Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Can you blame genetics for being incel?

Kiewgha

Kiewgha

Greycel
Joined
Feb 5, 2024
Posts
52
not that I know much about topic of “genetics” but Im under the impression that catastrophic subhuman genes would be exceptionally rare, and that the failure of genetic expression is what causes deformities. That is in most cases negligence/ignorance from the parents or some environmental disturbance from the age of conception until the end of toddler age is when your fate is mostly decided

So genes have become a catch all excuse instead of just calling it determinism? Nevertheless I think its faire to just blame your parents for everything because its more convenient
 
I blame my genetics some but the societal issues are as much or more of a factor
 
I blame my genetics some but the societal issues are as much or more of a factor
Yes. Sadly no one needs ugly men anymore, for anything. they can just make you their slave without having to interact ever
 
Is this a real post? Did I just read what I just read? GrAYs are something else, mang.
 
under the impression that catastrophic subhuman genes would be exceptionally rare
They are very rare, and most people here don't have them. The issue stems from the fact that you don't need catastrophically subhuman traits to still be an incel. Would you call a 5'9 low MTN catastrophically subhuman? I don't think so, yet he would still be an incel (lots of people in this exact situation on this forum,) and they all have a right to blame genetics, because that's simply what it is.
and that the failure of genetic expression is what causes deformities
Wouldn't matter anyway. It would only be important if you had the genetic potential of HTN+ in the first place.
 
Your parents are the one who gave you your genetics, duh
 
yes, yes i can blame genetics
 
They are very rare, and most people here don't have them. The issue stems from the fact that you don't need catastrophically subhuman traits to still be an incel. Would you call a 5'9 low MTN catastrophically subhuman? I don't think so, yet he would still be an incel (lots of people in this exact situation on this forum,) and they all have a right to blame genetics, because that's simply what it is.

Wouldn't matter anyway. It would only be important if you had the genetic potential of HTN+ in the first place.
For sake of argument I include subpar or whatever will qualify also exceptionally rare. Vast majority people do not develop properly in gestation what does it have to do with genes and not just ignorant parents etc. Also early childhood matters a lot for development. Thats why I say why dont just call it determinism because obviously you had no say here instead of using genes meme
 
Last edited:
problem is that foids have an insane standard when comes to the genes that they are attracted to.
you are ugly? rejected.
you are not ugly but short? rejected.
you are not ugly or short but look like normie? rejected.
you are not ugly, not short, better than normie but have a small dick? rejected.
none of these things are possible to change you are either born like that or you are not.
 
For sake of argument I include subpar or whatever will qualify also exceptionally rare. Vast majority people do not develop properly in gestation what does it have to do with genes and not just ignorant parents etc. Also early childhood matters a lot for development. Thats why I say why dont just call it determinism because obviously you had no say here instead of using genes meme
Yeh, I mostly agree on this, but take into account the fact that there are chads, chadlites, and HTNS that still reached that level even with fetal malnutrition. What I'm getting at is that if you had elite genetics, they would still shine (given dimmer) in spite of this.
 
catastrophic subhuman genes would be exceptionally rare, and that the failure of genetic expression is what causes deformities.
Societal standards of attractiveness and performance so high now that you don't have to be catastrophically subhuman to be an incel. You can be sub 5 or 6, and that'll be enough to make you incel.
 
problem is that foids have an insane standard when comes to the genes that they are attracted to.
you are ugly? rejected.
you are not ugly but short? rejected.
you are not ugly or short but look like normie? rejected.
you are not ugly, not short, better than normie but have a small dick? rejected.
none of these things are possible to change you are either born like that or you are not.
:yes: :yes: :yes:
 
yes, yes i can blame genetics
problem is that foids have an insane standard when comes to the genes that they are attracted to.
you are ugly? rejected.
you are not ugly but short? rejected.
you are not ugly or short but look like normie? rejected.
you are not ugly, not short, better than normie but have a small dick? rejected.
none of these things are possible to change you are either born like that or you are not.
I blame my genetics some but the societal issues are as much or more of a factor
We developed so rapidly that our standards increased too quickly for average men to keep up and stay afloat. Its like the software industry where there's a ground-breaking computer science paradigm every couple of years which leaves workers with no room to breathe.
 
In my case yes, 90%. Genetics are the cause im extremely short and that my parents were completely crazy. My asymmetric face, i dont know if its genetics to blame.
 

Similar threads

I
Replies
8
Views
316
Mistake
M
S
Replies
10
Views
838
DutchCel01
DutchCel01
antisocialcel
Replies
4
Views
567
starystulejarz
starystulejarz
KingOfInceldia
Replies
35
Views
1K
LifeMaxxer
L

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top