Cuyen
Everything hurts and I'm dying
★★★★★
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2018
- Posts
- 38,132
Pedo is <12 i guessAm I a pedophile because I think jailbait girls are prime girls?
Her Name is Kerrie Torres, she works as the Assistant Superintendent of Educational Services for Brea Olinda USD and you can Email her here:
Brea Olinda Unified School District
The mission of the Brea Olinda Unified School District, in partnership with home and community, is to provide all students a quality education that prepares and inspires them to strive for high goals, become responsible, contributing citizens, and continue learning all their lives. To do this...www.bousd.us
Here's her Twitter:
Pictures:
View attachment 108777
View attachment 108778
And a video of her confession:
and a bio:
Educational Services – Educational Services – Brea Olinda Unified School District
The mission of the Brea Olinda Unified School District, in partnership with home and community, is to provide all students a quality education that prepares and inspires them to strive for high goals, become responsible, contributing citizens, and continue learning all their lives. To do this...www.bousd.us
Thanks man I will do something to her..
Not really, id say more under 8Pedo is <12 i guess
teen girls are hot, idgaf.But ephebophilia is bad
That and much more. Too bad WW3 will never happenWhat's next, zoophilia, necrophilia, guess?
I don't think It's a specific age.More like prepubescent in general.Pedo is <12 i guess
I predicted this months ago, that bestiality and pedophilia will be the next thing they begin to normalise. Seems that it is beginning to happen.
Well, at a time, per example in Spain, even a few years ago age of conscent was fixed at 13 years old, and before WWII, it was the case in many European countries.Most pedophiles aren't exclusive, but some are.
I guess it's just like gays, some people are irredeemably gay from birth, others are somewhere "in the middle" and influenced towards it.
In our current societies, on one hand you're harshly discouraged from pedophilia because of the laws galore against it and public reaction to it, but on the other, teen and adult girls are so shitty nowadays a lots of men who normally wouldn't be pedos (or at least not that much) must end up with a higher interest on it.
Not to mention how pedophilia is pretty much a normie-and-below man's only chance of ever touching a quality female nowadays.
All of that said, I'm not for sex with actual kids though.
I think non-violent, non-coercive sex with people past puberty isn't even worth discussing. It obviously should be allowed. They forbid it based on extrapolations of researches that show some correlation between violent sexual abuse at (usually young) childhood and trauma. How does the fact being violently raped at 5 yo for example correlates with trauma prove that having non-coercive, non-violent sex with a, for example, 14 yo girl will traumatize her?Well, at a time, per example in Spain, even a few years ago age of conscent was fixed at 13 years old, and before WWII, it was the case in many European countries.
The idea behind it is that if you can't drive a vehicle/vote/sign legally official documents, you can't have sex consent. Fair enough, we live much longer than 80 years ago, in general. Childhood and teenagerhood should be protected.
Now, with all the differences of aprehension, which depend on the country, it is difficult to say what should be the age of sexual conscent. At what age does a teenager have the right to decide what he wants to do with his sex life? IMO, it should be at least 16yo.
And in Europe to be called a pedophile and sentenced for years in prison, doesn't necessarily translate that in another you would be worried at all (see the map below).
View attachment 108822
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe
"Gore" pedophile movements emerged after WWII, and culminated during May 1968, and the 1970's, creating big scandals, even inside the Far-Left. Many supporters were writtesr/artists such as Henry de Montherlant or André Gide, or commie agitator Daniel Cohn-Bendit. It was never accepted in Europe, and always treated with total reject, disdain and disgust, yet even inside the most "progressive" movements. These "pedophile movements" were extremely minoritary, in addition.
Well, now we see it has been fully accepted and institutionalized in the US. What are they waiting for releasing the big pedophiles from prisons (since is now seen as "unjust")?
I don't think it's bullshit, and many girls "were" still kids at 15 yo (in their behavior, dressing, and face), at least when I was a teenager. Nowadays, we see kids as low as 10 yo dressing and acting like sluts. This should be forbidden to prevent degeneracy. The problem lies that marriage institution is totally neglected and discouraged, in many WE countries there is more divorce than marriage. Parental authority is also an important factor for the good developement of a society, and is as well totally neglected and discouraged, even making it a crime in some case.I think non-violent, non-coercive sex with people past puberty isn't even worth discussing. It obviously should be allowed. They forbid it based on extrapolations of researches that show some correlation between violent sexual abuse at (usually young) childhood and trauma. How does the fact being violently raped at 5 yo for example correlates with trauma prove that having non-coercive, non-violent sex with a, for example, 14 yo girl will traumatize her?
It's 100% bullshit.
What's really worth discussing is how we prevent degeneracy, single motherhood, STDs, feminism, inceldom, unsustainable birth rates and many other problems. And I tell you how: marry women as soon as possible after puberty to good men chosen by the girl's father, make adultery severely punishable and make divorce either impossible or only possible if something really fucked up happened.
About sex with kids, I don't think it traumatizes or hurts kids in all instances (in fact, there isn't a reason to think this is the case when even cherrypicked violent abuse, like aforementioned, generates correlations of about 40% with trauma in those researches), but I agree that it's better to protect ACTUAL KIDS (not post-pubescent people) from sex, especially with adults, since they're so fragile, both physically and mentally (especially physically in the case of rough penetration, something that will actually damage them in most cases).
Why waste some of the girl's prime years with celibacy? Girls are only really fertile between roughly 14 and 30, it's not advisable to impregnate them before or after that.I don't think it's bullshit, and many girls "were" still kids at 15 yo (in their behavior, dressing, and face), at least when I was a teenager. Nowadays, we see kids as low as 10 yo dressing and acting like sluts. This should be forbidden to prevent degeneracy. The problem lies that marriage institution is totally neglected and discouraged, in many WE countries there is more divorce than marriage. Parental authority is also an important factor for the good developement of a society, and is as well totally neglected and discouraged, even making it a crime in some case.
I don't consider that allowing a girl directly post-puberty to be allowed sex with an adult a good thing. She must mature a bit, to be married, as you propose. It is absolutely necessary to encourage celibacy and virginity, not to bring even more sex to younger age, in order to change things. Which, I consider the way things should be, reading you further, anyway.
In the conservative WE countries and Poland, a girl would usually be married between 18-20 yo, a generation ago (legal age of marriage is and used to be 18, and for a reason!). Arranged marriage is not an European tradition, but some parents would arrange a meeting with a potential husband, to help, as well as the Church.
Why waste some of the girl's prime years with celibacy? Girls are only really fertile between roughly 14 and 30, it's not advisable to impregnate them before or after that.
A girl's facial prime is a at 12-13. A girl's bodily prime is at 14-21. If you marry her only at 18, you already wasted a good 4-6 years of her prime. I don't see the point, really.
At 14 a girl is both sexually mature (or, at the very least, about to finish puberty; it's very rare to see some girl who still haven't finished it at that age nowadays) and already thinking about having sex. It's just a matter of channeling this in a positive way for both her, men, and society, through marriage with a stable guy. It mustn't be with a 40 yo dude, he can be 40, 30, 20, as long as he works and possesses the qualities for a stable, good husband. But a significant age difference is actually good in the long run. No man is satisfied with a 40 yo infertile, saggy woman when he's 40 as well, still horny as fuck as still fertile. It's better to have your wife be 20-25 while you're 40.
About the girl's mind, girls play with dolls since childhood, their sole purpose in this world is reproduction and raising small children, men mog them at fucking everything besides that. Anything else they can do is merely an optional bonus. It's not something extremely complicated, traumatizing and stressful either, it's easy and instinctive. Open your fucking legs to your husband, pleasure him sexually, eat healthily during pregnancy and then take care of your fucking baby, for God's sake. Can't you even do your fucking job, stupid woman?
No, it isn't a good step, do you know what pedophilia means? It's adult having sex with children, that's fucking disgusting.This isn't bad. It's actually a step in the right direction.
I'm not attracted to females who are underage, but individuals who are shouldn't be shamed for it. It's an attraction that can't be controlled, and should rather be focused on educating between what's right and wrong.
weedi live in cali i wish i was still in high school to verify this
They will accept it eventually too lifefuel for older senpaisBut ephebophilia is bad, teen girls just for teenie fuckboys
yes bro legal weedweed
i need it. this is against my human rightsyes bro legal weed
what the fuck is wrong with you?Not really, id say more under 8
the desire to kill in some people cannot be controlled. does that mean we shouldn't prevent it and should normalize it within society?This isn't bad. It's actually a step in the right direction.
I'm not attracted to females who are underage, but individuals who are shouldn't be shamed for it. It's an attraction that can't be controlled, and should rather be focused on educating between what's right and wrong.
none in your state? not even medical? getting a medical card is easy i got two before it became fully legal.i need it. this is against my human rights
Medical card in florida is expensive as fuck and the weed is expensive as fuck too $55 eighthsnone in your state? not even medical? getting a medical card is easy i got two before it became fully legal.
Not surprised tbh
No, if she's old enough to bleed...Am I a pedophile because I think jailbait girls are prime girls?
Hey buddy don't insult @Michael15651 again or you will regret it okwhat the fuck is wrong with you?
the desire to kill in some people cannot be controlled. does that mean we shouldn't prevent it and should normalize it within society?
fucking moron.
i apologizeHey buddy don't insult @Michael15651 again or you will regret it ok