Being religious and being blackpilled are mutually exclusive

[Deleted member 10531]

The very root of the blackpill knowledge is in evolutionary psychology, if you reject evolution, you can not logically explain why the blackpill would be true, you can cope with "spiritualism" all day long, but you can not have religions which have a creation story (christianity, islam, judaism, hinduism, etc etc), as those are fundementally incompatible with the blackpill.

 

[vic624]

High IQ. I can tell you also that religion doesn't "override" anyone's behavior unless there's a threat of force like in Sharia. Otherwise, foids will just see Chad as "closer to god" but it's all the same old lookism.

 

[Vermilioncore]

You don't have to believe in evolution or be an atheist to know that looks = everything though

 

[NeetSupremacist]

cope

Believing in evolution does not negate believing in God.

 

[Deleted member 16455]

I 100% agree with this. Creationism contradicts the blackpill because it suggests that there is an entity that molded things into the way they are rather than nature taking its course inevitably leading to disaster

 

[IamJacksBrokenHeart]

Religion is one of the best copes availlable on this planet .

Believing in evolution does not negate believing in God.

Religion is nothing more than a controlled mental illness ,
which can prove to be quite beneficial .
This random ethnic called Jesus told himself that hes the Son of God
til he believed it and this gave him the Determination to achieve his goals .

 

[vic624]

I 100% agree with this. Creationism contradicts the blackpill because it suggests that there is an entity that molded things into the way they are rather than nature taking its course inevitably leading to disaster

The blackpill is pure science. The problem with bluepillers and religion is that they, unlike science, start from preconceived ideas and then select what they want to see that supports that preconceived idea. That's why bluepillers think one outlier ascended incel is a refutation of the whole blackpill, because they don't understand the scientific principle of predictable repeatable results.

 

[Glokta]

Religion without having a community is pretty much useless. Your coreligionists should help you and you should help them when needed. Without it, you're just larping for social brownie points or you have a legit schizophrenia.

All churches I went to in my corner of Eastern Europe are dying out. Church attendance is shrinking fast. The only people who regularly attend mass are older foids (50 year old and up).

 

[Deleted member 15737]

How does the blackpill contradict religion in anyway? The Bible is probably the oldest blackpilled book in existence. It basically says we are cursed to be shitty fucking creatures.

 

[Deleted member 16455]

The blackpill is pure science. The problem with bluepillers and religion is that they, unlike science, start from preconceived ideas and then select what they want to see that supports that preconceived idea. That's why bluepillers think one outlier ascended incel is a refutation of the whole blackpill, because they don't understand the scientific principle of predictable repeatable results.

The blackpill is also talking about the uncomfortable truths of human nature which religion bypasses

 

[Deleted member 4159]

We need a patriarchy without religion.

 

[Deleted member 6657]

Who needs logic, who needs science?

Women hold satan as their father. Satan is her daddy.

 

[Mad Baron]

It depends on your view of God. Religious incels might believe that God is testing them in this life with extreme loneniess while testing Chad with unlimited access of women. Although a good cope, this idea is flawed because Chad can just repent at the last days of his life while an incel monk can go to hell for doubting the existence of god in his last days.

 

[FinnCel]

I don't know man
In Christianity, the world is shit and that's why we need a saviour

 

[ionlycopenow]

Religion is a philosophical cope. Because being blackpilled and not roping is not only cucked but low iq. Many philosophers believed in the idea of a god rather than in a god himself. It's also good for keeping shit from getting completely fucked. Dostoyevsky speaks of this in his books

 

[Deleted member 17606]

Cope or not have you ever read the bible? It explains human and foids nature. Full of blackpills. And it lays the guidelines for a society and for an individual to not be degenerate.

 

[Sparrow's Song]

You can reject creationism and still acknowledge The Monad. Chaos is the universe and order only exists in one's will.

 

[Over4Mexicels]

Religion without having a community is pretty much useless.

This basically.

Religion is not about believing in a jew-on a stick and his miracles nor about a camel rider sandnigger who conquered Arabian Peninsula.

It's about organization.

Majority of Jews are not religious yet they promote their interests by forming an organization with religion as the ideological glue.

 

[Ellsworth]

This thread title made me think of YouTubed Sunrise Hoodie. He’s a mgtow, so not exactly black pill, but he’s Christian. It’s been months since I watched one of his videos tho.

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

The very root of the blackpill knowledge is in evolutionary psychology, if you reject evolution, you can not logically explain why the blackpill would be true, you can cope with "spiritualism" all day long, but you can not have religions which have a creation story (christianity, islam, judaism, hinduism, etc etc), as those are fundementally incompatible with the blackpill.

Well to be fair Piattelli Palmarini is a non religious who is highly critical about Darwinism. He says micro evolution is observable while macro evolution is not (trans species evolution). You can still believe in natural adaptation and not be a Darwinist

 

[Deleted member 10531]

Well to be fair Piattelli Palmarini is a non religious who is highly critical about Darwinism. He says micro evolution is observable while macro evolution is not (trans species evolution). You can still believe in natural adaptation and not be a Darwinist

Yeah, like the "micro evolution", would not ultimately lead to a vast change of macroevolution

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

Yeah, like the "micro evolution", would not ultimately lead to a vast change of macroevolution

What do you mean? He was arguing that macro evolution isn't observable since it involves adding genome and what we can observe is just the deterioration or mutation of genome so you have to same species just adapting to the new environment but not creating anther species

 

[Deleted member 10531]

What do you mean? He was arguing that macro evolution isn't observable since it involves adding genome and what we can observe is just the deterioration or mutation of genome so you have to same species just adapting to the new environment but not creating anther species

No it doesn't, macro evolution is when one population species becomes another, (that is, when they can not produce fertile offspring), and once a population transforms enough, it is no longer able to successfully reproduce with that original population group, it is thus a different species.

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

No it doesn't, macro evolution is when one population species becomes another, (that is, when they can not produce fertile offspring), and once a population transforms enough, it is no longer able to successfully reproduce with that original population group, it is thus a different species.

I understood that but what they say (with like 0 people counterargumenting in a convincing way) is that while we see everyday degradation or mutation of genome, the augmentation of the genome through new informations has never been proved nor witnessed.
Check out Palmarini when you have some time. Very interesting arguments and he is not even religious

 

[tanfeo]

Yeah I have been struggling with that lately.
A few years ago I converted to Islam, convinced it was a better system for society and so I took the spiritual part with it.
Somehow it made me a better person (no smoking, alcohol, swine etc.) but last week a guy I know came by and told me:

"So you went religious. And you still didn't get a GF and didn't get laid. What did it ever bring you, instead of making you more socially isolated?"

He's actually right.
If I didn't get a GF before, I sure won't get one now.
So if I somehow want to break this isolation, should I just throw overboard religion and values and start visiting bars, dancings and whorehouses again?
I feel there is just no escape from this shit and being religious makes it even more difficult.

 

[Deleted member 10531]

I understood that but what they say (with like 0 people counterargumenting in a convincing way) is that while we see everyday degradation or mutation of genome, the augmentation of the genome through new informations has never been proved nor witnessed.
Check out Palmarini when you have some time. Very interesting arguments and he is not even religious

The mutation of the genome through generations are what cause macroevolution

 

[needsolution]

religion is just jewish cope, i quit that shit long time ago

 

[Cybersex is our hope]

The mutation of the genome through generations are what cause macroevolution

No. This only cause adaptation but not a new species

 

[Neggr]

religion is cope lol