Leftists have abandoned the working class.
They never really were for the working class. They always pretended to be, yet all their policies have only ever hurt the working class. I can't think of a single policy of theirs that ever benefitted the working class.
No, the modern economy isn't shaped like that. Most of that stuff has been outsourced.
Leftists are so annyoing.
Though I can understand not being left-leaning on social issues, how exactly would deregulation, spending, and tax cuts benefit the working class?
Deregulation allows businesses to enhance productivity, and enhancing marginal productivity is how wage increases happen. In countries with heavy regulation, not only are businesses less productive and have to divert more resources to compliance, but it’s harder for businesses to hire people.
Third position isn’t as good as capitalism
Wouldn't allowing deregulation hurt the workers, though? I personally believe that by letting corporations run wild like that would result in things like safety standards in the work place would fuck their employee's over? I do agree that tax cuts for businesses can be beneficial, but not so much for large corporations. I think it can be helpful for smaller businesses as it would stimulate local economies.
Safety standard regulations make it more costly for workers to hire people and thus make it harder for workers to find a job. There was one point where I was desperate for a job, any job, I begged construction sites to hire me but none would. I was so confused, why wouldn’t they want extra help for someone willing to give it to them? I eventually asked why to a guy who was honest with me:
Free market capitalism is the most pro working class
Free market capitalism is merely a tool used to exploit people, which NS fought against.capitalism
united fruit company go brrrrrrrrr
The world lost the 2nd world war.
True. Both sides of the same Jewish coin
www.economicshelp.org
Capitalism doesn’t exploit anyone except potentially the business owners since they can just be undercut by competitors.
China admitted that those trains costed more than they will provide in economic return. You’re looking at the destruction of wealth there. If the trains actually contributed more to society than their cost, the free market would have already driven businesses to build them in pursuit of profit.
There's nothing stopping competitors from forming alliances or assassinating each other in a truly free market.
In capitalism anyone can become the lord or aristocrat if they choose to work
a governent train network has more benefits than just gdp.
Yeah, that’s the market signalling the real cost of transportation. That cost wasn’t absent before, it was just paid for by the tax payers through subsidization. If something is to be paid for by someone, it may as well be the person benefitting. Why should people who don’t use the trains be paying for the people who do use the train?UK privatized the railway. Prices shot up.
Rail Privatisation - Success or Failure? - Economics Help
https://youtu.be/2xwnt1CgkU0 In the Victorian age, the UK led the world in building railways, it was an invention that changed the world. But, by the 1980s, the state owned British Railways was the butt of jokes, stale sandwiches, declining passengers and closed lines. The railways just couldn’t...
Is the rule of Chad in the sexual marketplace the most pro incel, as those at the top of the food chain get to rule over reproductive capital?
Because transportation is a important part of a society. There are things that are not only GDP related.
I think they made some good points.
One obvious benefit of high-density urban dwelling with public transport vs low density urban dwelling with no public transport:
Capitalism is not a zero sum game like the sexual market is. In capitalism, a laboror can convert his labor into capital through savings and investment and become the Chad. In the sexual market place, not only is wealth zero sum (limited females to males) but it's genetically determined.
Why can't everyone just pay for themselves. I don't get taxed... and therefore I can keep my money and pay for my own medical bill, my own transportaiton, my own degree.
Everything in life is determined by genetics and epigenetics.
People like you in the 1960s probably campaigned for sexual freedom, believing that sexual liberation would make sex more accessible, and many fools believed it. What do we see in 60 years? The free sex market has become beneficial only to women and only to top men, and the rest have lost. Your libertarian propaganda is something like that and is designed for the dumb.
A completely free capitalist market or a completely free sexual market always benefits only the top 10-20%, the rest lose.
Except it’s not fairytale. In capitalism even the lowest level worker can become rich if we just earmarks a small % of his income and invests in the S&P500. It’s not even a probability, it’s just math.
Women are a zero sum good, it’s not comparable to wealth that can be created through human effort. Capitalism, when applied, benefits the poor more than the rich. The rich get slightly richer but the poor get uplifted by orders of maginutde.
Agree with you (except in market capitalism), woke people are always high class or middle high class, they are richfags who have everything so they have to invent stupid revolutions and retarded politics like troons and BLM.
A lot of that is because of Civil Rights legislation that forces universities and corporation's to be woke and DEI. Under free market capitalism Wokeism would die
Because they sold themselves for money, that leftist politicians are being paid to divert attention from something real, such as increasing economic inequality, and instead deal with the problem of racism, the problem of oppression of women, the problem of oppression of LGBT people and other shit. Leftist politicians, like any other politicians, are simply corrupt.
Frankfurt school has ruined everything
You are wrong at this, woke left is ultracapitalist, why do you think it has the complete support of the media, TV, and it's literally the mainstream ideology? It has mixed completely with the capitalist system.
It's just that the rich and large corporations pay leftist politicians money to keep their mouths shut.
Do you think George Soros is a commie? Obviously not.
I believe it is more like a doctrinal change in the western left that happened in the late XX century, but of course large corporations have supported this too since they don't see this new left as a threat anymore.
The kikes are not for the working class.
I am becoming more and more convinced that politicians of any kind are unscrupulous liars who will sell their mother for money, and they will sell their audience and voters even more so.
Economic Inequality isn’t “real” to the extent it is a problem. It’s a distraction. Left wing politicians divert your attention on “billionnaires” and “wealth inequality” to distract from social issues like culture degeneration and feminism. It’s known throughout history that sinister regimes always use a scapegoat to divert the masses attention away from the real issues. In the modern world that scapegoat is “multinational corporations” and the “super rich”
