Seeing that normies have lately been openly admitting to supporting bullying and bullies
:
View: https://x.com/SimpNeelix/status/1849539119216755094
incels.is
With the implicit justification that the bullied children are the real monsters who need to be beaten up and kept under control because they might turn out to be le evil inkwells who will abuse women.
incels.is
I've decided to see how true those beliefs are, especially when it comes to dating/domestic violence and abuse, which is one of the topics that really riles up normies. So, how do those claims of heroic bullies keeping society going and evil bullied kids wishing to destroy it and harm people hold up to reality? Not at all, it turns out.
School Bullying Perpetration and Other Childhood Risk Factors as Predictors of Adult Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration
An older but golden study showing that frequently bullying your peers as a child is by far the greatest predictor of being a domestic abuser as an adult, completely shaming all the other usual explanations such as being physically or sexually abused as a child, or witnessing domestic abuse in your own household as a child. Sure, those "abused becomes abuser", "cycle of violence" factors do matter, but being a bully is several times more important in this.
Speaking of that, just why are normies so obsessed with the idea that all violence, abuse and so on can be explained as a cycle? That everyone who is aggressive or violent is that way because someone else had harmed them before? That the actual bad thing about abuse is not the immediate harm, but that the abused child will inevitably go on to abuse someone else?
Are they just so terrified by the thought of the world not being just? By the idea that some people are nasty for no reason and dish out much more abuse than they take their entire lives, while some people are just lifelong victims through no fault of their own?
Anyway, let's look at something newer.
Longitudinal Associations Between Bullying and Intimate Partner Violence Among Adolescents and Young Adults
No fairy tale about bullying victims going on to become what they hated and becoming cruel abusers dealing with their mental trauma by traumatizing and hurting others. No bullshit about bullies just being kids who hated antisocial behaviour and worked to keep people normal. Just an admittance that people who were being were, surprise(!), not at risk of abusing someone, but of being abused, while bullies were at """risk""" of being abusers.
And of course, no gender differences were found. Whenever it comes to female violence or aggression, feminists, conservatives, red pillers and so on all agree that it is somehow completely different from male aggression, it is not the norm while the latter somehow is, it isn't as serious, it's not the same, it barely if at all happens, it's completely different and should be treated completely differently and blah blah blah. And then, the closer you look at it, objectively, the less actual differences you find.
Bullying as a Longitudinal Predictor of Adolescent Dating Violence
Jfl, turns out you don't even need to wait for adulthood for bullies to be the ones who become abusers. Also kek at race being over twice as big of a factor for direct bullying as gender. Holy fuck even I didn't expect that, let's see the leftists who on one hand take it for granted that race differences in crime and violence either don't exist, or when they do exist they are completely environmental and cultural, and then have no problem with double standards or misandry because "muh men are violent and a danger to helpless women" try to explain and deal with it.
They even tried selling an r of 0.08 as a significant correlation and predictor, even ChatGPT just dabbed on that when I asked it.
Now, the fact is that there are two different types of bullies. Pure bullies, who only bully and are not victimized themselves, and bully-victims, who bully and are themselves victimized. So is it possible that the myth of the weird bullied loner who then goes on to be a misogynistic monster in adulthood can still be resuscitated?
Lol no.
Examining explanations for the link between bullying perpetration and physical dating violence perpetration: Do they vary by bullying victimization?
It was only pure bullies whose bullying predicted later physical violence against dating/romantic partners. Not bully-victims. "Well, sure, the guy who made fun of you might have deserved being punched, but you've proven that you are just like him, a dangerous male who should stay away from pure, harmless women because you are an inherent danger to them and you will abuse them!" bullshit has once again been proven to be bullshit.
And, of course, once again there were no significant gender differences, the pattern quite clearly held for both boys and girls. But, of course, wait for everyone to minimize bullying and abuse done by girls and fearmonger about the scary lone losers who will never find a dating partner anyway.
:View: https://x.com/SimpNeelix/status/1849539119216755094
Normies On Twitter Shit On Bullied Manlet Told Him To Take It Up His Ass
View: https://x.com/T0kkume1/status/1857278532071956982 Told him to grow up as if you could control it what a shitty fallacious argument Society didn't decline because anti-bullying rules stopped people from being bullies. Society declined because anti-bullying zero tolerance rules...
incels.is
With the implicit justification that the bullied children are the real monsters who need to be beaten up and kept under control because they might turn out to be le evil inkwells who will abuse women
.
Ugly autistic 17-year old incel stabs manipulative bitch after rejection, normies dehumanize 'people who look like him'
The Rundown: An ugly autistic incel was rejected by some 15-year old slut who said she only 'saw him as a friend' ( AKA as an ugly clown ), he proceeded to take pictures of her while she was asleep, she raged at him to cut off all contact with her, he then went to her house at night and did...
incels.is
I've decided to see how true those beliefs are, especially when it comes to dating/domestic violence and abuse, which is one of the topics that really riles up normies. So, how do those claims of heroic bullies keeping society going and evil bullied kids wishing to destroy it and harm people hold up to reality? Not at all, it turns out.
School Bullying Perpetration and Other Childhood Risk Factors as Predictors of Adult Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration
An older but golden study showing that frequently bullying your peers as a child is by far the greatest predictor of being a domestic abuser as an adult, completely shaming all the other usual explanations such as being physically or sexually abused as a child, or witnessing domestic abuse in your own household as a child. Sure, those "abused becomes abuser", "cycle of violence" factors do matter, but being a bully is several times more important in this.
Speaking of that, just why are normies so obsessed with the idea that all violence, abuse and so on can be explained as a cycle? That everyone who is aggressive or violent is that way because someone else had harmed them before? That the actual bad thing about abuse is not the immediate harm, but that the abused child will inevitably go on to abuse someone else?
Are they just so terrified by the thought of the world not being just? By the idea that some people are nasty for no reason and dish out much more abuse than they take their entire lives, while some people are just lifelong victims through no fault of their own
?Anyway, let's look at something newer.
Longitudinal Associations Between Bullying and Intimate Partner Violence Among Adolescents and Young Adults
No fairy tale about bullying victims going on to become what they hated and becoming cruel abusers dealing with their mental trauma by traumatizing and hurting others. No bullshit about bullies just being kids who hated antisocial behaviour and worked to keep people normal. Just an admittance that people who were being were, surprise(!), not at risk of abusing someone, but of being abused, while bullies were at """risk""" of being abusers.
And of course, no gender differences were found. Whenever it comes to female violence or aggression, feminists, conservatives, red pillers and so on all agree that it is somehow completely different from male aggression, it is not the norm while the latter somehow is, it isn't as serious, it's not the same, it barely if at all happens, it's completely different and should be treated completely differently and blah blah blah. And then, the closer you look at it, objectively, the less actual differences you find
.Bullying as a Longitudinal Predictor of Adolescent Dating Violence
Jfl, turns out you don't even need to wait for adulthood for bullies to be the ones who become abusers
. Also kek at race being over twice as big of a factor for direct bullying as gender. Holy fuck even I didn't expect that, let's see the leftists who on one hand take it for granted that race differences in crime and violence either don't exist, or when they do exist they are completely environmental and cultural, and then have no problem with double standards or misandry because "muh men are violent and a danger to helpless women" try to explain and deal with it.They even tried selling an r of 0.08 as a significant correlation and predictor, even ChatGPT just dabbed on that when I asked it
.Now, the fact is that there are two different types of bullies. Pure bullies, who only bully and are not victimized themselves, and bully-victims, who bully and are themselves victimized. So is it possible that the myth of the weird bullied loner who then goes on to be a misogynistic monster in adulthood can still be resuscitated?
Lol no
.Examining explanations for the link between bullying perpetration and physical dating violence perpetration: Do they vary by bullying victimization?
It was only pure bullies whose bullying predicted later physical violence against dating/romantic partners. Not bully-victims. "Well, sure, the guy who made fun of you might have deserved being punched, but you've proven that you are just like him, a dangerous male who should stay away from pure, harmless women because you are an inherent danger to them and you will abuse them
!" bullshit has once again been proven to be bullshit.And, of course, once again there were no significant gender differences, the pattern quite clearly held for both boys and girls. But, of course, wait for everyone to minimize bullying and abuse done by girls and fearmonger about the scary lone losers who will never find a dating partner anyway.
Society when it does its best to demonize low-status bullied boys to protect people from them, only for it to do nothing because the high-status Chads and Stacies turn into abusers after growing up having bullied weaker people their entire lives:
@anandkonda @Regenerator @Mortis @Gendocel @VintageCarCoper @ItsovERfucks @Kina Hikikomori @Mecoja @prajeet88 @GeckoBus @DarkStar @sultryloser @Stupid Clown @Sloth Vs Kanga @weaselbomber @reveries @Epedaphic @KING NOTHING @Incline @Anarcho Nihilist @Nordicel94 @fatass30000 @Chudpreet @Left4DeadKoala @based_meme @Subhuman Trucel @LeFrenchCel @Da_Yunez @Grodd @The Scarlet Prince
