Are there any mathcels here that can sufficiently describe these phenomenons in a mathematical model?
Both follow same distribution patterns, ie rich get richer and chads get more and more women. I suspect that would be the case for all merit based systems. What I am most interested in is why the difference seems to be exponential and not linear. 10/10 chad doesnt get twice as much as 5/10, you could probably cube that number and it wouldnt be enough. (yes i am aware of x/10 ratings not having any mathematical basis, my point is small differences cause seemingly exponential impact)
The most hilarious thing that comes out of this all is that in these mathematical models women aren't rational agents
merely a static resource.
In fact them following same distribution pattern as money is in itself fucking hilarious.
Both follow same distribution patterns, ie rich get richer and chads get more and more women. I suspect that would be the case for all merit based systems. What I am most interested in is why the difference seems to be exponential and not linear. 10/10 chad doesnt get twice as much as 5/10, you could probably cube that number and it wouldnt be enough. (yes i am aware of x/10 ratings not having any mathematical basis, my point is small differences cause seemingly exponential impact)
The most hilarious thing that comes out of this all is that in these mathematical models women aren't rational agents
merely a static resource.In fact them following same distribution pattern as money is in itself fucking hilarious.
