Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Bohmian mechanics kinds of debunks some aspects of quantum mechanics if the model is true

R

ryhan

Julias dracul romanov the 2 eyed abyss
★★★★★
Joined
May 20, 2019
Posts
4,460
Wave particle duality kind of goes out the window reality if this view is correct when electrons in space time (3rd/4th dimension as you cannot have space without time or time without space and time is a dimension onto itsownself) but anyways particles in space time would no longer be in states of superposition rather things would be in 1 state so things would not be in 2 places at once.

Next point of this argument or where this leads to i am aware you all know the basics behind the arguments for the double slit experiment but to briefly go over this if you have a double slit and you fire a electron through it it acts as a wave when we have a measuring apparatus and we fire electron through it acts as a particle.

QM says it is observation or other interpretations are the cause of if.

Here is the other view bohemian mechanics the main idea is say the reason the particles act differently when we have a measuring apparatus the idea is that it affects the results cause their are other effects added onto it other forces.

What this would mean if rather than things being undetermined they are determined by prior things and other physical items since they are also made up of quantum bits Ergo electrons they affects the electron to create a particle.

Where does this all lead to well if it's true wave particle dualism would turn out to be false if this model is true.


We don't know yet but it's a coin toss if QM theory is true it leads to idealism if bohemian mechanics is true it leads to materialism or realism.

Depending on which it would appear physical reality is either materialistic or monastic (constructed by the mind)
 
There's a lot of interpretations on QM, nobody is totally certain which is true because it's impossible to measure. Although the wave particle duality has been proven through double slit experiments that show that electrons have wave like interference.


1st point your right we can't measure but that's cause mainly our eyes are not well adapted enough to follow just how quick an electron is.

As for the 2nd point if and this is just assuming for a sec if the 2nd interpretation bohemian mechanics is true wave particle duality goes out the window mainly cause for something like a wave or a particle to exist like what your claiming it would have to be in quantum superposition both here and their if the 2nd is true the particles would just be onto their own selfs rather than a wave particle duality assuming for a minute the 2nd interpretation is true i'm not saying it is but it's worthy of consideration
 
Which is why the Copenhagen interpretation is the more accepted one, because duality has been proven.



That might be wrong is what i am saying
 
Too low iq for this didn't read
 

Similar threads

SuperKanga.Belgrade
Replies
34
Views
332
SuperKanga.Belgrade
SuperKanga.Belgrade
AsiaCel
Replies
13
Views
409
Sonicfancel
Sonicfancel
KingOfInceldia
Replies
0
Views
99
KingOfInceldia
KingOfInceldia
KingOfInceldia
Replies
0
Views
74
KingOfInceldia
KingOfInceldia

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top