Capitalism and Prostitution #2

[Caesercel]

This is in continuation of my previous thread

Thots on capitalism and prostitution (long post)

There's a famous saying that goes "Everyone's a whore. We just sell different parts of ourselves" . This sentiment is oft repeated in hollyjew media with the usual context being exonerating whores from their ugly profession. But it got me pondering about the truth in this. Are people who work...

incels.is

Often one can see and read a lot of male bitching and moaning on the internet about how easy it is in life for women. Mostly directed towards OF models who make decent money being whores.

But this raises the question, would these males work this trade if it was possible for them to be paid comparable incomes in the market. The question is valid since the anger is not usually directed at the ethical vileness of the act itself but at the income disparity it promotes. (which is strange , considering that many of these men do not question the same economic disparity between the Capitalist class and the working class)

Here the ambivalence towards the ethical repercussions of prostitution could be explained by the "whore ethics" which Capitalism insists upon.

"thus realising the absurd fable of Menenius Agrippa, which presents man as a fragment of his own body" -Karl Marx

Sounds a lot like a foid reducing herself to nothing but the hole between her legs.

The other angle is that many men barely make enough under capitalism. It's a constant race just to pay bills and put a roof on their heads. Under such conditions it's understandable if they embrace "whore ethics" as a means of survival and thus a source of envy. Sure wage labour may not have the ethical ramifications of selling your body for sex, but it's a similar kind of degrading work. Then one can understand the impulse to abandon all dignity and make money out of selling dick pics, if one can.

 

[Lonelyus]

In my country its legal to sell but not buy, What the fuck?

 

[Allah (Real)]

The question is valid since the anger is not usually directed at the ethical vileness of the act itself but at the income disparity it promotes. (which is strange , considering that many of these men do not question the same economic disparity between the Capitalist class and the working class)

It comes from a place of ressentiment and the bourgeoisie plays on that. They want you to be mad that somebody has a higher salary than you instead of directing your ressentiment against them.

 

[Caesercel]

In my country its legal to sell but not buy, What the fuck?

That's just feminism. They think it's an oppressive institution on principle, not on any patriarchic moral grounds (or common sense as we call it). Born of the idea that most women who do this are trafficked or forced into it. The contradiction here is that it also lumps in those who choose to do it for subsistence. Then feminists would cry oppression since no one should have to do this for money. But since this view cannot be derived from patriarchy, and cannot be vindicated in capitalism, it must be grounded in Marxism.

Thus revealing the marxist feminist hypocrisy of living in a capitalist, wageslavery based society

 

[slavcel11]

I despise e-whores for these reasons:
- they sell love/affection. This is cucked, because it's supposed to be free (reason: I said so)
- not only do foids "just" sell love and affection, it's clear they are able to do it at all solely because they have hole. That is, foids get paid not for real work but for their existence, essentially for being foids
- they become rich by doing so little, for them it's even easier than taking shit, why of course I would hate them
- feminists still will call that oppression my ass