Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

It's Over becoming too internally blackpilled for this forum. Arguments are when the human is at their most biased, and being right is a cope

laanda

laanda

posts that seek to be liked are gay
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 8, 2021
Posts
1,464
why do we take pride over foids and normies being stupid
they're stupid. Why does that mean anything to my own life? I still go to bed alone.
people are stupid and it doesn't matter at all to prove I am better than them. It's just a cope to feel better. But what does it do for me? I need a gf, and I need enjoyable experiences. If I spend my time seeing a bunch of bluepill posts reshared here and then 10 users say 'now here is what is REALLY right', I am equally far away from both of those things. This is a blackpill beyond this forum.

All but sex is cope.

People are stupid. So what? You feel less sexless pain by not falling for one form of stupidity? I don't. And I see users fall for other forms of stupidity. And it's a cope to feel good about yourself for not believing in them, just to think 'well at least I have that. Muh cucks cucks cucks. People who have normal lives are cucks for soyciety. Ha! Stupid cucks, with their girlfriends. Sure they have sex but atleast I'm not bluepilled.'
We are not actually better than them. They are evil because they can be. And if you think you would not be stupid or evil in their place, that's a cope. Wanna know the un comfortable reality? They don't fucking care, because it does not matter, and if you care to be on the right side, you're coping. This was my opinion 5 years ago too, I remember it being so. Then I forsook it because I wanted some forum bros from extreme loneliness, but it's cope.

I'm not saying 'be bluepilled' I am saying, why does it matter, and I don't see why it is not bluepilled to care
how is being right about lookism even remotely even by a single percentage, a good compensation for no gf? I am still going to go to bed alone, eat the same food, and live the same way, but if I have an ego, I will feel better knowing that i am smarter than bluepillers. People are constantly inflating themselves above others and consistently take the path that paints them in the best light. When someone here says something like 'I'm 5'11 not 5'7', the 'I am the bigger truecel' coping begins. And the user defends themself. But why the fuck do people even care? Because the most beneficial thing to do is to use some strangers admission to be the bigger truecel. It's some of the most inane shit I've ever witnessed. There's only 1 way to benefit as the observer of someone doing that, and we all do it. Noone just says 'ah well who cares if he's fakecel'. Noone defends him if it doesn't benefit them. The monkey brain just urges us to point it out. Ultimately why does it comfort you to be more truecel when you are alone? Even if you are, it's meaningless. By the way I've never been called a fakecel on here because all my stats suck and I've never gotten anything. But people even assume if you defend someone else, you must for certain be doing it because you share the trait. And are defending yourself. Why? Because of the sheer amount of bias that is innate to the human mind. It's a fair assumption, seeing as everyone who makes that claim, that is infact the reason they are doing it. Humans are so biased. But, never been called a fakecel, that is not why I bring this up. It is just clearly about ego and bias.

I hate the way people argue too. Not just on here. I hate the way humans argue. I hate how if you are in an argument, people stop analyzing what is true and revert to a different mode, instead try to prove themselves right and process, mentally, but do not write, anything that suggests they aren't right. They leave it out. unbelievably biased. I hate the way people just kind of know, internally, when something proves them wrong, and they put it in their pocket, get over the fact they are wrong, and continue. I think all humans do this in argument because it places you in a win or lose situation and we are animals. I was not a member of some other community before this one nor did I participate in arguments. Infact all my arguments have been had here and to strangers on 4chan. I don't comment, I don't leave likes. But, all my life I have seen the human brain is never more biased than when it is in an argument. And winning gets you NOTHING. It's equally futile. If you try to win, you're doing it for ego, to be right, because if you are right, you get points. But, you gain nothing. I tried to win maybe 5-6 arguments in the last month, and this was because I have been having a bad time of things in my life, and I was coping. I regret all of them. I gained, NOTHING. At least I won't do it again. Hopefully. I believe evolutionary psychology is real. There is no prehistoric reason for a human to be able to analyze an argument without bias. We just apply our own self preservation to argument and go ooga ooga how me prove me right.

I am alone in this world. When you say that here, obviously it is taken to mean, I have no friends and no gf, due to context. But, users can at least come and read a bunch of water takes they already agree with, and feel comforted that people who do not benefit them at all, agree with what they say, and other people they do not know who do not benefit them, are bluepilled retards. I don't seem to care. I cannot really see the argument why doing that isn't bluepilled. It comforts you to know heh I am based. And at the end of the day, you still go to bed alone, whether you do this or not.

@Animecel2D you don't have to reply but I figure you will atleast read it even if you disagree. Truecel trait. I read basically everything. :fuk:
 
I envy a lot of normies
If I could live a normal life, why care about some people belonging to a internet back alley
What I do have a problem with is people invalidating my experience alongside data is on my side
But with the part of ego, why is it bad?
 
I envy a lot of normies
If I could live a normal life, why care about some people belonging to a internet back alley
What I do have a problem with is people invalidating my experience alongside data is on my side
But with the part of ego, why is it bad?
ego brings nothing but rage to incel. Atleast it has never brought me anything but that. I think it made me happier when I didn't care about people invalidating my experience, if I have nothing I value, they can't take it from me or anger me. There's nothing I can do to change everyones mind, and thinking about them invalidating it just pisses me off
 
It's a form of looking down at people as inferior to boost ones own ego, I probably have done it myself at times, it's a form of cope really, at times even a nice one.
 
It's a form of looking down at people as inferior to boost ones own ego, I probably have done it myself at times, it's a form of cope really, at times even a nice one.
funny you happened to bump this thread now considering it was buried. I just spent 20 minutes pointing out incel-benefitting bluepills plague this forum in another thread :feelskek:
i read something here today that said humans areego centric and it's sadly true. I think if you get your delusions for life shattered by the looks pill you have a fleeting opportunity to recognize the blackpill across other cases. I also think it is due to internet use that most people do not do this. A comforting reality is always more appealing. This site used to be full of people who were more blackpilled (not just nostalgia coping) and would regularly realize the brutality of this truth over and over but now it is mostly copers
 
a lot of words to say you're bluepilled
 
why do we take pride over foids and normies being stupid
they're stupid. Why does that mean anything to my own life? I still go to bed alone.
people are stupid and it doesn't matter at all to prove I am better than them. It's just a cope to feel better. But what does it do for me? I need a gf, and I need enjoyable experiences. If I spend my time seeing a bunch of bluepill posts reshared here and then 10 users say 'now here is what is REALLY right', I am equally far away from both of those things. This is a blackpill beyond this forum.

All but sex is cope.

People are stupid. So what? You feel less sexless pain by not falling for one form of stupidity? I don't. And I see users fall for other forms of stupidity. And it's a cope to feel good about yourself for not believing in them, just to think 'well at least I have that. Muh cucks cucks cucks. People who have normal lives are cucks for soyciety. Ha! Stupid cucks, with their girlfriends. Sure they have sex but atleast I'm not bluepilled.'
We are not actually better than them. They are evil because they can be. And if you think you would not be stupid or evil in their place, that's a cope. Wanna know the un comfortable reality? They don't fucking care, because it does not matter, and if you care to be on the right side, you're coping. This was my opinion 5 years ago too, I remember it being so. Then I forsook it because I wanted some forum bros from extreme loneliness, but it's cope.

I'm not saying 'be bluepilled' I am saying, why does it matter, and I don't see why it is not bluepilled to care
how is being right about lookism even remotely even by a single percentage, a good compensation for no gf? I am still going to go to bed alone, eat the same food, and live the same way, but if I have an ego, I will feel better knowing that i am smarter than bluepillers. People are constantly inflating themselves above others and consistently take the path that paints them in the best light. When someone here says something like 'I'm 5'11 not 5'7', the 'I am the bigger truecel' coping begins. And the user defends themself. But why the fuck do people even care? Because the most beneficial thing to do is to use some strangers admission to be the bigger truecel. It's some of the most inane shit I've ever witnessed. There's only 1 way to benefit as the observer of someone doing that, and we all do it. Noone just says 'ah well who cares if he's fakecel'. Noone defends him if it doesn't benefit them. The monkey brain just urges us to point it out. Ultimately why does it comfort you to be more truecel when you are alone? Even if you are, it's meaningless. By the way I've never been called a fakecel on here because all my stats suck and I've never gotten anything. But people even assume if you defend someone else, you must for certain be doing it because you share the trait. And are defending yourself. Why? Because of the sheer amount of bias that is innate to the human mind. It's a fair assumption, seeing as everyone who makes that claim, that is infact the reason they are doing it. Humans are so biased. But, never been called a fakecel, that is not why I bring this up. It is just clearly about ego and bias.

I hate the way people argue too. Not just on here. I hate the way humans argue. I hate how if you are in an argument, people stop analyzing what is true and revert to a different mode, instead try to prove themselves right and process, mentally, but do not write, anything that suggests they aren't right. They leave it out. unbelievably biased. I hate the way people just kind of know, internally, when something proves them wrong, and they put it in their pocket, get over the fact they are wrong, and continue. I think all humans do this in argument because it places you in a win or lose situation and we are animals. I was not a member of some other community before this one nor did I participate in arguments. Infact all my arguments have been had here and to strangers on 4chan. I don't comment, I don't leave likes. But, all my life I have seen the human brain is never more biased than when it is in an argument. And winning gets you NOTHING. It's equally futile. If you try to win, you're doing it for ego, to be right, because if you are right, you get points. But, you gain nothing. I tried to win maybe 5-6 arguments in the last month, and this was because I have been having a bad time of things in my life, and I was coping. I regret all of them. I gained, NOTHING. At least I won't do it again. Hopefully. I believe evolutionary psychology is real. There is no prehistoric reason for a human to be able to analyze an argument without bias. We just apply our own self preservation to argument and go ooga ooga how me prove me right.

I am alone in this world. When you say that here, obviously it is taken to mean, I have no friends and no gf, due to context. But, users can at least come and read a bunch of water takes they already agree with, and feel comforted that people who do not benefit them at all, agree with what they say, and other people they do not know who do not benefit them, are bluepilled retards. I don't seem to care. I cannot really see the argument why doing that isn't bluepilled. It comforts you to know heh I am based. And at the end of the day, you still go to bed alone, whether you do this or not.

@Animecel2D you don't have to reply but I figure you will atleast read it even if you disagree. Truecel trait. I read basically everything. :fuk:
why do we take pride over foids and normies being stupid
they're stupid. Why does that mean anything to my own life? I still go to bed alone.
people are stupid and it doesn't matter at all to prove I am better than them. It's just a cope to feel better. But what does it do for me? I need a gf, and I need enjoyable experiences. If I spend my time seeing a bunch of bluepill posts reshared here and then 10 users say 'now here is what is REALLY right', I am equally far away from both of those things. This is a blackpill beyond this forum.

All but sex is cope.

People are stupid. So what? You feel less sexless pain by not falling for one form of stupidity? I don't. And I see users fall for other forms of stupidity. And it's a cope to feel good about yourself for not believing in them, just to think 'well at least I have that. Muh cucks cucks cucks. People who have normal lives are cucks for soyciety. Ha! Stupid cucks, with their girlfriends. Sure they have sex but atleast I'm not bluepilled.'
We are not actually better than them. They are evil because they can be. And if you think you would not be stupid or evil in their place, that's a cope. Wanna know the un comfortable reality? They don't fucking care, because it does not matter, and if you care to be on the right side, you're coping. This was my opinion 5 years ago too, I remember it being so. Then I forsook it because I wanted some forum bros from extreme loneliness, but it's cope.

I'm not saying 'be bluepilled' I am saying, why does it matter, and I don't see why it is not bluepilled to care
how is being right about lookism even remotely even by a single percentage, a good compensation for no gf? I am still going to go to bed alone, eat the same food, and live the same way, but if I have an ego, I will feel better knowing that i am smarter than bluepillers. People are constantly inflating themselves above others and consistently take the path that paints them in the best light. When someone here says something like 'I'm 5'11 not 5'7', the 'I am the bigger truecel' coping begins. And the user defends themself. But why the fuck do people even care? Because the most beneficial thing to do is to use some strangers admission to be the bigger truecel. It's some of the most inane shit I've ever witnessed. There's only 1 way to benefit as the observer of someone doing that, and we all do it. Noone just says 'ah well who cares if he's fakecel'. Noone defends him if it doesn't benefit them. The monkey brain just urges us to point it out. Ultimately why does it comfort you to be more truecel when you are alone? Even if you are, it's meaningless. By the way I've never been called a fakecel on here because all my stats suck and I've never gotten anything. But people even assume if you defend someone else, you must for certain be doing it because you share the trait. And are defending yourself. Why? Because of the sheer amount of bias that is innate to the human mind. It's a fair assumption, seeing as everyone who makes that claim, that is infact the reason they are doing it. Humans are so biased. But, never been called a fakecel, that is not why I bring this up. It is just clearly about ego and bias.

I hate the way people argue too. Not just on here. I hate the way humans argue. I hate how if you are in an argument, people stop analyzing what is true and revert to a different mode, instead try to prove themselves right and process, mentally, but do not write, anything that suggests they aren't right. They leave it out. unbelievably biased. I hate the way people just kind of know, internally, when something proves them wrong, and they put it in their pocket, get over the fact they are wrong, and continue. I think all humans do this in argument because it places you in a win or lose situation and we are animals. I was not a member of some other community before this one nor did I participate in arguments. Infact all my arguments have been had here and to strangers on 4chan. I don't comment, I don't leave likes. But, all my life I have seen the human brain is never more biased than when it is in an argument. And winning gets you NOTHING. It's equally futile. If you try to win, you're doing it for ego, to be right, because if you are right, you get points. But, you gain nothing. I tried to win maybe 5-6 arguments in the last month, and this was because I have been having a bad time of things in my life, and I was coping. I regret all of them. I gained, NOTHING. At least I won't do it again. Hopefully. I believe evolutionary psychology is real. There is no prehistoric reason for a human to be able to analyze an argument without bias. We just apply our own self preservation to argument and go ooga ooga how me prove me right.

I am alone in this world. When you say that here, obviously it is taken to mean, I have no friends and no gf, due to context. But, users can at least come and read a bunch of water takes they already agree with, and feel comforted that people who do not benefit them at all, agree with what they say, and other people they do not know who do not benefit them, are bluepilled retards. I don't seem to care. I cannot really see the argument why doing that isn't bluepilled. It comforts you to know heh I am based. And at the end of the day, you still go to bed alone, whether you do this or not.

@Animecel2D you don't have to reply but I figure you will atleast read it even if you disagree. Truecel trait. I read basically everything. :fuk:
Nietzsche would call this “ressintiment” as in resentment from the frustration of the desire for revenge because you want what the blue pilled normies have (friendships, gfs etc.) it is born from weakness, inability to get revenge. If you cannot get material revenge then one seeks psychological revenge by creating a new morality which in this case is the black pill.
Blue pill (slave morality) is essentially master morality in disguise as slave morality

why do we take pride over foids and normies being stupid
they're stupid. Why does that mean anything to my own life? I still go to bed alone.
people are stupid and it doesn't matter at all to prove I am better than them. It's just a cope to feel better. But what does it do for me? I need a gf, and I need enjoyable experiences. If I spend my time seeing a bunch of bluepill posts reshared here and then 10 users say 'now here is what is REALLY right', I am equally far away from both of those things. This is a blackpill beyond this forum.

All but sex is cope.

People are stupid. So what? You feel less sexless pain by not falling for one form of stupidity? I don't. And I see users fall for other forms of stupidity. And it's a cope to feel good about yourself for not believing in them, just to think 'well at least I have that. Muh cucks cucks cucks. People who have normal lives are cucks for soyciety. Ha! Stupid cucks, with their girlfriends. Sure they have sex but atleast I'm not bluepilled.'
We are not actually better than them. They are evil because they can be. And if you think you would not be stupid or evil in their place, that's a cope. Wanna know the un comfortable reality? They don't fucking care, because it does not matter, and if you care to be on the right side, you're coping. This was my opinion 5 years ago too, I remember it being so. Then I forsook it because I wanted some forum bros from extreme loneliness, but it's cope.

I'm not saying 'be bluepilled' I am saying, why does it matter, and I don't see why it is not bluepilled to care
how is being right about lookism even remotely even by a single percentage, a good compensation for no gf? I am still going to go to bed alone, eat the same food, and live the same way, but if I have an ego, I will feel better knowing that i am smarter than bluepillers. People are constantly inflating themselves above others and consistently take the path that paints them in the best light. When someone here says something like 'I'm 5'11 not 5'7', the 'I am the bigger truecel' coping begins. And the user defends themself. But why the fuck do people even care? Because the most beneficial thing to do is to use some strangers admission to be the bigger truecel. It's some of the most inane shit I've ever witnessed. There's only 1 way to benefit as the observer of someone doing that, and we all do it. Noone just says 'ah well who cares if he's fakecel'. Noone defends him if it doesn't benefit them. The monkey brain just urges us to point it out. Ultimately why does it comfort you to be more truecel when you are alone? Even if you are, it's meaningless. By the way I've never been called a fakecel on here because all my stats suck and I've never gotten anything. But people even assume if you defend someone else, you must for certain be doing it because you share the trait. And are defending yourself. Why? Because of the sheer amount of bias that is innate to the human mind. It's a fair assumption, seeing as everyone who makes that claim, that is infact the reason they are doing it. Humans are so biased. But, never been called a fakecel, that is not why I bring this up. It is just clearly about ego and bias.

I hate the way people argue too. Not just on here. I hate the way humans argue. I hate how if you are in an argument, people stop analyzing what is true and revert to a different mode, instead try to prove themselves right and process, mentally, but do not write, anything that suggests they aren't right. They leave it out. unbelievably biased. I hate the way people just kind of know, internally, when something proves them wrong, and they put it in their pocket, get over the fact they are wrong, and continue. I think all humans do this in argument because it places you in a win or lose situation and we are animals. I was not a member of some other community before this one nor did I participate in arguments. Infact all my arguments have been had here and to strangers on 4chan. I don't comment, I don't leave likes. But, all my life I have seen the human brain is never more biased than when it is in an argument. And winning gets you NOTHING. It's equally futile. If you try to win, you're doing it for ego, to be right, because if you are right, you get points. But, you gain nothing. I tried to win maybe 5-6 arguments in the last month, and this was because I have been having a bad time of things in my life, and I was coping. I regret all of them. I gained, NOTHING. At least I won't do it again. Hopefully. I believe evolutionary psychology is real. There is no prehistoric reason for a human to be able to analyze an argument without bias. We just apply our own self preservation to argument and go ooga ooga how me prove me right.

I am alone in this world. When you say that here, obviously it is taken to mean, I have no friends and no gf, due to context. But, users can at least come and read a bunch of water takes they already agree with, and feel comforted that people who do not benefit them at all, agree with what they say, and other people they do not know who do not benefit them, are bluepilled retards. I don't seem to care. I cannot really see the argument why doing that isn't bluepilled. It comforts you to know heh I am based. And at the end of the day, you still go to bed alone, whether you do this or not.

@Animecel2D you don't have to reply but I figure you will atleast read it even if you disagree. Truecel trait. I read basically everything. :fuk:
It is indeed bluepilled behaving like that.
 
Like you've said, we haven't evolved to be logical or unbiased, we evolved to survive in this world, and evolution doesn't care about the objectivity of our critical thinking capability.

We are pawn of evolution. Just because we've created civilizations, doesn't make us free of our origin. And for that we will seek for tribe no matter what.

By your logic, even existence of this forum is a cope, and I don't deny that. Not only that, anything and everything I do is some kind of cope. If we believe that life is inherently meaningless, nothing we do can have any objective justification. Even our life itself.

"There is but one truly serious philosophical problem, and that is suicide. Judging whether life is or is
not worth living amounts to answering the fundamental question of philosophy. All the rest— whether
or not the world has three dimensions, whether the mind has nine or twelve categories—comes afterwards."


I think this quote from Camus is one of the most brutally true statement about human life.
 
You spent entire paragraph going on about how it doesn’t matter that normies are stupid (“being stupid” partly means believing things that are untrue) if they feel good:
why do we take pride over foids and normies being stupid
they're stupid. Why does that mean anything to my own life? I still go to bed alone.
people are stupid and it doesn't matter at all to prove I am better than them. It's just a cope to feel better. But what does it do for me? I need a gf, and I need enjoyable experiences. If I spend my time seeing a bunch of bluepill posts reshared here and then 10 users say 'now here is what is REALLY right', I am equally far away from both of those things. This is a blackpill beyond this forum.
And then you start going on about how you hate that people “stop analyzing what is true” and are only trying to make themselves feel good when arguing:
I hate the way people argue too. Not just on here. I hate the way humans argue. I hate how if you are in an argument, people stop analyzing what is true and revert to a different mode, instead try to prove themselves right and process, mentally, but do not write, anything that suggests they aren't right. They leave it out. unbelievably biased. I hate the way people just kind of know, internally, when something proves them wrong, and they put it in their pocket, get over the fact they are wrong, and continue. I think all humans do this in argument because it places you in a win or lose situation and we are animals.
Make up your mind, you either value the truth or you don’t, I think you got lost in da self-loathing sauce when writing this, many blackpillers do at some point and it always leads to goofy conclusions because it comes from emotional place full of masochistic feelings rather than logical one.

I remember some user going on similar “why does anything matter?” tirade few years ago and he started concluding that if you don’t let your dog fuck your gf then you’re making the dog an incel and because of it you’re no different than chad or something like that :lul:
 
You spent entire paragraph going on about how it doesn’t matter that normies are stupid (“being stupid” partly means believing things that are untrue) if they feel good:

And then you start going on about how you hate that people “stop analyzing what is true” and are only trying to make themselves feel good when arguing:
not even remotely accurate.

What you quoted states directly that it does not benefit my life to be more 'correct' than others. That's it. Not that it doesn't matter. And especially not that I think it's a good thing they do this. There's nothing in that statement that says I can't hate people for doing it. Purely, it says it doesn't bring material reward to my life. That absolutely can be true, while I hate them for doing it. Infact the second part of my post is all about how my most hated thing about humanity, is them doing exactly that thing.

I hate argument. Because this is the way it works. People start with a point in their head and then try to find a way that it is correct. Yours: 'I don't like this post, it criticizes something I like'. In an attempt to validate that, you become so blind and willing to find a path that proves what you want to believe (that it's wrong), that the fact you can't disprove the original statement does not matter. Fundamentally people just see shit in the way that will benefit their argument. You go from 'doesn't benefit' to 'doesn't matter' to 'is not a bad thing'. You don't realize that you did. Just like lookism deniers don't realize how they are wrong. You tack on 'if they feel good' which isn't something I said at all.

There's equal leaps on the other side. I said I hate a quality that is innate to argument. That says nothing about me hating the person who is being biased. Again it's just you needing that to be true for your argument. The statement is I hate a quality that is innate to argument. It does not mean I hate the person and you have to be in delusion to think that it does. Read the text you quoted.

What's ironic is you are actively doing what the text says people do in argument. You can't tell if your logic is bad or not. You just look for a way to validate the premise in your mind. You never disputed anything about the posts point. Does that not bother you at all? That you think it is wrong despite finding nothing illogical about the points it makes? But you leave thinking the post is wrong, by using ad hominem, making me into an unreliable author who contradicts himself. That way you don't have to prove the point wrong. That is ad hominem, discrediting the author, because you can't discredit the point. Which we've known for 2500 years is just a way to keep your opinion. But you aren't' even right about the contradiction JFL the BIAS an argument brings out is the fucking point of this thread.
Can you think of a way to dispute the point (that being correct about the things normies deny, does bring material reward to your own life)?

That's why I hate argument. Because this should have shown you that you were wrong. But no, you have a preference for feeling superior to normies, so you be biased, ignore it, and look for a way to validate what is already in your mind.

Something I didn't mention it in the post, is that it's even more of a cope to feel good about yourself for this reason if you actually do the same shit they do. They believe those things because they have bias. Here you are believing stupid shit makes sense in protection of an idea you are biased towards protecting. You do the same as them. Go ahead and find the best way to think you are right. The only point I half agree with is that by my own theory, I shouldn't have taken the time to try prove someone wrong because it doesn't benefit me if 1 idiot on a forum gets to consider if he was right. This didn't benefit me, so I shouldn't have bothered replying, or made the post to begin with, and I hate that I did. That is why blackpillers seem to post with self hatred. Because I shouldn't have accepted some guy I will never meet is a retard and spent my time on something else. Which is the point of this thread. Therefore I hate that I didn't follow the advice. Makes sense.
 
Last edited:
Make up your mind, you either value the truth or you don’t
both parts value the truth above lies from surface right to their core. I don't even see how you could think otherwise JFL
The truth; being right doesn't bring material reward to your life
The truth; Argument increases bias
The truth; Neither of these claims make you personally feel better about shit. Because feeling better about shit by lying is for bluepillers

thanks for bumping my thread so this forum of utter feelgood copers get a chance to read some non autofellating, anti biased truth > all, hard to swallow truth that doesn't benefit them. After all it was what this forum used to be

I'm sure in our age of internet addicts who have been validated constantly from the age of 3, it won't really convince anyone
 
Not that it doesn't matter. And especially not that I think it's a good thing they do this.
people are stupid and it doesn't matter at all to prove I am better than them. It's just a cope to feel better.
If it matters that they are stupid then why is feeling better than them cope? If I hate someone for doing something then it's normal that I feel better about myself for not doing said thing.
And what is this then:
Not that it doesn't matter. And especially not that I think it's a good thing they do this.
They don't fucking care, because it does not matter
And now that I think about it,
I need a gf, and I need enjoyable experiences. If I spend my time seeing a bunch of bluepill posts reshared here and then 10 users say 'now here is what is REALLY right', I am equally far away from both of those things.
What is even the correlation between the two? Would you have gf and enjoyable experiences if you weren't lurking here?
There's nothing in that statement that says I can't hate people for doing it.
Nothing in that says I hate them.
??? I didn't said that you hate people, I said that you hate way people are doing x:
And then you start going on about how you hate that people
I hate the way people argue too.

That is you going from what I said, to something that allows you to create a contradiction.
I didn't created any contradictions, you did.
I said I hate a quality that is innate to argument. That is a statement about argument, not people. It does not mean I hate the person and you have to be in delusion to think that it does.
Well again, you have to be in delusion to think that I said that you hate these people:
And then you start going on about how you hate that people
I don't even know why is "hating people" and "hating what they're doing" so important for you to distinguish in this case, but if it is then wtf is this supposed to mean:
while I hate them for doing it

Purely, it says it doesn't bring material reward to my life.
why do we take pride over foids and normies being stupid
Does something has to give material rewards to take pride in it? Again:
If I hate someone for doing something then it's normal that I feel better about myself for not doing said thing

I don't like this post
I don't like contradictions in this post, and I don't like contradicting yourself for the sake of pretentious self-mortification.
Instead you go from 'doesn't benefit' to 'doesn't matter' to 'is not a bad thing'
No I didn't :feelswhat:
That is ad hominem
You're doing same shit, making up what I wrote multiple times through the text:
Why would you think I want 'to let them do what makes them feel good'?

I'll be frank with you: it hurts my head reading your posts, everything contradicts itself, they're pretentious as fuck, full of oddly smug self-mortification and in your replies you nitpick tiniest shit while making even more contradictions, I'm not interested in arguing with you anymore.
Do you have any reason why the conclusion is goofy?
What I meant was that in general, people reach goofy conclusions when they're operating with similar reasoning to yours.
I could write 10-paragraph turbo "objective" pseudo-intellectual retardelard from "everything but sex is cope" point of view similar to what you wrote which would make logically sound argument as to why you're selfish entitled fuck if you're complaining on this forum but not satisfying your sexless frustartions with female dogs or gay men. You can logically hamster your way into anything with your way of thinking.
 
If it matters that they are stupid then why is feeling better than them cope

what does it do for me? I need a gf, and I need enjoyable experiences. If I spend my time seeing a bunch of bluepill posts reshared here and then 10 users say 'now here is what is REALLY right', I am equally far away from both of those things.
 
Why does that mean anything to my own life? I still go to bed alone.

your take on the first quote:
You spent entire paragraph going on about how it doesn’t matter that normies are stupid (“being stupid” partly means believing things that are untrue) if they feel good:
the clear, stated, unedited point of what you are replying to: What material gains do I get from feeling better
How does this ^ previous quote, represent that accurately
you go from 'doesn't benefit' to 'doesn't matter' to 'is not a bad thing'
No I didn't :feelswhat:
explain how you think you didn't JFL that's absolutely wrong. You did do that, here's the quotes
 
thanks for bumping my thread so this forum of utter feelgood copers get a chance to read some non autofellating, anti biased truth > all, hard to swallow truth that doesn't benefit them. After all it was what this forum used to be

I'm sure in our age of internet addicts who have been validated constantly from the age of 3, it won't really convince anyone
Never have I seen someone sniff their own farts on this forum so hard, I wouldn't even bother replying if I saw it first.
Sneed
 
You're doing same shit, making up what I wrote multiple times through the text:
I did not make up anything.
here is the example you alleged I made something up:
You tack on 'if they feel good' which isn't something I said at all.
here is what you said:
You spent entire paragraph going on about how it doesn’t matter that normies are stupid (“being stupid” partly means believing things that are untrue) if they feel good:
so you absolutely did do this. It wasn't mentioned in my post. You tacked it on. Coper.

and 1 is not multiple. obviously. So wrong and wrong again
 
Last edited:
Does something has to give material rewards to take pride in it? Again:
Explain to me how being right on the internet makes up for no gf / no intimacy and if it doesn't, why is it not a cope?
Never have I seen someone sniff their own farts on this forum so hard, I wouldn't even bother replying if I saw it first.
View attachment 1295900

if you can't honestly read what I said to you and come away thinking you aren't being insanely biased against something you don't like then I don't know how to convince you honestly. You still haven't said a single thing about why you think the point of the thread is wrong

You alleged I used ad hominem. I didn't. Not only that, even if I did, you didn't dispute that you did. It's just another excuse not to consider the argument I made, which was that you used ad hominem to avoid being wrong. Instead of having to deal with that, you just say 'err well you did too' and don't have to disprove what I said. And it's wrong because you did say shit.

oh also ad hominem doesn't mean lying. It means attacking the image of your opponent instead of their argument.
Cope from a coper.
 
It is obvious that users here boost themselves up to feel better, same applies for the hate of females here. But at the end it doesnt matter, being an incel is an awful experience and state to live and be in, better let them vent and soothe themselves. This trucel vs non trucel is a way for them to validate their experience, but none is being invalidated here. You seem to take to heart debates here very seriously.

It is a way to deal with the constant envy, all of it. Incels already know they are not superior by default. Discussions are pointless, no reason to have them, but why users here would do? Another cope to focus on, just like you did with your long post about it.
 

Similar threads

A.M.KANGA
Replies
2
Views
162
A.M.KANGA
A.M.KANGA
MasterHero
Replies
17
Views
224
Rasama
R
light
Replies
16
Views
276
MassEffectKoala
MassEffectKoala
Shinichi
Replies
2
Views
335
lil cel
lil cel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top