Being ugly is wrong, it is a mistake of nature and humanity, ugly people will be excluded because they are a bad product.
They are despicable and disgusting
They are despicable and disgusting
The way this is worded makes it sound like you're not including yourself in the ugly
Being ugly isn’t wrong.
Society and human thinking is.
Let the weird inceldians live on and spite normarley
AgreThe way this is worded makes it sound like you're not including yourself in the ugly
The way this is worded makes it sound like you're not including yourself in the ugly
The way this is worded makes it sound like you're not including yourself in the ugly
Mods he's being incelphobic
Kill him in Minecraft
Kill him in Minecraft
Last edited:
Writing style, referring in the third person, there are some passages in the Bible like thisThe way this is worded makes it sound like you're not including yourself in the ugly
There's no reason to rationalize so much, it's wrong, being ugly is wrong, the world is simple, it is what it is and that's it.
M
I disgust people with my face, and I was also given short height and autism. If I had a past life, I must have been the most cruel human to ever exist.
Being ugly isn’t wrong you organic fucktwat.
I’ll slap Mother Nature out of you and beat both of you to shit.
We inceldians will beat you normarleyans
It’s not it, it’s what it should be. And it’s being able to be born without persecution. You organic nigger. @Stupid Clown get this bitch
Ideally , being ugly shouldn’t be considered wrong, but because of sexual selection and evolution being ugly is considered wrong.
Key findings from the study suggest that both perceived attractiveness and dominance were linked to higher self-reported university social status for both males and females. However, for males only, these factors were also associated with higher self-reported society social status. Gender differences emerged, with the impact of attractiveness and dominance on society social status being more pronounced for males than females. This aligns with previous research indicating that attractiveness is more strongly connected to social status in male-dominated contexts, such as fraternities. The theoretical explanations for these findings point to evolutionary roots, where stronger, more dominant males in ancestral societies likely provided better protection and resources for their mates, leading to a strong association between these traits and social status in males. Additionally, the passage notes gender-specific competition, where males engage in more direct, face-to-face competition, while females tend to compete more indirectly, contributing to the stronger link between attractiveness, dominance, and social status in males.
Cues of Social Status: Associations Between Attractiveness, Dominance, and Status - PMC
Hierarchies naturally emerge in social species, and judgments of status in these hierarchies have consequences for social relationships and health. Although judgments of social status are shaped by appearance, the physical cues that inform judgments ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The study titled "Cues of Social Status: Associations Between Attractiveness, Dominance, and Status" investigates how physical traits like attractiveness and dominance influence perceptions of an individual's social status. The researchers hypothesized that individuals perceived as more attractive and dominant would also be judged as having higher status. Their findings supported this hypothesis, showing that participants rated individuals who were judged as more attractive and dominant as possessing higher social status. These associations were consistent across different samples of raters who evaluated photographs with varying expressions, such as smiling and neutral faces.
This research contributes to our understanding of how physical cues can inform judgments of social status, highlighting the role of attractiveness and dominance in these perceptions.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
