One of the most common ways I've seen real-life friends and family defend women was saying that their behavior is a result of evolutionary incentives and we "have to accept it" or "can't hate them for it." This is what I call biological reductionism.
An outdated model of the brain categorizes it into three parts: the 'reptilian brain,' the limbic system, and the neocortex. While this triune model has been rightly criticized from a neurological standpoint, it still offers valuable insights for understanding individual and societal behaviors. Essentially, with biological reductionism, we are excusing women for not utilizing their secondary and trinary brain complexes and making their choices entirely on what their reptilian brains want. This is an unjust hypocrisy. Men are not granted the same courtesy by society. Our reptilian brains tell us to fuck every woman we see, sometimes even forcefully, yet we're able to utilize our neocortex to not do that. We might feel lust for many women, but most men feel love for only one woman at a time. Doing otherwise is not excusable, from both a societal and moral standpoint.
Unfortunately, feminist indoctrination, specifically the view that misogyny, even when justified with a great grievance, is a great impermissible evil, has made the female equivalent of male reptilian brain behavior perfectly acceptable. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy that lets women get away with being actual baboons. As feminism advances, things will get even worse as most remotely desirable women will be a part of Chad's revolving harem (most women would rather be Chad's side-chick rather than the sole partner of their looksmatch) and their defenders will keep utilizing this very argument to let them keep getting away with this.
Things are very bleak, gentlemen.
An outdated model of the brain categorizes it into three parts: the 'reptilian brain,' the limbic system, and the neocortex. While this triune model has been rightly criticized from a neurological standpoint, it still offers valuable insights for understanding individual and societal behaviors. Essentially, with biological reductionism, we are excusing women for not utilizing their secondary and trinary brain complexes and making their choices entirely on what their reptilian brains want. This is an unjust hypocrisy. Men are not granted the same courtesy by society. Our reptilian brains tell us to fuck every woman we see, sometimes even forcefully, yet we're able to utilize our neocortex to not do that. We might feel lust for many women, but most men feel love for only one woman at a time. Doing otherwise is not excusable, from both a societal and moral standpoint.
Unfortunately, feminist indoctrination, specifically the view that misogyny, even when justified with a great grievance, is a great impermissible evil, has made the female equivalent of male reptilian brain behavior perfectly acceptable. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy that lets women get away with being actual baboons. As feminism advances, things will get even worse as most remotely desirable women will be a part of Chad's revolving harem (most women would rather be Chad's side-chick rather than the sole partner of their looksmatch) and their defenders will keep utilizing this very argument to let them keep getting away with this.
Things are very bleak, gentlemen.
