Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Can females be genetic invalids too?

M

MediumDiploma

Philosopher /Supervising Supervisor of Burger King
★★
Joined
Jul 23, 2022
Posts
1,679
Think of the ugliest possible women in your area. The one that looks like ogres, etc. Can they also be genetic invalids?
 
Yes, they can. There are many women who are legitimately retarded, have multiple heritable diseases, AND are extremely sickly. Having a baby would be dooming a human soul to the most brutal existence.

The sad thing is that there would be someone out there who would be willing to rawdog a woman like that and impregnate her.

Eugenics is the future of humanity. Literally.
 
burn victims, genetically disfigured, mental illness etc
 
No Way GIF
 
Yes, they can. There are many women who are legitimately retarded, have multiple heritable diseases, AND are extremely sickly. Having a baby would be dooming a human soul to the most brutal existence.

The sad thing is that there would be someone out there who would be willing to rawdog a woman like that and impregnate her.

Eugenics is the future of humanity. Literally.
Eugenics is a necessary evil.
 
how would you regulate sex?
You wouldn't. What you would regulate would be pregnancies and births. You would need breeding licenses to have a baby. Hospitals would not legally be allowed to birth children whose parents don't have a license. Children born without a license would have lesser rights. For example, they wouldn't be able to vote, and they would not qualify for other services. They would effectively be second class citizens. There could be an alternative option. The state would take in the children of unauthorized births, feed, clothe, and raise them, and then use them for service. Brave New World type shit.

I can already hear the human rights harpies REEEing, invoking arguments of genocide and ethnic cleansing by bureaucracy, and what have you. Breeding is not a human right. And, lest we forget, all rights are granted by an authority.

But this would best for humanity. We have the power to guide our own evolution, yet we're squandering it, like we're squandering so many other gifts over petty wars and greed. It's a sad state of affairs when being a selfish, maximally exploitive asshole is what's optimal in today's world for flourishing.

Those who are invalids would not have any of their rights revoked. They would simply live out their whole lives and their DNA would gracefully bow out of the competition.
 
Yes, and probably more often than men. There's so many fat disgusting female creatures out there. But, there's still men more than willing to fuck them and fund their lives.
 
Eugenics is a necessary evil.
Except it's not evil. At all. Completely and unabashedly.

You're literally preventing a majority of future human existential suffering by maximally increasing the probability of healthy, beautiful, and intelligent people to be born. Antinatalists should be very happy with eugenics as a philosophical and practical compromise.
 
Except it's not evil. At all. Completely and unabashedly.

You're literally preventing a majority of future human existential suffering by maximally increasing the probability of healthy, beautiful, and intelligent people to be born. Antinatalists should be very happy with eugenics as a philosophical and practical compromise.
 
In 2024? Probably not if I'm honest
 
You wouldn't. What you would regulate would be pregnancies and births. You would need breeding licenses to have a baby. Hospitals would not legally be allowed to birth children whose parents don't have a license. Children born without a license would have lesser rights. For example, they wouldn't be able to vote, and they would not qualify for other services. They would effectively be second class citizens. There could be an alternative option. The state would take in the children of unauthorized births, feed, clothe, and raise them, and then use them for service. Brave New World type shit.

I can already hear the human rights harpies REEEing, invoking arguments of genocide and ethnic cleansing by bureaucracy, and what have you. Breeding is not a human right. And, lest we forget, all rights are granted by an authority.

But this would best for humanity. We have the power to guide our own evolution, yet we're squandering it, like we're squandering so many other gifts over petty wars and greed. It's a sad state of affairs when being a selfish, maximally exploitive asshole is what's optimal in today's world for flourishing.

Those who are invalids would not have any of their rights revoked. They would simply live out their whole lives and their DNA would gracefully bow out of the competition.
Would there be any way for those unauthorized children to ascend? Like passing IQ tests or something?
 
Of course. But they can't be incel, that's the difference.
 
Rarely, downs syndrome foids have normie tier husbands, women with half their face gnawed off by a dog still have normie husbands, I used to have a portfolio of the stuff but eh the hate does not need more fuel.
 
Of course.. but unlike us, they’ll still find some desperate partner and have retarded kids with him… sad but true
 
Would there be any way for those unauthorized children to ascend? Like passing IQ tests or something?
They too would be screened for fitness. Genetic recombination is a thing, and they could luck out. Intelligence testing would be one component, yes.
 

Similar threads

tandoorichickencel
Replies
25
Views
433
Rabbi Schneerson
Rabbi Schneerson
TrueGlassesCel
Replies
6
Views
120
TrueGlassesCel
TrueGlassesCel
sexualeconomist
Replies
15
Views
311
Regressive
Regressive

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top