How the fuck do you turn this shit into a fucking foid empowerment shit? Nigga, foids have killed numerous offsprings throughout history to ensure their own survival.
Even with all the fucking pills and contraception they still go and nuke more babies than the number of WWII casualties in just one year. They go and have multiple abortions just to have one down syndrome kid at 40. Very Maternal. Muh maternal instinct is why birth rate is off a fucking cliff.
Besides,
foids in the past lived on average more or less as long as men did, since a lot of them used to kick the bucket while giving birth. Only in modern times, they live longer. So, idk which hole you pulled that evolution argument from.
And who told you foids are less suicidal. Foids in developed countries commit suicides at higher rates.
View attachment 1436564
Look at all the European countries above fucking North Korea.
Men don't engage in martyrdom. They engage in resource struggle. Most War-time soldiers weren't willing to be drafted. Because guess what they didn't want to be killed either. Unfortunately, men, unlike foids, cannot sleep their way into survival. Idk about foids, but looks like men have evolved to avoid using their head when talking about foids.
Also, how do you define "weak" in nature? A man in nature is strong because he has physical-strength advantage over foids? Calling a foid weak is like calling Genghis Khan weak because there were stronger men in his armies. They are not vulnerable. Foids worked in factories in grueling conditions, and they fought in Comanche tribes. Sure, the examples are few and far between but the point stands. Excusing foids' behaviors is like excusing the behaviors of literal fascists because after all they are fascists for their own survival.
It's contradictory in and of itself to say, 'selfish for survival because weak and vulnerable.' If you can afford to be selfish without consequences that means you have power.
More foid worshipping. The grandmas of the past were socially conditioned over a large period of time. Nowadays, you will hardly find a grandma who would be willing to babysit her grandchild(ren). For fuck's sake, that's the fucking reason we have babysitters in the first place. If grandmas are so fucking kind, so why don't they protest for their grandsons against this gyno-fascist regime? Muh 'grilling food' for neighbor as if they are erasing world hunger. I have hosted parties for my friends numerous times. Doesn't ascend me to some sainthood. I did it because I wanted to have fun. But if foids do it, it's some charitable endeavor.
@The Mistake of God 's larger point was foids are so selfish that they are willing to live to the troubles and deaths of the majority of others including children who are the fucking next generation. They are the biggest liability on earth.
@GeckoBus just look at this shit man.
very good and high iq points imo.
in evolution there is no weak or strong. What may seem weak to us can be strong in future. We dont know what is a good adaptation or not. It is also circular reasoning to make survival the metric. Consider this problem:
Evolution is survival of the fittest.
Who is fittest?
Those who survive?
Who survives?
The fittest.
In this model there is no definition for fitness. Anything that survives is by definition fit. We are fit. Anything that lives is fit cuz it lives. If evolution is true then there is nothing apart from evolution. Technology is evolution. But anyway.
Next, the "women are weak" argument operates on a reductionist view of reality.
Men are also weak as fuck compared to most animals, to the point where the strength difference between men and women is basically a useless criterion. Does it matter if you are a woman or a man when a 400 pound moose is charging you? No no guys, men have more upper body strength, they handle the 18 ton truck ramming them, evolution guys
If you look at how humans actually hunt, they make barely any use of their strength since most animals we hunt strength mog us anyway. We trap, we stalk, we trick, we poison. Men is a persistence hunter, a stalker, a sort of natural psychopath. We are creepy as fuck to most animals, a naked snail thing that watches you from a distance and takes notes, sometimes making porn of you that it faps to.
There are also native hunter gatherers like the pygmies that are like 4 feet tall manlets on average. Idk how that jives with the strength argument. Strength is not an advantage also because humans are not the fucking UFC. We exclusively work in groups. It does not matter if a single woman is weak if there are 200 women and 200 men and 40 children in a community. Who gives a fuck about strength at that point, its all about community effort, coordination etc.
This is also why all the evo-psych arguments about women needing a strong provider to protect them fall flat - women are not alone out there, looking for some lone male in the forest to help them survive. Every human by definition has at least 2 relatives, mom and dad. For evolution to work at all, you need a population of organisms that can reproduce. EVOLUTION DOES NOT WORK WITHOUT LARGE ENOUGH POPULATIONS, THERE IS NEVER, NEVER A 1V1 SCENARIO
Its never one man and one woman, its always dozens of men and women ensuring each other survival. This also is how modern society works, but people dont realize cuz hyper individualism is mental retardation. People think they are main chracter while wearing clothes made by 57 chinese sweat shop kids, driving on roads made by construction workers, eating food cooked by etnics in restaurants invented by a white man called Colonel Sanders, who started his empire cooking family meals for truckers at his petrol station - community community community, never ever do we experience this magical, 1v1 fighting and surviving scenario, its retardation.
So no, women are not more vulnerable, i dont think it matters to the 800lbs grizzly if you can bench 50kg or 100kg, because his left arm alone is 300kg and has the force to rip a car door off like hes plucking a leaf from a tree. Just study native american hunters, they relied so heavily on trickery that their hunting tech was massively inferior to european gear. For example native bows were utter shit, because they would sneak up on prey and shoot from very short distances. So they didnt develop eurpean level bow tech. They never relied on their physical strength to beat up animals, thats absurd.
Honestly, this whole "men strong, woman weak ooga booga" shit is just a male power fantasy, driven by some cope attachment to pseudo-masculinity. Its driven by the fear of loosing your male identity or something. As you wrote, who is stronger, the king or the soldier. Bill Gates is an old fart, I guess hes powerless because 14 year old gymbros can beat him up kek. Trump is old and weak, shieet, I mog him I guess shieet, hes so vulnerable shieet, he need secret service to protect him shieeet, Trump evolved to need protection sheeet.
Also, how do you define "weak" in nature? A man in nature is strong because he has physical-strength advantage over foids? Calling a foid weak is like calling Genghis Khan weak because there were stronger men in his armies. They are not vulnerable. Foids worked in factories in grueling conditions, and they fought in Comanche tribes. Sure, the examples are few and far between but the point stands. Excusing foids' behaviors is like excusing the behaviors of literal fascists because after all they are fascists for their own survival. It's contradictory in and of itself to say, 'selfish for survival because weak and vulnerable.' If you can afford to be selfish without consequences that means you have power.
In native tribes, if you are selfish, they kill you. Chronic narcissistic people, like psychopaths, stand out like sore thumb in communities that rely on high trust for survival, like military and native people. Last time I read up on this, it said when natives identity selfish narcs that threaten community, they throw them off a fucking cliff. If anything, these tribes engage in fuck tons of virtue signaling amongst each other, which includes food sharing etc, to maintain communal stability.
And if we look at actual, current cultures, thats exactly what we see. People are way mroe communcal and conformist than the opposite, we are just blinded to this because we take the communal, self sacrifical part of society for granted and only focus on our own hyper-individuality cope. We are all stuck in larger communcal systems. For every murder, there are millions that chose not to murder that day, even tho they could and thought about it. Nobody has to put groceries in the truck and drive them into the store, but they do anyway.
Selfisness unfolds on top of what I just described. People try to balance two things, that is maintaining the group coherence and on the other, rising inside the group hierachy. You can even see this in video games. Yes, you can just play the meta or use an exploit, but most video game communities frown on that. Why? Are games not about beating the game? Why do people get mad when you beat the game quicker? Because its not about winning, its about playing the game and rising in the social hiearchy without breaking the hierachy by overstepping social rules.
Oh, I want to adress women working - for all of history women participated in the work force, often dominating entire branches like beer production. They were never barred from it. Arguments like "women were physicall weak so they couldnt work cuz all work was physical" are absurd and ahistorical. In 1800s britain there was massive debate over "pit girls" - women that would work naked in coal mines all day. We also have data that a lot of women worked in agriculture and if you grew up in country side like me, you know that women historically worked alongside men in the fields. Only with the advent of the industrial revolution and massive standard of living boost could women stay home. Tradfags then project from this extreme, unprecedent time of prosperirty betwen 1880-1970 that this was the case for all of history. It was not.
People now complain about not being able to afford housing and etc - we are just going back to how your ancestors actually lived for most history, not owning shit and having to work for crumbs. Get used to it fuckers.
More foid worshipping. The grandmas of the past were socially conditioned over a large period of time. Nowadays, you will hardly find a grandma who would be willing to babysit her grandchild(ren). For fuck's sake, that's the fucking reason we have babysitters in the first place. If grandmas are so fucking kind, so why don't they protest for their grandsons against this gyno-fascist regime? Muh 'grilling food' for neighbor as if they are erasing world hunger. I have hosted parties for my friends numerous times. Doesn't ascend me to some sainthood. I did it because I wanted to have fun. But if foids do it, it's some charitable endeavor.
I would also add that the argument from grandma is a non-sequitur in the sense that this does not mean these grandmas were like that when young. Like people never change as they age, jfl, the fuck? We know that old people are hit the hardest by social isolation, especially old men. Their sui rate is high as fuck. How many fucking times have you seen normies say like, I dont get why my parents are so protective of my kids, when they used to beat me with a belt when I was young? Yee jolly whizz I wonder why. Fear of social isolation really does a number on a mofo doesnt it? Recall my earlier statements about virtue signalling to maintain in-group of community.
This is another example. Old people begin changing, adaptating their behavior to avoid social rejection. A young foid can act like a total cunt and still have friends. Chad can fart in a womans face and she will still be his girlfriend. This privilige fades as you get older and uglier, so people adapt by being nicer to compensate. So these grandmas werent necessarily raised to be nice, they were made to be nicer by circumstance.
Do you seriously think your 17 year old grandma would invite your ugly incel ass to BBQ with her?
www.g4media.ro
