Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Boomers and gen X

Czes

Czes

Greycel
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Posts
79
Boomers and gen X live big, know nothing about hard work, but still talk high and mighty.

Their "achievements" are based on nothing. They don't deserve respect.

The same tutorial mode women live in, is the one boomers and gen X lived all their youth in.
And these ignorant dismissive assholes think WE have the same.

Gen X and younger boomers are literally as addicted to smartphones and social media as zoomers are btw.

Interactions with them go like this for me:
  1. They tell me they worked and studied harder than me.
  2. I tell them the economy has changed drastically.
  3. They say nothing.
How the fuck do they get away with it?
 
Higher iq version of my post:
They had it so easy. Relationships, jobs, school, housing market you name it it was 100x easier back then
Because they lived in the best era ever, where getting laid was easy. And where guys weren't competing with the whole town but just the people around them. Women didn't have a choice or access to every chad in town either.
They didn't have internet or porn in free access, so they had no choice but to get out and be with their friends.

So they live in a parallel dimension, they don't know anything of our hypersexualized society, and unironically think all you have to do is to talk to women to get laid.

And the worst thing is that THEY made this future for us, they thought it was nice to unleash the sexual power of women.
+

In our societies, sex does represent the second system of differentiation, completely independent of money; and it behaves as a system of differentiation that is at least as ruthless. The effects of these two systems are strictly equivalent.

Like economic liberalism without restraint, and for similar reasons, sexual liberalism produces phenomena of absolute impoverishment. Some people make love every day; others make love five or six times in their lives, or never. Some make love with dozens of women; others with none.

This is called the "law of the market". In an economic system where firing is prohibited, everyone more or less manages to find his or her place. In a sexual system where adultery is prohibited, everyone more or less manages to find a bedfellow. In a perfectly liberal economic system, some accumulate considerable fortunes; others languish in unemployment and misery.

In a perfectly liberal sexual system, some have a varied and exciting erotic life; others are reduced to masturbation and loneliness. Sexual liberalism is the extension of economic liberalism and the ones who were adults in the 1970s wanted it.
 
Their parents gave them a Country in which they can easily prosper. They gave you a shithole.
 
uhhhh i only made $5 an hour at ur age:feelstastyman:
 
Male sexlessness rising, record breaking loneliness and isolation, highest rates of hypergamy, corona chan fucking everything up, forced vaccines, onlyfans turning into the norm for foids, etc.

Zoomers are fucked.
 
They will never admit that wages have stagnated while cost of living has increased drastically. I know millennial engineers who make less than their parents used to make when working low tier jobs like cashier/clerk

Winners in a rigged game will consider the game fair as long as they keep winning

Many people are prone to believing in the just-world fallacy—the notion that our victories and failures are just and the appropriate reward or punishment to our actions. People like to continue believing the world is fair even when they intellectually know that it is not.

Researchers tested people's predispositions to the just-world fallacy by having them engage in a rigged card game. The game was designed so that one player would have a clear advantage throughout the game that would essentially guarantee their victory. They found that although both players could recognize the game was imbalanced, the winner was consistently more likely to still believe the game was "fair" and that their victory was the result of their skill and merit.

They suggest this can help understand how people react to inequalities in life. Generally, in a rigged game, their findings show that those who "win" will have a greater tendency to ignore the legitimate complaints of those who lose.

Quotes:


  • Winners were generally more likely to believe that the game was fair, even when the playing field was most heavily tilted in their favor.
  • In short, it’s not just how the game is played, it’s also whether you win or lose.

References:


  • Molina M, Bucca M, Macy MW. 2019. It’s not just how the game is played, it’s whether you win or lose. Science Advances. 5(7): eaau1156. [FullText]
 
I’m a zoomer
 

Similar threads

WRATH OF HONKLER
Replies
7
Views
158
Pancakecel
Pancakecel
TheJester
Replies
3
Views
394
WizardofSoda
W
FuckTheFBI
Replies
44
Views
1K
Ryne gosling
Ryne gosling

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top