DarkStar
nevER lose your smile⚡⚡
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2022
- Posts
- 26,178
Scandinavians and anglos areOnly Slavs are the real and most supreme whites
So Germans & French & Scottish+Irish aren't?Scandinavians and anglos are
DNR Self-hating cuck cope. Only Slavs are the real AryansScandinavians and anglos are
DNR Self-hating cuck cope. Only Slavs are the real Aryans
No Jfl.Only Slavs are the real and most supreme whites
Ancient South Russians were the first ones to call themselves Aryans like I saidNo Jfl.
I mean yeah Slavs are very based nowadays, and they do have various good historical achievements, but they're not the only "real aryans"
Germans yes, but French are too diverse and often looks more like Jewish.So Germans & French aren't?
No, all Yamnaya did:Ancient South Russians were the first ones to call themselves Aryans like I said
Phenotypically, the Yamnaya had mostly brown hair and brown eyes, while blue eyes, blond, and red hair were common among the Corded Ware and their descendants. The Indo-Iranian Andronovo peoples — who were descended predominately from the Corded Ware and partially from the Yamnaya — were almost entirely blond-haired and blue-eyed.
Cope JFL.Germans yes, but French are too diverse and often looks more like Jewish.
Slavs look Turkish.Only Slavs are the real and most supreme whites
No, all Yamnaya did:
View: https://imgur.com/6NbySfj
What is “White?” A guide for complete novices
A beginners guide to “White,” containing all of the basics you need to know. This extensive article includes information on genetics, culture, archaeology, anthropology, and the ancient…thuletide.wordpress.com
No they dont jflSlavs look Turkish.
Slavs are pontid, which means med with east baltid influence.No they dont jfl
They're Dinaric, East Baltic, and have some Nordic influence on them.
Turks are Armenoid, Anatolid, etc.
Greeks & Romans are very similar to modern populations in the region, at least Italians mainly the North ones where some of my ancestors came from are. Idk about Greeks.Source? Did Greeks and Romans call themselves "Aryan"? Only Indo-Iranians called themselves that, Indo-Iranian origin is Andronovo culture. So South Russians were the real Aryans
@Copexodius Maximus
North Pontid:Slavs are pontid
According to the phenos site, it's Mediterranid with some East Europid & Nordid., which means med with east baltid influence.
Pontids are still White & look very different from Turks; only a few Turks have that pheno.There are a lot of east baltids too, but it seems that there are more pontids than baltids among slavs.
When did they call themselves "Aryan" though?Greeks & Romans are very similar to modern populations in the region, at least Italians mainly the North ones where some of my ancestors came from are. Idk about Greeks.
They're mostly ANF/EEF, which is similar to it, but also carries some Steppe/Yamnaya.
I think some of their culture was inspired by it, but they refereed to themselves as "Latini" since this was many centuries after & they had diverged quite a bit.
View attachment 1204812
View attachment 1204813
What is “White?” A guide for complete novices
A beginners guide to “White,” containing all of the basics you need to know. This extensive article includes information on genetics, culture, archaeology, anthropology, and the ancient…thuletide.wordpress.com
its use as an ethnocultural self-designation is only attested among Indo-Iranian peoples and there is no evidence of its use as an ethnonym among 'Proto-Indo-Europeans'. In any case, scholars point out that, even in ancient times, the idea of being an Aryan was religious, cultural, and linguistic, not racial.
Man, this is exactly what an average russian looks like. I see a lot of them daily and like half of them look like this.
You mean immigrants?Man, this is exactly what an average russian looks like.
Cope jfl, they look like the ones I sharedI see a lot of them daily and like half of them look like this.
On the maps, GrAYtard, it shows this pheno is only common in Turkey & slightly in some adjacent regions.The pheno u posted before is quite typical too, but not as typical as this.
Way in the past.When did they call themselves "Aryan" though?
Proof of anyother Indo-Europeans except Indo-Iranians calling themselves Aryans?Way in the past.
It just means that the map is incorrect. I live among ethnic Russians, and this phenotype is very typical among them.On the maps, GrAYtard, it shows this pheno is only common in Turkey & slightly in some adjacent regions.
No it isn't,It just means that the map is incorrect.
They're probably Turk or Kavkaz immigrantsI live among ethnic Russians, and this phenotype is very typical among them.
No, it's notIm not saying that the pheno you posted is not typical, but this one is even more typical.
No.Slavs look Turkish.
Germans yes, but French are too diverse and often looks more like Jewish.
Exactly.
Most Russians will be East Baltid, with ofc some Volgid & Nordid influence on them.Exactly.
Looks Alpinid+Mediterranid White, compare him to the phenos I shared.I mean such types
Well yeah I like it, but it irks me how this thread got de-railed.This is such a wonderful ethnonationalist song. Its in my playlist.
tbhbut it irks me how this thread got de-railed.
Aryan = Indo-Iranian.Source? Did Greeks and Romans call themselves "Aryan"? Only Indo-Iranians called themselves that, Indo-Iranian origin is Andronovo culture. So South Russians were the real Aryans
@Copexodius Maximus
Source? Did Greeks and Romans call themselves "Aryan"? Only Indo-Iranians called themselves that, Indo-Iranian origin is Andronovo culture. So South Russians were the real Aryans
@Copexodius Maximus
They originated from the Yamnaya culture.Proof of anyother Indo-Europeans except Indo-Iranians calling themselves Aryans?
But they have roots in the Yamnaya culture:Aryan = Indo-Iranian.
And the origin of Indo-Iranians is Ancient South Russia. So Ancient Russians are the first AryansAryan = Indo-Iranian.
Yamnaya culture was (one of the hypothesis is that it was the origin of IE as well) Indo-European not Indo-Iranian. Indo-Iranian is just an branch of the whole treeThey originated from the Yamnaya culture.
Yes, modern Europeans and the Indo-Iranians have a common ancestor.But they have roots in the Yamnaya culture:
Which means that the term Aryan likely had some roots in the Yamnaya cultureYes, modern Europeans and the Indo-Iranians have a common ancestor.
probably not, since there is no occurrence of the term in any non indo-iranian language at all. The earliest Indo-Europeans reference to themselves are the Hittites who called themselves Neshians. The other ones all had different names for themselves as well. Not sure what the yamnaya would have called themselves, but that’s typical before writing became common. Lost to time.Which means that the term Aryan likely had some roots in the Yamnaya culture
Well it had roots there at the very least, since it stems from the Yamnaya language/cultureprobably not, since there is no occurrence of the term in any non indo-iranian language at all. The earliest Indo-Europeans reference to themselves are the Hittites who called themselves Neshians. The other ones all had different names for themselves as well. Not sure what the yamnaya would have called themselves, but that’s typical before writing became common. Lost to time.
probably not, since there is no occurrence of the term in any non indo-iranian language at all. The earliest Indo-Europeans reference to themselves are the Hittites who called themselves Neshians. The other ones all had different names for themselves as well. Not sure what the yamnaya would have called themselves, but that’s typical before writing became common. Lost to time.
Not really at all. Indo-Iranian branch is the most distant from the rest of Indo-European. Seems like they picked up a lot of native practices and language from BMAC people they interacted withWhich means that the term Aryan likely had some roots in the Yamnaya culture
"We waz Aryan and sheit ". Aryan = Indo-Iranian and nothing else. Like I said it's a misnomer term attributed to whole of Proto-Indo-European, when the evidence suggests it was only Indo-IranianWell it had roots there at the very least, since it stems from the Yamnaya language/culture
Do you know what the relationship was between ANE and yamnaya?Well it had roots there at the very least, since it stems from the Yamnaya language/culture
You are right, they call it the satem-centum divide in the IE family. But idk how much of if was due to mixture with BMAC and how much was just natural evolution.Not really at all. Indo-Iranian branch is the most distant from the rest of Indo-European. Seems like they picked up a lot of native practices and language from BMAC people they interacted with
"We waz Aryan and sheit ". Aryan = Indo-Iranian and nothing else. Like I said it's a misnomer term attributed to whole of Proto-Indo-European, when the evidence suggests it was only Indo-Iranian
I think it's agreed that Soma/Haoma and the fire rituals in Indo-Iranian religions are from BMAC. I think even most of the substrate in Proto-Indo-Iranian language was proposed to be from BMAC languageBut idk how much of if was due to mixture with BMAC and how much was just natural evolution.
Also I think the Anatolian hypothesis is getting more and more prominence. I think this would make sense more as Proto-Indo-European homeland than yamnaya, because even otherwise Sandniggers were the originators of the first civilizations and developments.Do you know what the relationship was between ANE and yamnaya?
You are right, they call it the satem-centum divide in the IE family. But idk how much of if was due to mixture with BMAC and how much was just natural evolution.
Anatolia back then was quite different from the modern region iircAlso I think the Anatolian hypothesis is getting more and more prominence. I think this would make sense more as Proto-Indo-European homeland than yamnaya, because even otherwise Sandniggers were the originators of the first civilizations and developments.
I thought it was the opposite, where the idea was more discredited. Afaik the theories keep pushing the IE further North and East.Also I think the Anatolian hypothesis is getting more and more prominence. I think this would make sense more as Proto-Indo-European homeland than yamnaya, because even otherwise Sandniggers were the originators of the first civilizations and developments.
I know it originates in that region, but idk it was a practice before the Aryans came into the region. What was the BMAC language? Cause afaik they are like the IVC but without the abo mixture.I think it's agreed that Soma/Haoma and the fire rituals in Indo-Iranian religions are from BMAC. I think even most of the substrate in Proto-Indo-Iranian language was proposed to be from BMAC language