Serious Can Science help us to know when it is really over?

[37YearOldVirgin]

I was reading Serg's post on blue/red/black pill, and also the study on looks/ height/ race/ wages and how they factor into attraction and mate selection, and I had an idea.. Has anyone considered making a scientifically backed self evaluation for inceldom? Like, a resource that we could use to figure out exactly how fucked we are.

We could break attractiveness into the various sub-categories (race, height, fitness, facial attractiveness, job, salary, social status etc), define the threshold for each where it's either over (blackpill) or possible to be ranked by fems (redpill), then assess their relative weighting in the aggregate 'total' score, and finally assign an individual score based on all of those factors. This would help us to objectively know whether or not black or red pill was in fact in effect for us, and also whether or not there were any areas that we could address that could possibly bump the aggregate score from blackpill territory (sub 4-5) to redpill territory (5-7).

I dunno, what do you guys think? Useful. Or a pointless waste of time/ energy?

 

[VisVoi]

Just create a tinder account, swipe 100 times (or whatever the maximum is), go outside and cold approach (or better yet, approach via a friend if you are lucky enough to have one). If you get ihome after a long day of approaching and have no tinder matched, it is over.

 

[acnescarcel]

i think its subjective, and one can argue its not totally over until you're dead.

 

[Evildoer]

There's no stable point, we only make predictions that are right for 99.9% of cases if one is 4/10 facially or below.

 

[backyardslayer]

i think its subjective, and one can argue its not totally over until you're dead.

Epic cope.

 

[narcissist]

Science can suck my dick