety for themselves without trading sex for it?

As we all know, sexual freedom is a zero sum game.
The more freedom women have, the less freedom men have, and vice versa.
Marriage was invented 100% so sub8s could get laid once in while.

Sub8s could get laid if they were rapists, marriage simply restored a non-rape pathway to pussy in an age where rape was outlawed.

But at some point, the Chad establishment (banks, businesses, police, etc) decided to allow women to do as they please,
meaning women starting breaking off from their sub8 partners and slowly congregating around Chad.
Chad already had the best women, but now he would have ALL women.

Chad could never have done that alone. You have to keep in mind that these movements were led by thirsty white knights who were hoping that women would be grateful for the gift of freedom/autonomy and give sexual rewards for that morality.

IE women's suffrage was led by IncelTears.

Reminder: Women's rights could disappear TOMORROW if men collectively decided enough is enough. Women don't have the ability to resist us (evidenced by the fact we were in control in the past), but Chad is actively using institutions of government, racism, oppression, etc to stop YOU from having your natural right.

It's not just Chad. If you think Chads are some solitary lynchpin here, you're sorely mistaken. Tunnel vision.

There are plenty of coping betas, thirsty friendzoned guys who pedestal women who cuck them, helping to hold all this up.

Also: please be more specific about what 'rights' you are wanting to disappear here. You're being kinda vague.

What specific legal changes were you desiring here? Tell me how you would gradually optimize society.

 

[randomguy1235]

Reminder that women don't "have rights", Chad (who runs the world) simply refuses to enforce the natural order. To have rights, you need some way to secure those rights. However, women having rights is completely dependent on if men choose to exert their will or not, women really don't have a say in the matter.

So why don't incels just all collectively decide to stop allowing women do as they please? Because Chad has a vested interest in giving women free choice over their partners. As we all know, sexual freedom is a zero sum game. The more freedom women have, the less freedom men have, and vice versa. Marriage was invented 100% so sub8s could get laid once in while.

But at some point, the Chad establishment (banks, businesses, police, etc) decided to allow women to do as they please, meaning women starting breaking off from their sub8 partners and slowly congregating around Chad. Chad already had the best women, but now he would have ALL women.

Reminder: Women's rights could disappear TOMORROW if men collectively decided enough is enough. Women don't have the ability to resist us (evidenced by the fact we were in control in the past), but Chad is actively using institutions of government, racism, oppression, etc to stop YOU from having your natural right.

Nice deflection there (((buddy))). No, it was Jews who were responsible. Their Anglo pawns were only enablers

 

[Vermilioncore]

Fuck Chad tbh

 

[Deleted member 22907]

Fuck Chad

Stacy said the same thing

 

[TINMAN]

This is true if you replace the word "Chad" with "Cucks". Chad is just a fucking machine, maybe a few are slightly self aware, but it doesn't stop them from following their instincts. Cucks are the ones who throw all of their resources at women, twist society's laws to favor women, side with women regardless of the situation... The problem with them is their sheer numbers, 4 billion men in the world and at least 1 billion of them are cucks.

 

[Mainländer]

The elites that run the world are Chads now? David Rothschild and his fellows are Chads?

This is true if you replace the word "Chad" with "Cucks"

This. The men who gave rights to women and let things get this bad were cucks, not Chads. The occasional Chad maybe was among them, but statistically, it wasn't Chads.

 

[NoCopeNoHope]

Chads only make up 5% of global male population. Chadlites 15% or so. Chads have little say in what happens. Do attractive people tend to have money and power? Yes. But that is because cucks and foids give them that money and power.

Cucks and white knights are the reason women are free today. They make up about 65% of the global male population and are what support the system as it exists. Foids also play a role ofc. So in total you have a plurality of the male population and about 95% of foids that support women's rights to breed as they want to. The only way forward is to radically change the game.

Reminder that foid liberation only happen about 100 years ago. We are just now starting to feel its effects.