I’m sure that tons of people smarter than me wrote on this, but I wouldn’t mind engaging in a discussion here.
Here’s what I find true:
Similarities.
1) Predetermined success.
The easiest way to become rich is to be born rich. Outside of that, your earning ability is defined by your genetics and early upbringing – many high paying positions are walled off if you don’t have the proper intelligence, physique, looks, background.
Social mobility is real, but your chances are equally limited – if anything, class ascension is harder than having something as trivial as sex.
Hopefully, I don’t have to explain to you how inceldom is not something that you can choose.
2) Huge overlap in issues and dynamics.
The second point dubs the first quite a bit, but I think it’s worth pointing out how we might as well be talking about the same thing – because we do, it’s the society. Men and the proletariat, incels and the marginalized – the lines here are extremely blurry, the Venn diagram is essentially a circle.
3) The way systems defend themselves.
Capitalism has many defenders: the police, the media, the academia, the MIC, the professional-managerial class etc. Even the weird online people who fashion themselves conservative, libertarian, liberal or whatever else are all on it as well.
Most of the parties listed above defend the hypergamy too, and they even use the same arguments: according to them, you should “pull yourself up by your bootstraps”, “chin up”, “stop blaming others for your own failures”. That’s as bluepilled as it gets.
4) The Resistance.
Many governments claim to be socialist, or at least social democratic, but they all engage in capitalism in one way or the other, similarly to how many socially conservative countries are seen as “patriarchal”, but still grant women enormous privileges and don’t clamp down on sex liberation.
Many anti-capitalist groups mostly function as social clubs, merely allowing their members to vent their frustrations with the system. Does that remind you of anything?
Differences (or self-critique).
Sex having is a more drastic cut-off than class. You can be relatively well-off, but you can’t be a “little bit” incel. You either are or you’re not.
Incels, though not all, can still moneymaxx.
Lots of women are considered working class and still have to work for the living (on easy mode though).
Also, tons of marginalized people still manage to have sex, inceldom is a lot more complex than not fitting in the society.
Politically speaking, normie right-wingers are more sympathetic to incels, and vice versa. I guess it has something to do with the fact that political camps are full of brain-dead intellectually inconsistent people suffering from cognitive dissonance. Partisan politics are just a tool of control, at the end of the day.
Race factors quite a bit in both inceldom and poverty, but I didn't think of the way that I could write about it.
Here’s what I find true:
Similarities.
1) Predetermined success.
The easiest way to become rich is to be born rich. Outside of that, your earning ability is defined by your genetics and early upbringing – many high paying positions are walled off if you don’t have the proper intelligence, physique, looks, background.
Social mobility is real, but your chances are equally limited – if anything, class ascension is harder than having something as trivial as sex.
Hopefully, I don’t have to explain to you how inceldom is not something that you can choose.
2) Huge overlap in issues and dynamics.
The second point dubs the first quite a bit, but I think it’s worth pointing out how we might as well be talking about the same thing – because we do, it’s the society. Men and the proletariat, incels and the marginalized – the lines here are extremely blurry, the Venn diagram is essentially a circle.
3) The way systems defend themselves.
Capitalism has many defenders: the police, the media, the academia, the MIC, the professional-managerial class etc. Even the weird online people who fashion themselves conservative, libertarian, liberal or whatever else are all on it as well.
Most of the parties listed above defend the hypergamy too, and they even use the same arguments: according to them, you should “pull yourself up by your bootstraps”, “chin up”, “stop blaming others for your own failures”. That’s as bluepilled as it gets.
4) The Resistance.
Many governments claim to be socialist, or at least social democratic, but they all engage in capitalism in one way or the other, similarly to how many socially conservative countries are seen as “patriarchal”, but still grant women enormous privileges and don’t clamp down on sex liberation.
Many anti-capitalist groups mostly function as social clubs, merely allowing their members to vent their frustrations with the system. Does that remind you of anything?
Differences (or self-critique).
Sex having is a more drastic cut-off than class. You can be relatively well-off, but you can’t be a “little bit” incel. You either are or you’re not.
Incels, though not all, can still moneymaxx.
Lots of women are considered working class and still have to work for the living (on easy mode though).
Also, tons of marginalized people still manage to have sex, inceldom is a lot more complex than not fitting in the society.
Politically speaking, normie right-wingers are more sympathetic to incels, and vice versa. I guess it has something to do with the fact that political camps are full of brain-dead intellectually inconsistent people suffering from cognitive dissonance. Partisan politics are just a tool of control, at the end of the day.
Race factors quite a bit in both inceldom and poverty, but I didn't think of the way that I could write about it.
