Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Average men are incels

I agree with you only because I don't think the majority of men can AFFORD to betabux.

This could POSSIBLY have been true in the 40s/50s and so on when wages were higher (wages not being drown by women entering workplace and mass immigration) and women couldn't subsist on OnlyFans, but I don't think it's been true for a long time.


only because probably under 40% of men earn enough money to financially support a foid


that's low-IQ of you, women would def be okay getting financially supported by a guy and not fucking him, the question is what % of men actually put up with this

imagine people who think this...
...calling people who disagree the copers


source?

the only way this might be true on average WORLDWIDE is if places like china are possibly influencing the stats (women forced to work in rice fields, too poor for cell phone so no tinder) but def not true in the west

escortcels can "get laid" in theory too
the issue isn't "can" it's "are"
the hoops a nromy would need to jump through, he wouldn't have enough time left in the day to earn enough to betabux


You're assuming here that perceiving the # of incels being higher is universally better.

I feel it's more of a double-edged sword.

Like yeah: theoretical brethren to do an uprising, "hey look they managed to exist without roping, I can too" benefits

But the downside is this proces just how much lower the odds are.

If it's only 10% of men who are incels you can think "I'm just hovering around the 9th percentile, I can boost up to 11% and get a girlfriend"

But if it's 60%, then if you view yourself at the 9th percentile you have absolutely no hope because 11, 16, even 21 would be too far from the finish line.
Dude, things aren't the way you want them to be irl. Lot of guys here know incel-tier normies that got (their looksmatch) gfs just by socialmaxxing and being NT. You're just a delusionmaxxing retarded coper in this regard. UNDERSTAND AT LAST THAT ALMOST NO ONE HAS ANY PROBLEM REGARDING GETTING IN NON-BETABUXXING (CUZ ALMOST NO ONE IS RICH ENOUGH TO BE A BUXXER AT THE FIRST PLACE) ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS WITH GIRLS/WOMEN.
 
That avi omni-mogs me :feelsrope:
 
this guy had kids before he got on tv
1632772805345
 
Gigastacy and Stacy (9-10) only want gigachad (10)
Stacylite (8) will settle for mid-Chad (9)
Beckies (5-7) will settle for Chadlite (8)
sub-beckies (1-4) will settle for Brad (7)
guys 1-6 don't get settled for: they can only betabux
What about this?
Revo

Though again: only a small minority of the population is an "exact average" (ie only 1 in 100 men are between 49.5% and 50.5%) so it depends on how wide a variation from 50% you want to label as average.
I dunno. It's not like height or size. So, 5/10 in terms of appearance is just average-looking guys. They're the most common compared to the other types. I think it already includes all average-looking guys (so, some of them look slightly better or worse than others).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Stupid Clown
Replies
35
Views
389
prajeet88
P
S
Replies
68
Views
1K
SupremeGentleCel
S
ElliotMogger
Replies
13
Views
612
Buried Alive 2.0
Buried Alive 2.0
MisfitPerson
Replies
29
Views
1K
failedbbcnormie
F
canwefixit
Replies
4
Views
186
SteelCentaur
SteelCentaur

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top