SuicideFuel BRUTAL Heightpill: How a Dynasty was defeated by 1 Heightmog

[LesscoBlob]

I present 183cm tall General Douglas MacArthur brutally gigamogging 165cm tall Emperor Hirohito.

Look at how he humiliatingly stands up straight while MacArthur is perfectly relaxed and fully aware of his American superiority. Only in light of this horrific mog did Japan finally unconditionally surrender to the Allies, ending a conflict 4 years old and sparing thousands of lives. Hirohito was never able to cope after this mogging event, broadcasting his shame to the Japanese people in 1946 by admiting he was a manlet and that his people were not that better than him. The Allies felt pity for the poor man and let him keep his position, but only after stripping him of all political power and influence.

It never began for ricecel manlets. @Lv99_BixNood

 

[LesscoBlob]

Bump

 

[wereq]

Need robust nordic amazon stacy to uplift and save my manlet bloodline.

 

[BataviaCel]

 

[Puppeter]

Height is life

 

[Moroccancel]

No height for your Vietnam campaign.

 

[LesscoBlob]

No height for your Vietnam campaign.

The US won in Vietnam lmao. They just decided to stop sending troops.

 

[LesscoBlob]

Still managed to create a good country after being destroyed in WW2, same goes for China

I have to say, it's impressive how they still managed to do it. I believe the reason behind this was the cope that they may technologically advance so much that they'll be able to modify their height and drop manletism for good.

 

[NorthernWind]

The US won in Vietnam lmao. They just decided to stop sending troops.

They didn't won in Korea, although.

 

[Newton the 2nd]

Notorious height mogging

 

[Moroccancel]

The US won in Vietnam lmao. They just decided to stop sending troops.

Cope.

 

[IncelCream]

Now Asian women worship whitu godu

 

[Moroccancel]

Now Asian women worship whitu godu

The white man should be smart and not mix with noodleswhores. Their recessive genes are parasitic.

 

[LesscoBlob]

Cope.

Facts don't care about your feelings.

 

[LesscoBlob]

They didn't won in Korea, although.

Yes they did. They defended South Korea from the Communist shithole up north. They could have won if they just nuked China.

 

[Moroccancel]

Facts don't care about your feelings.

Withdrawing from a lost war. Typical american mental gymnastic not to recognize the obvious: a lost war.

 

[Moroccancel]

Yes they did. They defended South Korea from the Communist shithole up north. They could have won if they just nuked China.

Without the intervention of the usual ones, they would have fallen in a matter of months. Weak South shithole.

 

[LesscoBlob]

Withdrawing from a lost war. Typical american mental gymnastic not to recognize the obvious: a lost war.

Most of Vietnam's major battles were American victories. Plus the Viet Cong had several times more casualties than the Americans. Vietnam got its ass kicked lol.

 

[LesscoBlob]

Without the intervention of the usual ones, they would have fallen in a matter of months. Weak South shithole.

Sucks to not have allies lmao.

 

[Moroccancel]

Sucks to not have allies lmao.

They did. China and the Soviet Union. South Korea only held out for an international coalition, while the North Korean Red Army subdued weak K-popmaxxers from the south.

 

[LesscoBlob]

They did. China and the Soviet Union. South Korea only held out for an international coalition, while the North Korean Red Army subdued weak K-popmaxxers from the south.

Both of these allies are weak and they were divided by the 70s

 

[Moroccancel]

Most of Vietnam's major battles were American victories. Plus the Viet Cong had several times more casualties than the Americans. Vietnam got its ass kicked lol.

The satellite state of South Vietnam was annihilated, communism won materially in Indochina, the Americans lost an enormous amount of human and material resources. And you call him "no, they didn't lose, they just quit." This is just a bunch of idealistic patriots and tradcucks of the United States.

The Americans did not achieve their goals and Vietnam was unified into a communist dictatorship. This was clearly a defeat.

 

[Moroccancel]

Both of these allies are weak and they were divided by the 70s

You can't talk about history in speculative hindsight. The Korean War is one thing, the Vietnam War another, and the Sino-Soviet split was something else entirely.

 

[LesscoBlob]

the Americans lost an enormous amount of human and material resources.

58000 isn't a lot of resources

And you call him "no, they didn't lose, they just quit." This is just a bunch of idealistic patriots and tradcucks of the United States.

It's called being right.

The Americans did not achieve their goals and Vietnam was unified into a communist dictatorship. This was clearly a defeat.

Vietnam is capitalist, same with China lol. America will never lose.

 

[LesscoBlob]

You can't talk about history in speculative hindsight. The Korean War is one thing, the Vietnam War another, and the Sino-Soviet split was something else entirely.

Which proves that North Korea never had any allies.

 

[Moroccancel]

Which proves that North Korea never had any allies.

Yes they did. By the 70s with the Sino-Soviet division, it made the Juche ideology bet more on autarky to get away from the ideological sectarian conflicts between the Marxist-Leninist lines. However, trade and military and technological aid continued to be present, as, for example, in the development of nuclear power plants and nuclear technology.

 

[Moroccancel]

58000 isn't a lot of resources

It's called being right.

Vietnam is capitalist, same with China lol. America will never lose.

If you say so.

Mental gymnastic.

Every country was capitalist, including the Soviet Union. Not even socialists. Since for practical purposes they acted as state capitalism.

 

[LesscoBlob]

Yes they did. By the 70s with the Sino-Soviet division, it made the Juche ideology bet more on autarky to get away from the ideological sectarian conflicts between the Marxist-Leninist lines. However, trade and military and technological aid continued to be present, as, for example, in the development of nuclear power plants and nuclear technology.

Interesting how none of this aid made North Korea any more relevant.

 

[LesscoBlob]

If you say so.

Mental gymnastic.

North Vietnam had several times more casualties than the US with a much smaller population. If you consider tha American casualties high, the North Vietnam got its ass kicked by America, so it was defeated.

 

[Chudpreet]

fully aware of his American superiority

Anglo superiority*

American nationality makes no one superior, in fact it’s the opposite

 

[Chudpreet]

Need robust nordic amazon stacy to uplift and save my manlet bloodline.

What happened to curry genocide and no race-mixing?

 

[Moroccancel]

Interesting how none of this aid made North Korea any more relevant.

South Korea was only able to overtake North Korea through five-year plans in the 1970s. With the fall of the USSR, trade between socialist countries fell and North Korea entered a more extreme autarky. Moreover, only through the dictatorship and state planning can we explain the South Korean evolution in the second half of the 20th century.

Aid in nuclear research and technology has allowed them not to become an Afghanistan or a Libya.

 

[LesscoBlob]

South Korea was only able to overtake North Korea through five-year plans in the 1970s. With the fall of the USSR, trade between socialist countries fell and North Korea entered a more extreme autarky. Moreover, only through the dictatorship and state planning can we explain the South Korean evolution in the second half of the 20th century.

Aid in nuclear research and technology has allowed them not to become an Afghanistan or a Libya.

South Korea managed to advance more than North Korea, because South Korea is a capitalist state.

 

[Moroccancel]

North Vietnam had several times more casualties than the US with a much smaller population. If you consider tha American casualties high, the North Vietnam got its ass kicked by America, so it was defeated.

The fact that you take casualties as a way of analyzing victory or defeat is militarily absurd and historically fallacious. The Soviet Union bore 70% of the burden in the Continental War and it is they who objectively defeated Nazism. They won the war and lost far more human and material resources than everyone else.

American interests in Vietnam were not fulfilled and the only thing they came away with was human and material losses. Technically it is a defeat, in the same way that the Soviets lost in Afghanistan.

No need to keep twisting the twist again and again in mental gymnastics to continue going against the naturalness of wars: some are won, others are lost.

 

[LesscoBlob]

The fact that you take casualties as a way of analyzing victory or defeat is militarily absurd and historically fallacious. The Soviet Union bore 70% of the burden in the Continental War and it is they who objectively defeated Nazism. They won the war and lost far more human and material resources than everyone else.

American interests in Vietnam were not fulfilled and the only thing they came away with was human and material losses. Technically it is a defeat, in the same way that the Soviets lost in Afghanistan.

No need to keep twisting the twist again and again in mental gymnastics to continue going against the naturalness of wars: some are won, others are lost.

1: The Soviet Union did win against Germany, because it also had help from the Allies + The amount of men lost cost the USSR a lost generation that contributed to Russia's demographic problem.

2: The Soviets only "lost" in Afghanistan, because they decided they didn't want to continue the war effort. This has been the case with all other major powers trying to take over Afghanistan. They give up mainly because it's not valuable land.

 

[Moroccancel]

South Korea managed to advance more than North Korea, because South Korea is a capitalist state.

You are confused and you do not know the factor of the evolution of the economies of the two countries. By the 1970s, under the same conditions of destruction and reconstruction in both countries, the North Korean economy was superior to the South Korean economy. This is a fact. For the following years, and thanks to the dictatorship of Sygman Ree, The South Korean economy began to catch up with the North Korean economy thanks to five-year plans and a fairly strong commitment to the industrialization of the country. Starting in the 90s, the South Korean economy increasingly outperformed the North Korean economy due to factors such as the destruction of the socialist bloc, the brutal decline of the North Korean economy, and increasing autarky implanted by the Juche regime.

A case similar to shock therapy occurred in Chile, where powerful state intervention was required to carry out powerful industrialization.

 

[wereq]

What happened to curry genocide and no race-mixing?

Everything is wishful thinking. We will have nothing.

 

[osman27]

Need robust nordic amazon stacy to uplift and save my manlet bloodline.

hmmmmm

 

[NorthernWind]

Yes they did. They defended South Korea from the Communist shithole up north. They could have won if they just nuked China.

Situation in Korea was a stalemate. Don't you forget that US and their allies captured almost all territory of North Korea? So losing it could hardly be described as winning.

 

[LesscoBlob]

Situation in Korea was a stalemate. Don't you forget that US and their allies captured almost all territory of North Korea? So losing it could hardly be described as winning.

The objective was never to take over North Korea, it was to protect South Korea, which was 100% successful.

 

[depressedblackcel]

hmmmmm
View attachment 761694

right is more attractive imo, left Is attractive too but right for me is just better