Not everygirl is different but they are individuals which means they have microdifferences at the very least.
Girls are inclined to value the same things. But the degree in which they value something is dependent on thei perceived confidence/ social status.
The general tendency is towards more of the novelty of high value rather than application. A girl will wanna fuck a buff masculine tall dude who doesn't even fight at all just because of the implied social novelty, and what I call "high tier individual particular unchangeable feature set, HTIPUFS" Where the person has unchangeable features that make him the tyrannarch, dominator. Relying on application, on having to try is the very reason girls don't find men attractive who have to do it. Like 5'6 manlets at the gym. Women like guys who can dominate with doing the least, and his halo carries his social power/ dominance streak because of the social, genetic package of being good looking and of sharp, intellectual, adroit aspects.
Being adorned for example in face, body, etc. subcommunicates adroitness. If you lead by that it's what women want more than being a hardneck in life. Women want immaculateness.
It's what might be called "circumsupplied substance". It's the halo effect in motion. Being good looking, or having unchangeable distinct characteristics is believed to have things go your way. Just because you're distinguished, and the lineage value that leads up to being good looking (which is hard) must have everything else taken care of.
It's looking at things from the difficulty of individual attainment with high competence, and not having things of individual aspect with low competence.
Physioform difficulty PFD makes things that take effort below it seem like they're taken care of. At least people want to believe that. Mankind wants to believe in hierarchies living superficialistically. Because no one wants to live in reality. Supporting fantasy is the reason we are looking at people sheerly at looks today.
A lowvalue girl will be tricked by beta cucks who collectively platform her in a carousel of validation.
Because of that her reward system (fueled by primal human vanity) will esteem things like love, kindness, compassion, genuine confidence, etc. less for all things except things of a more hierarchal material like
It is the desire for everyone in America in general to want to live an inclusive existence.
Why do generals matter?
Laws are made on the basis of dealing with things in a general way.
It has been a grievous but inescapable ill on mankind that laws cannot deal with everything micromanagingly.
Order must be passed down on what "generally" needs maintenance.
Laws are things made in mayors offices to create an osmosis everyone must follow to keep human primality at bay.
On what generally works.
This aspect of law is called the legislational limit of reach, LLOR. And general laws are the ways to clean up the mess. Much like how perfection is unattainable so maxxing things for order, stability is needed.
For example, it's not illegal in some states for anyone on someone's residence to be shot. But what about the people who are lost? Laws must lean order to another because security is needed over grey area leaning. Because of the cynicism and uptightness of the government.
Precautions should be taken in regards to the general existence of women. Ease for outliers do not outweigh the positive in securing a general negative.
The reward system of a girl will naturally incline itself to more unchangeable value. Which shows it has the more difficult and possibly rare distinguishment. You cannot change height, eye color, body frame. These things become a novelty because of that. And women will not just look for who has these things, although they have good value. But they will look for the most distinguished among them if that's their reward system.
A girl can be spoiled on legit value or stubbornly spoiled amidst being low value. It depends on their reward system.
Feeling low value, insecurity will mean there is some incel based opportunity, or low tier guy in some way, not chad.
Girls are inclined to value the same things. But the degree in which they value something is dependent on thei perceived confidence/ social status.
The general tendency is towards more of the novelty of high value rather than application. A girl will wanna fuck a buff masculine tall dude who doesn't even fight at all just because of the implied social novelty, and what I call "high tier individual particular unchangeable feature set, HTIPUFS" Where the person has unchangeable features that make him the tyrannarch, dominator. Relying on application, on having to try is the very reason girls don't find men attractive who have to do it. Like 5'6 manlets at the gym. Women like guys who can dominate with doing the least, and his halo carries his social power/ dominance streak because of the social, genetic package of being good looking and of sharp, intellectual, adroit aspects.
Being adorned for example in face, body, etc. subcommunicates adroitness. If you lead by that it's what women want more than being a hardneck in life. Women want immaculateness.
It's what might be called "circumsupplied substance". It's the halo effect in motion. Being good looking, or having unchangeable distinct characteristics is believed to have things go your way. Just because you're distinguished, and the lineage value that leads up to being good looking (which is hard) must have everything else taken care of.
It's looking at things from the difficulty of individual attainment with high competence, and not having things of individual aspect with low competence.
Physioform difficulty PFD makes things that take effort below it seem like they're taken care of. At least people want to believe that. Mankind wants to believe in hierarchies living superficialistically. Because no one wants to live in reality. Supporting fantasy is the reason we are looking at people sheerly at looks today.
A lowvalue girl will be tricked by beta cucks who collectively platform her in a carousel of validation.
Because of that her reward system (fueled by primal human vanity) will esteem things like love, kindness, compassion, genuine confidence, etc. less for all things except things of a more hierarchal material like
It is the desire for everyone in America in general to want to live an inclusive existence.
Why do generals matter?
Laws are made on the basis of dealing with things in a general way.
It has been a grievous but inescapable ill on mankind that laws cannot deal with everything micromanagingly.
Order must be passed down on what "generally" needs maintenance.
Laws are things made in mayors offices to create an osmosis everyone must follow to keep human primality at bay.
On what generally works.
This aspect of law is called the legislational limit of reach, LLOR. And general laws are the ways to clean up the mess. Much like how perfection is unattainable so maxxing things for order, stability is needed.
For example, it's not illegal in some states for anyone on someone's residence to be shot. But what about the people who are lost? Laws must lean order to another because security is needed over grey area leaning. Because of the cynicism and uptightness of the government.
Precautions should be taken in regards to the general existence of women. Ease for outliers do not outweigh the positive in securing a general negative.
The reward system of a girl will naturally incline itself to more unchangeable value. Which shows it has the more difficult and possibly rare distinguishment. You cannot change height, eye color, body frame. These things become a novelty because of that. And women will not just look for who has these things, although they have good value. But they will look for the most distinguished among them if that's their reward system.
A girl can be spoiled on legit value or stubbornly spoiled amidst being low value. It depends on their reward system.
Feeling low value, insecurity will mean there is some incel based opportunity, or low tier guy in some way, not chad.
Last edited:
