Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Are we the epitome of Dunning Kruger?

LaFayette

LaFayette

I had 300 showers. My disability wasn't washed out
-
Joined
Sep 10, 2020
Posts
237
Are we all stupid on top of being ugly? If we had a higher IQ wouldn't we be able to "go around" our ugliness and statusmaxx, even from a very young age?
 
Another GrAYcel quality thread. Why do you bother infiltrating here?
 
I might be stupid.
 
I am not trying to infiltrate. It is a genuine question, and I included myself.
 
I am stupid. I lost every aspect of the genetic lottery.
 
I dont think what you are referring to is the dunning kruger effect, at least thats how I'm interpreting this.
 
I dont think what you are referring to is the dunning kruger effect, at least thats how I'm interpreting this.
Considering that most of us blame our failure solely on looks, and are convinced that it is only looks that have value, and base our philosophy around that, I can't see how it is not Dunning Krueger.
 
Harvey Weinstein statusmaxed like a Roman general. Didn't help him out did it? Ugly is ugly. Just look at Weinsteins victims speech:. All say he was a pig ugly man and they in no way whatsoever found him attractive enough for consensual sex.
 
Harvey Weinstein statusmaxed like a Roman general. Didn't help him out did it? Ugly is ugly. Just look at Weinsteins victims speech:. All say he was a pig ugly man and they in no way whatsoever found him attractive enough for consensual sex.
That's one. However he technically wasnt incel.
 
Are we all stupid on top of being ugly? If we had a higher IQ wouldn't we be able to "go around" our ugliness and statusmaxx, even from a very young age?
What makes you think this.

If we were all dumb as per se, then you wouldn't be able to understand the blackpill and its scientific nature unless of course you were blackpilled through simple phrases that attracted you very emotionally.

On top of that, you seem to think statusmaxxing is going to save you. There is one richcel here and he's smart if by going off his avi, that still hasn't got into a relationship yet.

Considering that most of us blame our failure solely on looks, and are convinced that it is only looks that have value, and base our philosophy around that, I can't see how it is not Dunning Krueger.
Quite the opposite, Looks is everything if you eliminate status, civis, money etc.

If you were to go back to ancient human periods, who do you think will get more lays?
Chad sapien or Virgin sapien

There is already studies done on babies that determine that looks > everything.
 
What makes you think this.

If we were all dumb as per se, then you wouldn't be able to understand the blackpill and its scientific nature unless of course you were blackpilled through simple phrases that attracted you very emotionally.

On top of that, you seem to think statusmaxxing is going to save you. There is one richcel here and he's smart if by going off his avi, that still hasn't got into a relationship yet.


Quite the opposite, Looks is everything if you eliminate status, civis, money etc.

If you were to go back to ancient human periods, who do you think will get more lays?
Chad sapien or Virgin sapien
The thread I made was in line with the rest of my posts. What makes me wonder if this is the case, is that most people I know that acquire and master skills easily, do end up attracting girls. Guitar, poetry, painting, proramming you name it....and some of them are manlets.
Even the Incel Wiki/Scientific blackpill states that IQ and attractiveness positively correlate up around 120.
 
Ugly=stress=diminished brainpower
& not getting laid=hormonal imbalance=stressed=brain damage

Only bluepilled monkcels are not stupid. The rest of us, though not born stupid necessarily, have some serious brain fog
 
Ugly=stress=diminished brainpower
& not getting laid=hormonal imbalance=stressed=brain damage

Only bluepilled monkcels are not stupid. The rest of us, though not born stupid necessarily, have some serious brain fog
I get your reasoning, but I am still terrified at the idea that we were born unintelligent. I suffer from brain fog/blank mind, and I did included myself in this post. I just dont seem to learn...
 
That's one. However he technically wasnt incel.

Do you think his wife was handing it out like free donuts? Baha. Probably had sexless marriage.
 
I get your reasoning, but I am still terrified at the idea that we were born unintelligent. I suffer from brain fog/blank mind, and I did included myself in this post. I just dont seem to learn...
Bad genes can extend to the mind probably I grant you that much
 
It's the opposite

Every prediction made about women and society on here is continually proven whilst normies predictions always come up flat or incomplete
 
The thread I made was in line with the rest of my posts. What makes me wonder if this is the case, is that most people I know that acquire and master skills easily, do end up attracting girls. Guitar, poetry, painting, proramming you name it....and some of them are manlets.
>programming
>attracting girls
I don't see how unless betabuxx

Also define these "other people" in regards to how they look.
It's a possibility they aren't ugly or deformed.

Additionally, if you want to talk about money wise, though I would bring up the race study on this, which is that being ethnics having to earn more to settle with a wife in comparison to a chad or white. Now I don't remember exactly what the target female was or whether there was no target female in regards to race, but imagine that study but only with just the looks spectrum for whites. It's more than likely that a Danny Devito would have to be a middle income earner to get lays in comparison to Chad who can easily be a bum and still get picked up on the streets, clean and fresh with a gf and a job, or still be a bum and fuck girls constant.
 
I'm more like Freddy.
 
>programming
>attracting girls
I don't see how unless betabuxx

Also define these "other people" in regards to how they look.
It's a possibility they aren't ugly or deformed.

Additionally, if you want to talk about money wise, though I would bring up the race study on this, which is that being ethnics having to earn more to settle with a wife in comparison to a chad or white. Now I don't remember exactly what the target female was or whether there was no target female in regards to race, but imagine that study but only with just the looks spectrum for whites. It's more than likely that a Danny Devito would have to be a middle income earner to get lays in comparison to Chad who can easily be a bum and still get picked up on the streets, clean and fresh with a gf and a job, or still be a bum and fuck girls constant.
They are normie tier in regards to looks, but manlets (5'5).
 
Im actually smart ngl

Theres different levels like

1. Youre so stupid that you think youre smart
2. Youre stupid and you know it
3. Youre so smart that you know youre stupid
4. Youre so smart that you know youre smart

Im #4
 
I'm high IQ with good career and moneymaxxed yet still incel. See the thread in "must read content" about money and woman. It doesn't help, except if SEAmaxxing or escortmaxxing.
 
Intelligence isn't some fix-all attribute for everything in life.
You can be the smartest asshole in the world but if something kills your motivation you aren't going to do shit with it. And after a few years of LDAR'ing your brain will be depleted to mush from the isolation and depression. It's like poison.

I think the only ones free from this are the nearly savant level spergs because they can focus on their interests to blot out the pain of social rejection, or they're so damn autistic they simply don't give a hoot.
 
so what's the point of this shit thread then
The point of this thread is that many ppl here (including myself) seem to be low aptitude, considering what we discussed in other similar threads. Maybe it is bevause of environmental factors, like being the reject from a very young age, but truth be told there are people that due to higher aptitude, did manage to statusmaxx from a very young age.
 
I will pm u
I won't respond because this thread has ticked me off a bit and I'm not in the state to even respond yet I stupidly clicked on this thread.
 
I won't respond because this thread has ticked me off a bit and I'm not in the state to even respond yet I stupidly clicked on this thread.
I will pm you photos, not gonna start a long discussion.
 
The point of this thread is that many ppl here (including myself) seem to be low aptitude, considering what we discussed in other similar threads. Maybe it is bevause of environmental factors, like being the reject from a very young age, but truth be told there are people that due to higher aptitude, did manage to statusmaxx from a very young age.
Betabuxxing is worse than inceldom
If you include betabuxx as ascension, then you can "ascend" yourself and get cheated on and divorced 3 or 4 years from now.
Looks is the key to career success unless you're a high IQ STEMcel or are already rich and have invested.
 
More Freddy Krueger effect
 

Similar threads

CEO of beta eyes
Replies
41
Views
519
over_department
over_department
CEO of beta eyes
Replies
12
Views
181
VideoGameCoper
VideoGameCoper
over_department
Replies
8
Views
229
curryboy420
curryboy420
BSGMANLET
Replies
6
Views
146
BSGMANLET
BSGMANLET

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top