I don’t think so. I think the natural state of humans is the most violent and beautiful man gets all the women. What are your thoughts?
I want an army of sex slaves so no
R
at least with monogamy most men can get wives
No back in the Stone Age the Chad impregnated multiple women at a time because he had to reproduce as many times as possible before he died same with women they will monkey branch to the next man
Ü
Yes we are. Polygamous primates have large testes. Animals who observe monogamous relationship patterns have smaller testes in relation to their size. We fit the latter description. Don’t let anyone try and tell you that chad harems were ever supposed to exist.
What about chimpanzee’s and gorilla’s? Are they monogamous?
Then why did chad harems exist?
Ü
No. Dey hav de veri big tezticles
Ü
Because of human intuition, not nature. They do not reflect the normal human mating pattern.
human intuition is human nature
Sorry if this is a low IQ question, but what do you mean by “testes” in your previous post? What impact does it have on whether a species follow a monogamous vs polygamous breeding pattern?
Ü
I suppose
Ü
More sperm = can fuck more females
M
I believe it varies. Men are biologically supposed to spread their seed to as many wombs as possible to carry on their genes, however women are biologically designed to settle with a single man and raise their child. Monogamy is important for maintaining the healthy development of a child as both parents are needed for them to come out as a functioning adult. I believe that males are biologically not sexually monogamous however they are supposed to be when it comes to love.
obviously not. if that was true there would not be any slayers and sluts.
on a second thought, both are natural
I hate nature
Monogamy is a mating strategy, I'd say that perhaps 20% of people are hardwired for monogamy, perhaps more perhaps less, but different mating strategies are successful in different environments. If your society is not monogamous and cheating carries death then it makes sense that toilets that really, really want to cheat and get caught get killed and die. I remember watching an Iranian Chadfisher who got only a few toilets that immediately wanted to sleep with him, though he did have significantly more matches. Attraction is universal, sluttiness apparently isn't.
This isn't excusing Iranian toilets, human females have concealed ovulation for a reason.
This isn't excusing Iranian toilets, human females have concealed ovulation for a reason.
Humans were only monogamous due to limited resources, every ruler in history had harems and concubines.
S
Genetically, absolutely not.
Monogamy was the price humans had to pay in order to evolve.
Civilization was made possible by beta males finally having a chance for a more or less respected, if not guaranteed opportunity to get tied to a female, have sex with her regularly and reproduce. Male infighting that so far had been mostly motivated by competing for resources and females turned into co-operation as alpha males (officially) restricted themselves to monogamy, so beta males would no longer try to constantly take arms against them, as the promise of sex, a secure romantic relationship and having their own family gave them motivation to contribute to society under the leadership of alphas (who of course continued to form harems, but not in a sanctioned, rather in an unoffical way).
Monogamy was the price humans had to pay in order to evolve.
Civilization was made possible by beta males finally having a chance for a more or less respected, if not guaranteed opportunity to get tied to a female, have sex with her regularly and reproduce. Male infighting that so far had been mostly motivated by competing for resources and females turned into co-operation as alpha males (officially) restricted themselves to monogamy, so beta males would no longer try to constantly take arms against them, as the promise of sex, a secure romantic relationship and having their own family gave them motivation to contribute to society under the leadership of alphas (who of course continued to form harems, but not in a sanctioned, rather in an unoffical way).
Probably, from what I understand monogamy was mostly the norm everywhere but polygamy and harams were only a thing the ruling class(like kings and emperors) did in any kind of abundance. Just being a tallfag with a good jawline didn't mean you could fuck every woman in the village while most men rotted like you can today.
The fuck will know, whatever happens its natural because there is no higher order. Aliens should make an documentary about it.
Yes, and that sucks bc we'll never have the right to experience this 
No. We decent from harem forming monkeys. The invention of enforced monogamy is probably the greatest cultural achievement in human history.
monogomomus ??? you sounds a lil bit sus there mister whooper jr
No we aren't. humans are moderately polygynous species. 80% of all women have reproduced, whilst only 40% of men have. Monogamy was a socially enforced norm to encourage lower tier men to be more productive and ensure social stability at least somewhat. Regardless of that, in theoretically monogamous societies too high status men still tried to fuck many women (have lovers).
Ü
Why do you think it was socially enforced collectively in all societies? Because of some conspiracy?
Not in all societies, polygynous societies also exist, as I pointed out, and it was an organic process rather than some Hobbsian "Social Contract". Monogamous societies apparently proved to be more effective. This was only enforced because most men found this sensible, or perhaps really it happened that in lots of societies the most rational and the most moral (historical context accounted for) had the final say. As monogamy eroded (and ofc this, too, was no "Feminist-ZOG" conspiracy but simply a direct result of Sexual revolution/sexual liberation), people could start reverting back to polygyny.
Last edited:
I think we're not. But monogamy is way better
Men and women pair bond for a while and until you both make decisive efforts to keep the bond tight it will probably break eventually
Considering the amount of divorces and the women who are initiating them, we can assume that women can't love men. If they could they wouldn't be getting divorces
Considering the amount of divorces and the women who are initiating them, we can assume that women can't love men. If they could they wouldn't be getting divorces
Natural selection plus sexual selection. Even Darwin couldn't find conclusive answers as to how these 2 relate. He reportedly called the latter the "second agency" other than the natural selection. There are cases when sexual selection actually runs counter to the natural selection: this is a hypothesis. Some species like Irish elk have been theorized to have died out due to maladaptive sexual selection.
Marriage is a social construct it has nothing to do with genetics.
Then I am living the wrong way, because my balls are too big to have room for a taint.
only cucks come up with conclusions such as not being genetically wired for monogamy.
no its not natural
but its the most successful societal type
how many poly societies have survived?? probably 0
in the past when monogamous society/nations fought polygamous ones, monogamous ones were victorious.
cause as you would know chad has halo effect, even in the past. so most of them were rather incompetent and without the help of other males chad will not survive.
famous example is druids and romans, initially romans had monogamy and brutally destroyed the chad druids. eradicated most of them, bred their toilets as concubines.
your 6'0 chad druid walked into battlefield smothered with cumsluts squirt vs a 5'7 roman manlet who had tech, advance weapons and good tactics
when you force polygamy on the society like our current world, then males punch out. its why army has had time recruiting for majority of countries. no male is willing to throw his life away just so foids and chad can continue to have orgies
that's why governments now are trying to stop the woke, so they can bring monogamy back as it will help bring back good birth rates.
but its the most successful societal type
how many poly societies have survived?? probably 0
in the past when monogamous society/nations fought polygamous ones, monogamous ones were victorious.
cause as you would know chad has halo effect, even in the past. so most of them were rather incompetent and without the help of other males chad will not survive.
famous example is druids and romans, initially romans had monogamy and brutally destroyed the chad druids. eradicated most of them, bred their toilets as concubines.
your 6'0 chad druid walked into battlefield smothered with cumsluts squirt vs a 5'7 roman manlet who had tech, advance weapons and good tactics
when you force polygamy on the society like our current world, then males punch out. its why army has had time recruiting for majority of countries. no male is willing to throw his life away just so foids and chad can continue to have orgies
that's why governments now are trying to stop the woke, so they can bring monogamy back as it will help bring back good birth rates.
Last edited:
I don't think so
The problem with inceldom lies not in getting no sex. In the old days, the best genes were still being selected for, but the incels were sent to wars, to lay there lives down and be able to die a noble death. But today, since everything is safer, the incels created by the rng of breeding aren’t being killed off, instead being made to live long, miserable lives. Monogamy is used as a tool to sustain the population, as more incels breed this way, meaning less disenfranchisement. So yes, we may have been built for polygamy, but we are also built to die at 35
Similar threads
Toxic Femininity
I don’t get why age gaps are so controversial
- Grey Man
- Inceldom Discussion
Stupid Clown
Users who are viewing this thread
