Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment Attractiveness distribution of men

IncelKing

IncelKing

Chaos is a laddER
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Posts
9,849
I have created a normal distribution of male attractiveness, with mean of 5 points (average male is 5/10) and a standard deviation of 1.5 points

Attractiveness categories:

Incel


Truecel: 2 and below


 2


bottom 2.28% of male population is True-cel



Incel: > 2 - 3.5

 2 to  1


13.59 % of the male population are incel


Normie

Low-tier normie: > 3.5 - 4.5

Normie: 4.6 - 5.4

Upper-tier normie: 5.5 - < 6.5

1


middle 68.27 % of the population are in the Normie Category (including all normie subcategories - lower, middle and upper tier normies)

Chad-lites and Chad

Chad-lite: 6.5 - < 8

1 to 2


13.59% of the male population is chad-lite

Chad: 8+

2more


top 2.28% of the male population is Chad
 
Last edited:
most people are not 5s. I think the average should be around 3.5-4
 
most people are not 5s. I think the average should be around 3.5-4

low IQ. attractiveness ranges from 0 to 10, so in a normal distribution 5 is the mean/median
 
It looks pretty balanced. Based mathematics back at it again.
 
This is simple gaussian distribution. Whats the point?
 
Looks balanced and accurate, nice chart man.
 
chad is 3 standard deviations above, not just 2

even women on reddit admit to finding less than 1% of men attractive
 
chad is 3 standard deviations above, not just 2

even women on reddit admit to finding less than 1% of men attractive

I'd say chad is 2 standard deviations above. Giga-chad is 3 standard deviations above (keep in mind being 3 standard deviations above mean = top 0.15%)
It looks pretty balanced. Based mathematics back at it again.

Looks balanced and accurate, nice chart man.

Thanks
 
This is all pretty obvious.

Are you a stemcel gook that enjoys creating graphs by chance?
 
According to women, you would be right

Objectively, 5 is average. But Subjectively, based on rising female standards, average male is a 4
 
good chart if i have to be honest, looks so balanced
 
Mean of 5 and a standard deviation of 1.5?

The problem with your model is that I don't think SMV is accurately modeled by a normal distribution.

Women prioritize certain traits found only in a small minority of men, and other men get docked heavily for not having most, if not all of those traits. Therefore it would be a right-skewed distribution where the mean is closer to 4, if not 3.5.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top