![copecel2](/data/avatars/m/5/5604.jpg?1523677400)
copecel2
Banned
-
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2018
- Posts
- 1,009
I was thinking to share some of the nudes with my fellow incels, soooo
Chadfishing is good because you can get revenge sometimesI see Chad wants to share the nudes of his foid orbiters
Chadfishing is good because you can get revenge sometimes
Thisprobably would get banned for foid worship
And which law is that?Nudes acquired under false pretenses? Also against the rules, probably. It treads into that "illegal" territory. And illegal things aren't allowed here.
Luckenbaugh’s lawyer, Jacksonville attorney Matt Silva asked Cameron to dismiss the case when court reconvened Thursday afternoon on the basis the state failed to prove two elements beyond a reasonable doubt that Luckenbaugh acted with intent to humiliate or demean Laughinghouse by sending pictures to Anderson using SnapChat and that Laughinghouse’s expectation of privacy was not reasonable after sending personal images of himself to a stranger online.
Pictures or it didn't happen!
Almost certainly not allowed.
No.So the law exists,
You didn't give an example of such a law. "Revenge porn" laws are something different.Nudes acquired under false pretenses?
It is not "illegal" depending on where you live and how you publish it.Also against the rules, probably. It treads into that "illegal" territory. And illegal things aren't allowed here.
Upload to an external site then link it here.Furthermore, this is between two human parties, you post nudes on Incels.co, or any website, it becomes an issue with the website. Hosts decide to cut ties because the website itself is problematic for allowing this.
Offense. – A person is guilty of disclosure of private images if all of the following apply:
(1) The person knowingly discloses an image of another person with the intent to do either of the following:
a. Coerce, harass, intimidate, demean, humiliate, or cause financial loss to the depicted person.
b. Cause others to coerce, harass, intimidate, demean, humiliate, or cause financial loss to the depicted person.
(2) The depicted person is identifiable from the disclosed image itself or information offered in connection with the image.
(3) The depicted person's intimate parts are exposed or the depicted person is engaged in sexual conduct in the disclosed image.
(4) The person discloses the image without the affirmative consent of the depicted person.
(5) The person discloses the image under circumstances such that the person knew or should have known that the depicted person had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
A person commits the offense of unlawful distribution of sexual images or recordings if, being eighteen (18) years of age or older, with the purpose to harass, frighten, intimidate, threaten, or abuse another person, the actor distributes an image, picture, video, or voice or audio recording of the other person to a third person by any means if the image, picture, video, or voice or audio recording:
(1) Is of a sexual nature or depicts the other person in a state of nudity; and
(2) The other person is a family or household member of the actor or another person with whom the actor is in a current or former dating relationship.
You didn't give an example of such a law. "Revenge porn" laws are something different.
It is not "illegal" depending on where you live and how you publish it.
Upload to an external site then link it here.
Several other states have similar laws to North Carolina.![]()
States With Revenge Porn Laws
States With Revenge Porn Laws: IT'S NOT ACTUALLY ABOUT REVENGE, OR ABOUT PORN. It’s about consent and privacy.www.cagoldberglaw.com
Arkansas requires a "dating relationship"
Most users don't live in the United States. You go find all the places where it's illegal.