No and anyway even if I was this site is called incels.co not anticamgirl.co. Regardless if you are a simp, cuck, soy or even a gay incel, you are incel. Actually if anyone should be banned it is anyone who has ever visited an escort, they aren't technically incels.
1. Simps and cucks aren't allowed, never have been and never will be, it says alot about you that you think it should be allowed, you pretty much just outed yourself
2. What the fuck is a "gay incel", you might as well say femcel, its very easy to get laid as a gay man, there's no such thing as a gay incel, just Chad only gay guys
The sexual market value of gay men mirrors that of women, as men are horny all the time and have low standards
I've encountered ugly as sin gay guys at places I've worked that all had boyfriends, being a gay man is like being a woman, if you are saying gay incels exist then you are saying femcels exist
3. Your Logic:
>Paying women just to show you their bodies in scantily clothes or nudes (Acceptable behavior for an incel)
>Paying women to actually have sex with you to stop being
CELIBATE, as in
INVOLUNTARILY CELIBATE, as in
INCEL (You should be banned)
So you logic is, literally pursuing what an incel should pursue (escaping involuntary celibacy), means you should be banned, but paying women to just show you nudes (cucking yourself) is acceptable
4. JFL at all this mental gymnastics to justify you being a pathetic cuck, kill yourself
