Discussion Are we incels primarily victims of eugenics or dysgenics?

[wereq.feelsdevil]

If we're victims of eugenics then we are the way we are because of discrimination and exclusion due to society determining that we lack the genetics needed to participate in society.

But if we're victims of dysgenics, then we are the way we are not because of society's discrimination but rather because of our parents' lack of discrimination in mate selection which led to the dilution and ruin of our genes.

Which one do you think it is?

 

[Sir Waco]

female sexual selection which is dysgenics

 

[boneless goblin]

none.
its just luck and how shitty human life can be .
aliens control us and our genes and everything and use us thier mules to create an ideal earth for their arrivall

 

[Fantasea]

primarily victims of being born too early to experience giga stacy waifu sex bots

 

[lowz1r]

We were simply born at the worst time possible. Our ancestors were not subject to eugenics because back then, men still had choosing power.

So we inherited their shit genes only to be bombarded by the sexual revolution.
Our genes don’t stand a chance in this modern era. We are the genetic dead ends.

 

[AdolfRizzler]

We were simply born at the worst time possible. Our ancestors were not subject to eugenics because back then, men still had choosing power.

So we inherited their shit genes only to be bombarded by the sexual revolution.
Our genes don’t stand a chance in this modern era. We are the genetic dead ends.

 

[lowz1r]

primarily victims of being born too early to experience giga stacy waifu sex bots

Waifu sex bots are my last remaining cope

 

[AdExpress]

primarily victims of being born too early to experience giga stacy waifu sex bots

crazy how it will probably be like the real thing in -50 years damn it we were born too late to have nuclear family too

 

[Mixedcel59]

female sexual selection which is dysgenics

Agreed, Women of all kinds get to have kids even when the have genetic disorders and they usually choose violent men to mate with.

 

[Sir Waco]

and they usually choose violent men to mate with.

this is what i was refering to ye

 

[caineturbat2003]

I believe it's dysgenics for 3 reasons.

1. For people dealing with disease or any other undesireable traits, eugenics would have spared us this gruesome fate and probably would have been born in much better and highly functional households than we currently are. Meanwhile dysgenics condemned us a lifetime of pain and misery. So idk how someone wouldn't dispise their own incompetent genetics.

2. It wouldn't be evolutionary beneficial for society to discriminately target people solely based on looks. Think of how many potential doctors, engineers, scientists, etc society would lose because it's filled with lookist scumbags. Society would crumble from within. It would be like natural selection, but for an entire race or species. A healthy society would be filled with highly moral, trustful individuals.

3. Same like the 2nd point, but with foids. Foids never look for men that exhibit high intelligence or virtuous traits. They always search for low impulse control, dark triad, dumb, thugmaxxed and aggressive animals. I wouldn't go into full detail on it, but we both know that @DarkStar made some points for why these traits aren't beneficial for survival.

 

[zzzzzzb]

Definitely dysgenics. Real eugenic practices and laws haven't been tried for generations now. We just got dealt the worst hand in life and it doesn't help that women have way more social power today.