Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Can we make a SMV calculator dependent on height | face | race | frame?

A

Apucel

Banned
-
Joined
Jul 26, 2018
Posts
188
A calculator to determine in what percentile for overall SMV you belong.
That would kill the whole face | height | race fight and instead take all factors into account to determine your total SMV.
 
That would require tinder experiments and irl approaches using thousands of different comibnations of face/height/frame/race.
 
I’m actually on it. I am interested in the ideas of other incels. Please submit a mathematical equation on how you think it is calculated
 
Want to see this too
 
its fucking pointless there are way too many factors to make an accurate SMV calculator.
 
That would require tinder experiments and irl approaches using thousands of different comibnations of face/height/frame/race.
Pretty much.
The IRL experiments will be hard to determine, but we should be able to get a rough estimation using Tinder experiments.
 
Any programmercels here?
 
I could do this.

One thing people need to realize about ratings is that the scale is non-linear. For example: Being 5'3" is exponentially worse than being 5'6", which is worse than being 5'9". Even though both intervals are 3", the impact from 5'3" to 5'6" is way worse than 5'6" to 5'9".
 
I’m actually on it. I am interested in the ideas of other incels. Please submit a mathematical equation on how you think it is calculated
Yes, I know it. But there isn't enough space over here, kek.
 
Any programmercels here?
I am, but we need more data.
We need to make Tinder experiments. Preferably controlling for things like photo quality, photo frames, location, etc.

It is rough, but it should be doable.
The OkCupid analysis which have already been made probably are the best ones, but what I've seen they haven't done much on face and height, just race?
 
I could do this.

One thing people need to realize about ratings is that the scale is non-linear. For example: Being 5'3" is exponentially worse than being 5'6", which is worse than being 5'9". Even though both intervals are 3", the impact from 5'3" to 5'6" is way worse than 5'6" to 5'9".
What data do we have to determine this?
 
It would be too hard to do, people usually over rate their faces, but height is easy to measure, face isn’t.
 
Good idea, keep adding factors and ask people for factors and advice etc. Blackpill archive has most of the data for it
It would be too hard to do, people usually over rate their faces, but height is easy to measure, face isn’t.
Also it's about harmony, long midface can be a plus sometimes, so is big nose
 
I could do this.

One thing people need to realize about ratings is that the scale is non-linear. For example: Being 5'3" is exponentially worse than being 5'6", which is worse than being 5'9". Even though both intervals are 3", the impact from 5'3" to 5'6" is way worse than 5'6" to 5'9".

got it the other way round. 5'6 is already blatant manlet so going from 5'6 to 5'3 isnt too bad of a downgrade besides being height mogged by most foids. 5'6 to 5'9 on the other hand is from blatant manlet to almost average where you will usually be taken seriously.
 
The thing about Data: I think we can start a strawpoll/surveymonkey and let incels decide. Observable reality can be enough. We need some foundation of an equation. When new Data is available we can change certain parameters
 
Yes, we can, just compare facial ratings depending on bones position to height and frame measurements to determine correctly. Hard, but possible.
 
The thing about Data: I think we can start a strawpoll/surveymonkey and let incels decide. Observable reality can be enough. We need some foundation of an equation. When new Data is available we can change certain parameters
that link i posted is good and concise

if you get over a 0 you're a normie simple as that tbh

I got -16/10 so I know it's legit.
 
What data did they use to determine the scoring system?
Upon my first look it does not look legit at all. What the fuck does even -19/10 mean?
What percentile of SMV does that put you in?

Well its just arbitrary units. I'm probably bottom 1% for physical smv. If you want to recalibrate it to percentiles you'd need to roughly approximate how scores relate to percentiles.

Ie. -20 = bottom 1%
-3-5 = average
0 = top 30%
5+ = top few percent
 
Well its just arbitrary units. I'm probably bottom 1% for physical smv. If you want to recalibrate it to percentiles you'd need to roughly approximate how scores relate to percentiles.

Ie. -20 = bottom 1%
-3-5 = average
0 = top 30%
5+ = top few percent
In that thread there were several "incels" in the top few percent.
My gut feeling is that the rating done is 100 % broscience.

What type of data did he use to determine the scoring system?
 
In that thread there were several "incels" in the top few percent.
My gut feeling is that the rating done is 100 % broscience.

What type of data did he use to determine the scoring system?

How could you get data? Basically he just went through every feature of the face and assigned a 0-2 positive score if you have the ideal structure, and a 1-3 negative score of you have the unideal structure.

The fact that several "incels" were in the top percent is to be expected. Every incel community is always highly populated by very attractive men who come here for their own reasons. Some are lazy and never made an effort with women. Some are "too anxious". Some just want a self esteem boost.

If you ever saw people's pictures on /r9k/ or PSL sites or even here in the rating thread you'd know we always get some extremely good looking people here.

It's pretty much impossible to score highly on that test and be physically unattractive. Scoring highly if done legitimately basically proves you have no identifiable physical flaws.

Percentiles could be standardized using our responses for the lower range. Eg. I have the record low score so it probably doesn't go lower for most people than -20. And on the high end you can score some male models. Pretty sure they'll land in the 5-10 positive range which then establishes the top percentile.
 
How could you get data? Basically he just went through every feature of the face and assigned a 0-2 positive score if you have the ideal structure, and a 1-3 negative score of you have the unideal structure.

The fact that several "incels" were in the top percent is to be expected. Every incel community is always highly populated by very attractive men who come here for their own reasons. Some are lazy and never made an effort with women. Some are "too anxious". Some just want a self esteem boost.

If you ever saw people's pictures on /r9k/ or PSL sites or even here in the rating thread you'd know we always get some extremely good looking people here.

It's pretty much impossible to score highly on that test and be physically unattractive. Scoring highly if done legitimately basically proves you have no identifiable physical flaws.

Percentiles could be standardized using our responses for the lower range. Eg. I have the record low score so it probably doesn't go lower for most people than -20. And on the high end you can score some male models. Pretty sure they'll land in the 5-10 positive range which then establishes the top percentile.
they could just be noobs to PLS talk also
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top