Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Are we really losers and bottom of the barrel, or just unlucky due to being born in the wrong timeline?

Justanotherbloke

Justanotherbloke

Major
Joined
Oct 26, 2024
Posts
2,017
Title?
I have nothing to add to this, it´s a question I ask myself off weekly..
Guess most of us would have had a solid chance of having a wife, family with a purpose if we were born in the late 40s.
I don´t really view myself or you guys as losers, some of us are hard working, kind and willing to put in the work if we had prospects of
a good dating life.
Guess we are just screwed over, cause our generation is born in the exact wrong timeline, where we experience the peak of the consequences of
the sexual revolution, feminism, gender wars and hypergamy.
 
it depends. if you're nurodivergent I would say you really are "bottom of the barrel" as in you would always have a hard time socially ascending, but if you're below average looking you're just unlucky
 
This reasons too, but im also a lazy piece of bum
 
it depends. if you're nurodivergent I would say you really are bottom of the barrel, but if you're below average looking you're just unlucky
Im not diagnosed but would not rule it out, or be surprised if Id be nonNT
 
Was I born in the wrong timeline?
 
I lost the genetic lottery. Have always been an outcast to an extent outside of when I was a toddler
 
Im not diagnosed but would not rule it out, or be surprised if Id be nonNT
I think I'm nonNT as well. I'm a curry which severely limits by ability to ascend but I think my not-so-great social skills and introversion is really what done it for me
 
I lost the genetic lottery. Have always been an outcast to an extent outside of when I was a toddler
Same here very introverted, dont like socializing and big crowds of people, but I dont think that would have a huge impact on my dating life
If I were born in the 40s, and dated within a somewhat familiar community/environment or village where everybody knows eachother.
I am able to ´open myself up´ more, but with todays shit society that feels uncomfortable, thus I never did it and was always an outcast
 
Last edited:
Online dating and tiktok is what really killed everything. Back in the day foids were forced to choose a man from their near area (plus, foids used to be shamed for being single, just like men are today)
 
Wrong sex.
Wrong genes.
Wrong upbringing.
Wrong culture.
Wrong era.

It's not over. It never even began! :feelsohgod:
 
I would be Chad if I had been born a few decades ago (in my area)
 
I an physically disabled, I am even lucky to be born in this timeline…
 
I am a complete abomination, a living piece of shit, I wasn't simply "unlucky", there are so many layers to my sub-humanity that I would be unsuccessful in any possible timeline.
 
I am certain its something to do with de-population. Logically, it's impossible to not be
able to attract every woman in the world, the numbers are too high. But something is
definitely going wrong, every dating app no replies, every female i ask out its a no.

I don't know what it is yet - but something is very wrong. I know women are being
a bit picky over the past 10 years, but its getting kind of ridiculous. Something on
this level, points towards a very tyrannical and corrupt government.

All I see on MSN is de-population, pro chad propaganda. It does make me feel
the American governments/UK/Germany etc are leading the propaganda.
 
Last edited:
I don't really think my experience would be different back in time, mostly because it's not a physical issue but mental.
 
Wrong timeline for most of us.

In previous generations, it really was as easy as have a steady job, take care of yourself and 99% of men found a partner. May not have been a great partner, but at least there was incentive to stay with you.

Also agree that the erosion of community has greatly pushed us all to be introverted, and for men it's not a choice anymore.
 
Online dating and tiktok is what really killed everything. Back in the day foids were forced to choose a man from their near area (plus, foids used to be shamed for being single, just like men are today)
online dating really put the last nail in the coffin... no turning back from this point cause pandoras box is now open, females tasted what it feels like to literally have hundreds (if not thousands) of men pursuing them, on those garbage apps.
Ban snapchat, instagram too please.
 
online dating really put the last nail in the coffin... no turning back from this point cause pandoras box is now open, females tasted what it feels like to literally have hundreds (if not thousands) of men pursuing them, on those garbage apps.
Ban snapchat, instagram too please.
Ban all social media, or turn them to the state that they were in back in 2000-2010, that was the sweet spot. Before it got ultra mainstream and cancerous
 
I'm ugly, manlet and sperg. I am at the bottom of the barrel, but many here are just unlucky to have been born in the age of the internet
 
Ban all social media, or turn them to the state that they were in back in 2000-2010, that was the sweet spot. Before it got ultra mainstream and cancerous
Agreed. Can't even begin to describe how toxic mainstream social media is nowadays.
 
I am certain its something to do with de-population. Logically, it's impossible to not be
able to attract every woman in the world, the numbers are too high. But something is
definitely going wrong, every dating app no replies, every female i ask out its a no.

I don't know what it is yet - but something is very wrong. I know women are being
a bit picky over the past 10 years, but its getting kind of ridiculous. Something on
this level, points towards a very tyrannical and corrupt government.

All I see on MSN is de-population, pro chad propaganda. It does make me feel
the American governments/UK/Germany etc are leading the propaganda.
Couldn´t agree more, very well put and glad to come across like minded individuals on here.
Most will call it cope here, but lately ive been doing more research on the topics you just mentioned
about the government, higher ups or Satanic elite with their depopulation agenda.
I know what you mean when you say ´something feels wrong´.
When I hear about dating and watch all the video´s online and even hear from normie NPC co-workers how ´women are a liability, not worth it and dating is hard´, it´s like some dark negative entity currently has a strong demonic grip over the world and women, governments most certainly know more about this.
I find it funny that they argue and whine over the tiniest things, but won´t address the problems of the current dating market and male/female relationships that are going to hell in a handbasket currently.
 
Agreed. Can't even begin to describe how toxic mainstream social media is nowadays.
I think keeping whatsapp, telegram etc are fine. You somehow need to stay in touch with business related contacts, family members etc.
But titok, SkankChat and instaslut all revolve around consumerism, people aren´t on there for meaningful connections
but for self promoting, fueling their narcissistic ego, profit and whoring around
 
Ugly people were always discriminated against.


"Ugly laws" were municipal ordinances in the United States that prohibited individuals with visible disabilities or disfigurements from appearing in public spaces. These laws, active from the late 19th century into the 20th century, reflect a dark chapter in American history, highlighting societal attitudes toward disability and public space.


The first "ugly law" was enacted in San Francisco in 1867, officially known as Order No. 873. This ordinance banned "street begging" and prohibited individuals deemed "unsightly or disgusting" from appearing in public. Similar laws were adopted by other cities, including Chicago, which passed its own ordinance in 1881. These laws targeted people with visible disabilities, such as those who were "diseased, maimed, mutilated, or in any way deformed."

Enforcement of these laws varied, but they often led to the arrest and removal of individuals with disabilities from public spaces. The primary justification for these ordinances was the desire to maintain public aesthetics and prevent the "unsightly" from disturbing the public. This perspective reflects a broader societal tendency to marginalize those who deviate from perceived norms of beauty and health.

Over time, "ugly laws" faced increasing criticism for their discriminatory nature. Activists and advocates for people with disabilities highlighted the laws' role in perpetuating stigma and exclusion. The repeal of these ordinances began in the mid-20th century, with Chicago being one of the last cities to remove its "ugly law" in 1974.



The existence of "ugly laws" underscores the historical marginalization of individuals with disabilities and the societal emphasis on physical appearance. Reflecting on this history is crucial for understanding the evolution of disability rights and the ongoing challenges in achieving full inclusion and equality for all individuals, regardless of appearance or ability.
 
Some people here are some people aren't I'd say
 
Reflecting on this history is crucial for understanding the evolution of disability rights and the ongoing challenges in achieving full inclusion and equality for all individuals, regardless of appearance or ability.
Bluepillers won’t do this
 
I am a loser but the combo with timing killed me.
 
I was born in the wrong world. No timeline would save me. The only thing that would save me is good bones and good genetics.
 
I’m bottom of the barrel

biggest mistake was not being born in the wrong time but being born at all
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top