Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Attractive people are objectively smarter (genetically superior) than unattractive people

"The National Child Development Study (NCDS) includes all babies born during the week of 03-09 March 1958 in Great Britain (England, Wales, and Scotland), and has followed them for more than half a century throughout their lives. When the children were 7 and again when they were 11, their teachers were asked to describe them physically. For the purpose of the analysis below, the children are defined to be attractive if they were described as attractive at both age 7 and age 11. They were defined to be unattractive otherwise. 62% of the NCDS respondents are coded as attractive. Their intelligence is measured with 11 different cognitive tests at three different ages (7, 11, and 16). NCDS has the best measure of general intelligence available in any large-scale survey data.

As the graph below shows, attractive NCDS respondents are significantly more intelligent than unattractive NCDS respondents. Attractive NCDS respondents have the mean IQ of 104.23, whereas unattractive NCDS respondents have the mean IQ of 91.81. The difference between them is 12.42. "

It is truly over if you are ugly and ended up on this forum. We are not only uglier than beautiful people but also dumber on average. 12.5 iq points difference, more than a SD.
JFL at this life

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/.../beautiful-people-really-are-more-intelligent
 

Attachments

  • 51424-41418.jpg
    51424-41418.jpg
    9.6 KB · Views: 3,592
Those are studies on kids, not adults. If you look at 99% of men with phd's, they're all incel tier.
not surprising
although at the age of 11 i was a handsome kid, puberty fucked me up really really bad
That study is nonsense because it was done on 11 year olds.
So since women have much higher SMV than men, I suppose they are smarter ?

Give me a break.

I'm not buying any of this.

But even if this were true, so fucking what ?

If Chad is so smart, why does he take my money to raise his kids ?

All I'm asking, is not to be cucked. If these attractive people are so superior to us, why do they need our taxes for everything they do ? Public education, subsidized reproductive healthcare, welfare to single mothers... all of this has to end.

Chad needs to finance his harem by himself. Since he's so smart, I'm sure he'll figure out a way. Unless of course the way he found is to force us to pay.

Well if that's the case he's not going to get away with it for ever. He may be smart, but we're more numerous. All it would take is for us all to wake up to the cuckolding we're subjected to.
 
Last edited:
I still mog them to oblivion in this regard tbh
 
reminder that handsome men put 1% of the effort in intellectual pursuits that average to ugly men do, and beautiful women put 0.00000000001%
 
Foids don't let ''inferior'' people to pass their genes. That's eugenics for me.
Natural selection pressure has been lowered ... have you noticed degenerates reproducing en masse? yeah. Infant mortality rate is also extremely low nowadays.
 
Last edited:
I don't think there's any correlation between strict intellectual capacity and looks. You can be handsome and a genius, ugly and a genius, ugly and retarded, good looking and retarded.

Undoubtedly though better looking people get better socialized which enables them to go further in life. Those who are genetically lower and / or have mental issues will ultimately struggle and not reach their full capacity, whatever it could have been.
 
Maybe because their brain development wasnt stunted by receiving the necessary attention, ways to deal with their hormones (teen love) and validation. Unlike many men who are left trying to figure out what went wrong for decades to come while also having to face the harsh demands of life without any support or guidance. That is why.
 
Maybe because their brain development wasnt stunted by receiving the necessary attention, ways to deal with their hormones (teen love) and validation. Unlike many men who are left trying to figure out what went wrong for decades to come while also having to face the harsh demands of life without any support or guidance. That is why.
 
There's book smart and there's street smart.

Not literally, per se, but most of us are book smart. We read what people say online, and we read what people say on twitter, and we can see the hypocrisy of people. We are extremely observant of others.

Then there's street smart. These people know how to cheat. They know how to make people feel good or bad. Most Chads are this. They can manipulate and sell whatever and foids will get their pussies all wet and have this desire to do anything to fuck the Chad.

Like the reason why the spelling bee champions, the math whizz, the engineer, etc. are fucking nerds and near incels unless they are mad rich as fuck. There's a reason why Chads get all the young pussy while going to fucking University of Alabama or West Virginia University, a school with a 71.9% acceptance rate.

This is why we have high IQ but we don't get pussy.
 
Natural selection pressure has been lowered ... have you noticed degenerates reproducing en masse? yeah. Infant mortality rate is also extremely low nowadays.
Degenerates or low iq reproduce more cause standard of living are noticable higher than 100 or 200. Think about it. 300 or even 100 years ago africa population was low as fuck, cause mortality of infants. Now due to western medicine healthcare they don't have high newborns death rate, but still have their high reproduction rate. Same with brown people ( Arabs, Turks, Persians or Indians ) they were in same situation like africans couple centuries ago. Cause they have lower iq and thanks to white man empathy ( stupidity ) they have high populations. Plus also it's worth to mention that high iq people didn't have a lot of kids...only maqnificient scholar with big amount of children is leonhard euler...Da vinci, Newton, Tesla never had children and didn't pass their genes.
 
If many incels and other rejects are smart it's because rejection makes you cope and the best and easiest cope is book smarts. Especially in a system that pretends education is most important and most valuable to a successful, happy, and healthy life (we all know that's not the case from first hand experience).
 
Foids don't let ''inferior'' people to pass their genes. That's eugenics for me.

But females themselves can have inferior genes (most of them actually do)

It's not that black and white too. My father has bad genes but my mother has good genes, meanwhile my uncle has good genes but his wife has bad genes (such bad decision), however, I'd say that traits like fluid intelligence (aka IQ), phenotype and midface tends to come from the mother, not father.
 
Last edited:
Either way the logic behind this cliche BS argument is flawed, it could very well be (in fact it is my position) that its the treatment and attention that attractive people get that propels them forward in live in positive ways, they have an endless stream of positive reinforcement, that leads to good mental health and motivation to keep to their studies, whereas the ugly children get treated worse, so they are depressed and want to work less, not to mention they see the good looking ones getting treated better and they hate the unfairness and that demotivates them even further, over the years the gap between them and good looking people just becomes exponentially wider due to this snow ball effect
 
reminder that handsome men put 1% of the effort in intellectual pursuits that average to ugly men do, and beautiful women put 0.00000000001%
That would mean beautiful foids who go to harvard are a million times smarter than incels who gets in.
 
I would think so as attractiveness is supposed to be a marker of genetic quality. People don’t have the same combined amount of skills and abilities. People who say so do it to virtue signal or to support inferiority supremacism.
 
OP being retarded as usual. Literally picking one study and basing an entire thread on it just to fuel his self hatred and retardation.
 
They sure seem smarter, and are better at surface skills and things that make you look smart without being smart.

Most smart people are incellish even though it's not always due to looks. Being smart in the book-smart change the world sense is not the kind of smart average people when talking about smart. They mean street smart, social smart, and just a small amount of book smart that doesn't leak into conversations or interactions.
 
OP being retarded as usual. Literally picking one study and basing an entire thread on it just to fuel his self hatred and retardation.
What about those ugly incels who have depression, brain fog and mental illness. They develop these and become low IQ due to looks.
 
k this is unlocked again, epic
one more reason this is off the mark, beautiful genetically superior people that aren't models and go into academics, will form couples and families and their academic output will drop precipitiously once they have kids, they just won't give a fuck about it anymore, only incels can afford lifelong dedication to an intellectual cause
 
That makes a lot of sense, doesn't it? Intelligence is genetically determined due to multiple variants; attractiveness is also genetically determined. It's not weird to assume that good looking people win at every aspect in life.
But this is complete bullocks.
In curry land all the good looking people are in all the groups and shit. But they're not neccessarily more intelligent. They're just in a huge circle jerk.
 
But this is complete bullocks.
In curry land all the good looking people are in all the groups and shit. But they're not neccessarily more intelligent. They're just in a huge circle jerk.
Yeah, they're usually better off financially speaking, I guess. I haven't spent much time in curryland myself to know the dynamics. All I know is that middle-class and upper-class femorrhoids were all trying to be like western girls.
 
Yeah, they're usually better off financially speaking, I guess. I haven't spent much time in curryland myself to know the dynamics. All I know is that middle-class and upper-class femorrhoids were all trying to be like western girls.
The thing about those shit skin whores is that no matter how much they do this kinda shit, they will never be white. They will always be the Hindu-Muslim pajeet whore they always were. They have no true appreciation for western civilization other than chad's cock.

They call me coconut when I say I don't want to wear traditional clothing or do their customs. I used to be offended by the whole coconut thing until recently. Until a friend pointed out that the coconut actually suits me more. I'm brown on the outside and white on the inside. But these whores are like boxes of ferrero rocher. They look all nice with golden ribbons and so on, but when you open them it's fucking barfi or something.
 
Do you guys realize the fact that attractive people, while they can get better job oportunities, or in 3rd world, they just barely get a job. Whereas ugly looking people don't have much opportunities. The problem isn't IQ per se, but the social rewards/opportunities, and it seem it isn't distributed fairly in our society. You can be a genius or dumb, but if you don't have enough social abilites+looks, you are discarded.
I'm going to give random numbers to emphasize on the odds I've seen.

High IQ+abilites(social+skills)+looks=98% of getting high rewards(a job with a good income)
Normal IQ+normal abilites+normal looks=70%
Low IQ+no abilites+uglyness=3% or 0% depending where you live.

Obviously different combinations give various results, above was just some sort of framework to get the idea of what's going on. This applies both for men and women, sadly, men have more social pressure since it's seen as a taboo a man not suceeding at everything. Yep, Weltanschauung for you :)
 
Last edited:
Yes I have noticed this. Some attractive ones in my class easily study and got good marks. While I studied hard like a Donkey only to get below average marks.
 
Yeah I noticed this as well . My highschool the attractive people were fairly smart .
 
"The National Child Development Study (NCDS) includes all babies born during the week of 03-09 March 1958 in Great Britain (England, Wales, and Scotland), and has followed them for more than half a century throughout their lives. When the children were 7 and again when they were 11, their teachers were asked to describe them physically. For the purpose of the analysis below, the children are defined to be attractive if they were described as attractive at both age 7 and age 11. They were defined to be unattractive otherwise. 62% of the NCDS respondents are coded as attractive. Their intelligence is measured with 11 different cognitive tests at three different ages (7, 11, and 16). NCDS has the best measure of general intelligence available in any large-scale survey data.

As the graph below shows, attractive NCDS respondents are significantly more intelligent than unattractive NCDS respondents. Attractive NCDS respondents have the mean IQ of 104.23, whereas unattractive NCDS respondents have the mean IQ of 91.81. The difference between them is 12.42. "

It is truly over if you are ugly and ended up on this forum. We are not only uglier than beautiful people but also dumber on average. 12.5 iq points difference, more than a SD.
JFL at this life

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/.../beautiful-people-really-are-more-intelligent
From asking in incel vc groups in discord im guessing that most of this forums birthdays are in april. never started tbh
 
Last edited:
This is exactly why I joined this forum . Absolute Blackpill.
 
I'm not sure where the myth of more attractive people being dumber came from, but it goes against all logic if you know anything about evolutionary biology (except maybe in the case of white women, but that's a whole other can of worms).

The only silver lining you could say exists is the fact that a lot of uglier people make up for their lack of success/social experiences by investing their time into productive things such as education. Perhaps that's why there's a belief that why they seem to be more successful later on. Or maybe it's just the fact that the most highly educated and successful groups are ethnics from places like India, which makes them considerably uglier on average, thus creating the impression that all ugly people follow this path, and not just a handful of groups.
 
Of course they are -- it's Darwinism coming into play. They usually were the bullies in school also. They know they can get away with it because they're destined for nothing but success.
 
Those are studies on kids, not adults. If you look at 99% of men with phd's, they're all incel tier.

That study is nonsense because it was done on 11 year olds.
 
GOD DAMN I FUCKING HATE ATTRACTIVE PEOPLE FUCKERS RUINED MY FUCKING LIFE!
 
@Atavistic Autist thoughts? (if u havent replied already, i cba to check whether u have)
 
JFL @ "Beautiful people got nothing going on upstairs!" Copers. This was the original cope from averagecels since humanity unfortunately started.

Good looking, well formed people have a superior body... this includes brain, vision, and athletic ability, cognitive function, bone development etc. It's so stupid to assume that a genetically superior person doesn't also have a genetically superior brain.
This 100%
Whoops totally forgot I already posted to this, shit
 
Most chads Ive talked to were NOT neurotypical but had dark triad personalities and high intelligence, they are usually blackpilled and they KNOW that their looks are the reason of their success. Normies and (most) ugly people are usually stupid and bluepilled. Although ugly men are either stupid or very smart, generally
 
Jfl brutal if you weren't chad at 7 years old you're genetic trash.
 
Did anyone ever notice when they were or are in school that the teachers always spent more time on the good-looking students, thinking they had potential, and viewed the incel students as stupid and a waste of time and never gave them the same amount of attention or support?
 

Similar threads

Jason Voorhees
Replies
54
Views
691
anandkonda
anandkonda
Confessor
Replies
30
Views
264
curryboy420
curryboy420
db-bchr-iv
Replies
10
Views
482
SoycuckGodOfReddit
SoycuckGodOfReddit
SandNiggerKANG
Replies
18
Views
200
SandNiggerKANG
SandNiggerKANG

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top