I mean they're like two products with wildly different demand but equal supply. How much more valuable is pussy mathematically speaking? Could one calculate an estimate of this using Tinder-data?
Your tiny whiny cock is useless math are not needed for that any pussy have more smv than this forum and the whole India combined.
@Betrayed Are you up to it? 
My mathematical ability is not high or developed enough to process such things, but we certainly know the value of the foid would be much higher; also note that the supply of foids is slightly higher than males, at least according to statistics that could easily be undershooting it, either because of normal error, or a purposeful attempt to delude downtrodden men into believing there are still "plenty of fish".
My mathematical ability is not high or developed enough to process such things, but we certainly know the value of the foid would be much higher; also note that the supply of foids is slightly higher than males, at least according to statistics that could easily be undershooting it, either because of normal error, or a purposeful attempt to delude downtrodden men into believing there are still "plenty of fish".
M
supply of foid is elderly foids.@Betrayed Are you up to it?
My mathematical ability is not high or developed enough to process such things, but we certainly know the value of the foid would be much higher; also note that the supply of foids is slightly higher than males, at least according to statistics that could easily be undershooting it, either because of normal error, or a purposeful attempt to delude downtrodden men into believing there are still "plenty of fish".
17 times more valuable. About 95:1. 80/20 Tinder is cope.
psmag.com
8,000 Years Ago, 17 Women Reproduced for Every One Man
An analysis of modern DNA uncovers a rough dating scene after the advent of agriculture.
psmag.com
Holy shit17 times more valuable. About 95:1. 80/20 Tinder is cope.
8,000 Years Ago, 17 Women Reproduced for Every One Man
An analysis of modern DNA uncovers a rough dating scene after the advent of agriculture.
This is something easily accomplished with Google.
Genetic cognitive ability also contributes to general understanding of such abstract concepts, though; I guess you're right in relation to simpler mathematical constructs.
Value of pussy is infinite value of dick depends on facial looks@Betrayed Are you up to it?
My mathematical ability is not high or developed enough to process such things, but we certainly know the value of the foid would be much higher; also note that the supply of foids is slightly higher than males, at least according to statistics that could easily be undershooting it, either because of normal error, or a purposeful attempt to delude downtrodden men into believing there are still "plenty of fish".
The biggest cock is worth less than the worst pussy
I’m not a mathcel so can’t quantify, but I know that pussy has value in a vacuum, like in and of itself. The value of men is only relative to the other men around. I.e. almost all women are attractive/breedable to almost all men, but not the other way around.
This is not mathematics, it is economics.
The calculation of how X is valuable in terms of Y is made by comparing the amount (of money, time, energy etc.) exchanged for all X that is consumed (contracted, demanded, requested etc.) and the amount (of money, time, energy etc.) exchanged for all Y that is consumed.
Your average male spends 95% of his disposable time working (i.e.: 95% of his time not sleeping, shitting, eating, brushing teeth, showering etc. is spent at work; or in qualifying for a job, such as: education and training; or in the preparation for the work day, such as: grooming, commute, car maintenance, ironing clothes etc. and then in the recovery from the rigors and stress faced at work, such as gabbing a beed in the local pub, or relaxing in the couch). He then spends 80% of his income to maintain "wife and kids" (who are possibly not even his kids) and the remainder 20% for work-related expenses (car, gas, insurance, clothes, and his own survival and nutrition counts 95% as a work-related expense, since 95% of his time is spent as a working asset for the benefit of the foid, her kids, and his employer).
Your average foid spends 95 seconds downloading tinder and swiping before she finds such a man to slave away his life for the benefit of herself and her kids (that maybe she'll try and convince him are his too). And then she waits 20 seconds after he leaves for work to cuck him with a guy from Ashley Madison or whatnot. She probably doesn't do any hard chores (besides pushing buttons), doesn't contribute financially to the household (not anywhere close to however much she demands), and doesn't even raise her own offspring (sends them to daycare). Her whole effort in this relationship is very close to zero, and she feels entitled to not only benefiting indefinitely from this man as her private slave, but she also feels entitled to (and is legally entitled to) ruining his life whenever she feels bored and wants him (but not his income) gone from her life.
The cost-benefit split in a slave-master relation is close to [infinity : zero] for the slave; and close to [zero : infinity] for the master.
This is the economic calculation of the typical non-Chad male in a typical betabuxx relationship.
For further enlightenment on the betabuxx dynamic: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1973951.The_Manipulated_Man
Last edited:
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
