extravirginoliveoil said:
where you ever really a trucel if your able to ascend- wether it be through gymcelling, moneymaxxing etc.? real Inceldom should be inescapable. Perhaps surgerymaxxing could be an exception but femoids could probably sense second rate genetics from a mile away.
Human interactions are well described by normal distributions (skewed ones too). Inceldom truly is a numbers game, the question is, at which level do we define true inceldom?
First idea for a definition:
Given that an average human might have interactions with about N number of humans (say 10,000) , half that are women, and about halve that will be women at an age that could potentially be romantically interested to him, lets call it W= N/4. Given the option to accept a date with you, which is the percentage P of women would agree to give you a chance (aka you pass their lower boundary for looks (dateability condition)).
A true incel is defined, as any male for which that percentage P < 0.5* W , AKA the probability of him meeting a woman throughout his life that would date him is lower than 50%.
Given some numbers (N = 10000) and using tinder to correlate the dateability condition to the attractiveness ranking (in %) you get something like about 2% of all males are true incels according to this definition.