Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Burgercels: If you were conscripted in a WW3 scenario, would you rather be sent to fight against the Russians or the Chinese?

title


  • Total voters
    9
Castaway

Castaway

Discord: astr44
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 23, 2024
Posts
3,951
It’s either grueling trench warfare in the fields and forests of Eastern Europe or high-intensity jungle warfare on the islands of the Pacific. Who would you rather face in battle? Russians or Chinks?
 
@DarkStar
@Horatio NiggER bird
 
I think I'd go with Russia tbh

I'd rather die in Europe than some random pacific island or the jungles of SEA; something about dying in the continent where my roots are seems a bit comforting.

Russians do have some pretty ferocious units, such as those Chechen soldiers they have. But in general I feel they are less competent than the Chinese.

However, they are White which means they would probably treat me better than the Chinese would I become a POW. Chinese also seem more likely to be cruel/violent.
 
Last edited:
russia because they are gynocentric cucks

i can guarantee for every dead russian soldier they have a photo of some foid who already forgot about them
 
What other countries could we include for another one of these? Maybe Iran?
 
Jfl China isn't a shining example for the patriarchy with its current birthrate
yeah its actually everywhere tbh
its just ive heard some cucked shit about russia especially
 
how about we just make ourselves ineligible for the draft and watch the party from home
 
yeah its actually everywhere tbh
its just ive heard some cucked shit about russia especially
Rices are more matriarchal than a lot think in the modern day and age.

On a but of a tangent, I don't get why some people on here like China so much. I mean sure, don't get me wrong it is always good to have some kind of "counterweight" so that we don't have one sole power dominating everything. I also think a lot of Boomers here overstate the threat it is . However, China is a totalitarian surveillance state which Klaus Schwab said he sees as a "model" for other countries.

So now imagine that, Chinese-tier monitoring and state-surveillance with Western gynocracy, LGBT, etc.
 
I would probably pick the chinese.

Although those darn zipperheads are crafty fuckers :feelstrash:

Would hate to die by falling into a spike pit or something like that.

1000004132
 
It’s either grueling trench warfare in the fields and forests of Eastern Europe or high-intensity jungle warfare on the islands of the Pacific. Who would you rather face in battle? Russians or Chinks?
The Russians since NATO troops in Europe will be better supplied relative to Russian troops in a hypothetical total war (even with Chinese intervention a la Korean War) due to the Western Democracies (excluding Japan and South Korea due to virtually guaranteed buck passing) possessing greater latent power by virtue of their extensive industrial infrastructure (although somewhat weakened with the advent of deindustrialization) and more developed administrative apparatus (again, relative to Russia). A WW3 scenario would almost certainly be a total war where the the Great Powers would mobilize their entire economy for war, which would put Russia at a severe disadvantage logistically, thus their conscripts will suffer higher casualty rates relative to US conscripts.

China, on the other hand, possess a rapidly modernizing army and soon to be blue water Navy in spite of the political purges of military personnel carried out by Xi Jinping due to allegations of corruption. Despite suffering from some economic headwinds, their economy still grows at almost double the rate of the US GDP in terms of PPP (5%> and 2.5% respectively) and, in my personal opinion, China's economic headwinds (real estate troubles, persistent deflation, demographic slowdown, spiralling local government debt, high youth unemployment, and low consumption) are not as serious or insurmountable as most Western analysts think, and are transient troubles that are part of China's growing troubles as they shift to another growth model. Due to possessing a dynamic, fast growing economy (superior industrial capacity due to hollowing out of American manufacturing); a rapidly modernizing military that will soon reach parity with the US; and a potential war being located right in China's backyard (despite possessing military bases in East Asia, the US is thousands of miles away and separated by the world's largest ocean), US conscripts will suffer disportionate casualties relative to Chinese conscripts in a hypothetical total war

Thus, I would prefer fighting the Russians assuming that both scenarios are a total war and I am an ordinary grunt soldier (however, the brilliant Professor Mearsheimer has given a highly convincing counterargument that any future potential war against China will be a limited engagement relative to the pior World Wars which I will not expand on here due to laziness)

P.S. I apologize for any grammar errors since I texted this all on my phone with no proofreading
 
The Russians since NATO troops in Europe will be better supplied relative to Russian troops in a hypothetical total war (even with Chinese intervention a la Korean War) due to the Western Democracies (excluding Japan and South Korea due to virtually guaranteed buck passing) possessing greater latent power by virtue of their extensive industrial infrastructure (although somewhat weakened with the advent of deindustrialization) and more developed administrative apparatus (again, relative to Russia). A WW3 scenario would almost certainly be a total war where the the Great Powers would mobilize their entire economy for war, which would put Russia at a severe disadvantage logistically, thus their conscripts will suffer higher casualty rates relative to US conscripts.

China, on the other hand, possess a rapidly modernizing army and soon to be blue water Navy in spite of the political purges of military personnel carried out by Xi Jinping due to allegations of corruption. Despite suffering from some economic headwinds, their economy still grows at almost double the rate of the US GDP in terms of PPP (5%> and 2.5% respectively) and, in my personal opinion, China's economic headwinds (real estate troubles, persistent deflation, demographic slowdown, spiralling local government debt, high youth unemployment, and low consumption) are not as serious or insurmountable as most Western analysts think, and are transient troubles that are part of China's growing troubles as they shift to another growth model. Due to possessing a dynamic, fast growing economy (superior industrial capacity due to hollowing out of American manufacturing); a rapidly modernizing military that will soon reach parity with the US; and a potential war being located right in China's backyard (despite possessing military bases in East Asia, the US is thousands of miles away and separated by the world's largest ocean), US conscripts will suffer disportionate casualties relative to Chinese conscripts in a hypothetical total war

Thus, I would prefer fighting the Russians assuming that both scenarios are a total war and I am an ordinary grunt soldier (however, the brilliant Professor Mearsheimer has given a highly convincing counterargument that any future potential war against China will be a limited engagement relative to the pior World Wars which I will not expand on here due to laziness)

P.S. I apologize for any grammar errors since I texted this all on my phone with no proofreading
I'm not an expert on military matters so I could be wrong
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top