G
Guest2
Guest
@Napoleon de Geso
I think judging people on their looks is unfair, and ugly females should be subjected to the same treatment as attractive ones.
However, one could argue that ugly females do not have the only value a female can have (hole/looks), and so are inherently worthless compared to an attractive one.
On the other hand, neither ugly nor attractive females are going to give us sex, so they are the same value. Why would I respect a superior flame grilled steak packet of crisps more than an inferior roast chicken one, if I can't eat either?
I think judging people on their looks is unfair, and ugly females should be subjected to the same treatment as attractive ones.
However, one could argue that ugly females do not have the only value a female can have (hole/looks), and so are inherently worthless compared to an attractive one.
On the other hand, neither ugly nor attractive females are going to give us sex, so they are the same value. Why would I respect a superior flame grilled steak packet of crisps more than an inferior roast chicken one, if I can't eat either?
Last edited by a moderator: