Chadsexual
Pollet & Nettle (2009)
Note that in both examples, the rich men didnt betabuxx, but actually make the foids cum.
Can money actually compensate looks to some extend for genuine attraction?
Chadsexual
Pollet & Nettle (2009)
Note that in both examples, the rich men didnt betabuxx, but actually make the foids cum.
Better looking people are usually richer, so its exepected for rich men give more orgasm to foids.
But it has nothing to do with income, just with looks again
But it has nothing to do with income, just with looks again
Elon Musk was just a baldcel that did hair grafts and fixed his inceldom he is no longer bad looking and he is 6'2
Money by itself no, but if you had money AND you were very smart, that could be a form of attraction. Not just smart and not just rich, both. Those still don't compete with physical attractiveness, but a very intelligent (I'm talking so intelligent that you ooze intelligence, 140+ IQ and not depressed or anxious so that intelligence actually gets to shine) and rich person can be attractive.
looks are the confounding variable?
high IQ, didnt think of that
Youre making a fundamental mistake here. Foids cant measure IQ. No foid ever asked for a guy's IQ to check if shes attracted to him. A foid's attraction is based on markers of intelligence, good genetics, etc.
If you're rich/successful, foids correlate that with intelligence. IQ and average yearly income are actually correlated quite strongly in the west atleast.
Money does matter to foids. A 5/10 guy with a lot of money have have the same SMV as a 7/10.
Well I don't mean women are attracted to IQ, I mean that a guy with a very high IQ (that means the general way of being intelligent and all that it entails) and that makes very good money will be somewhat attractive. Not nearly, not even close to how much looks mean, but it would increase SMV by 1 or 2 points compared to if he didn't have those things.
Theres no real way to measure IQ but its very easy to measure money.
Look, all I'm saying is that there's a very clear difference between some average schmuck and a really smart guy. Ordinarily, the fact that he's smart wouldn't be attractive to the ladies. But still, the qualitative difference between an average shmuck and a smart guy is very clear, night and day. Looks are paramount but let's not forget that human beings like to talk too, they like intelligence. Between an eggplant an Einstein, it's clear who a woman would rather be with.
That's not to say that intelligence is necessarily attractive. No, you could be the smartest man in your country and that wouldn't make you as attractive as a thug murderer with 50 IQ. BUT, a smart and rich, successful person would have a bit added to their SMV compared to the same guy if he didn't possess those qualities. Also, being smart doesn't mean you'll be successful so that's an important caveat, they need to have both for those traits to be worth shit, and even then it wouldn't be worth nearly as much as a Chad's looks.
A
Arthur Jones is a good example of a very intelligent, rich, but arguably not good looking man who fucked young women up until his last days.
But today this would probably not be possible anymore, at least not as a public person.
But today this would probably not be possible anymore, at least not as a public person.
D
Oh yeah just be 7th most richest man in the world, so easy bro! Money will make you slayer. Literally volcel if you don't money max to the point you are a multi bilionaire.
Similar threads
Ahylic
CocaColaCel
Users who are viewing this thread
