It sure feels like it with how much hate I've seen them throw at each other recently, not counting all the other stuff we already know about. It really feels like it would be better to just replace them.
Discussion Are the majority of men and women natural enemies?
Foids faux jealous on men thinking they have all the privileges while most of the world revolves around them since the beginning of time.
Guys are mad at foids from trying to get even more power than they already have over men.
The reason the fighting is going on now is because of feminism.
Guys are mad at foids from trying to get even more power than they already have over men.
The reason the fighting is going on now is because of feminism.
D
Yes, fuck women.
Nah, femoid only see incels as enemys.
They see normies as ATMs at best.
We really need to replace foids with waifubots. They can have chadbots... I don't care. As long as we don't need foids anymore.
I personally believe that men and women have conflicting interests, so yes.
Women are the enemies of men, but men aren't the enemies of women. The moment men show actual hostility females capitulate. They only behave in a hostile manner when they have some kind of shield, whether that be another man or the law.
Yes. Look up battle of the sexes. Both genders have been manipulating each other since the dawn of man.
foids = shit
We wish.
Distance between Milky- Way and Andromeda galaxy in mm level IQ
Yes they are enemies. Males and females stay together only when they have to breed. Forcing them in the same room for long will push them to kill each other. Also thanks to loser feminism the females believe they can get mad at males anytime they want, then they wonder why they get beaten up.
My fantasy is alien women invade and bring us to their cultured planet or just stay on earth dating incels and average men who can't get dates.
It is not natural, it's the product of feminism.
What if feminism is an expression of the natural conflict in interests between the sexes?
Yes
I believe so. What's good for men is bad for women, and vice versa. There is not a single example of any society, historical or modern, in which there was true gender equality and men and women were both happy, because true equality is impossible. There will either be patriarchy/men happy (the West before the 1960s) or gynocracy/women happy (the West after the 1960s). You can only give more rights to women by taking rights away from men (and vice versa). When women gained the right to no-fault divorce their husbands, men lost the right not to be divorce raped. When women gained the right to vote, the value of a man's vote was cut in half. When women gained the right to enter the workforce, the glut of labor drove wages down for male workers. When women gained the right to #metoo a guy, men lost the right to due process. Same thing with the other direction, for example, when patriarchy gave men the right to a loyal looksmatched wife, women lost the freedom to slut around with every chad they could find. Men's interests and women's interests have always been in conflict with one another.
Bluepillers who say "i sUppOrT tRuE eQuaLiTy" and think a perfect world with no feminism and no patriarchy can be achieved are hopelessly ignorant and naïve. The fact that it's never once happened in the thousands of years and hundreds of different civilizations of human history should be a clue.
Bluepillers who say "i sUppOrT tRuE eQuaLiTy" and think a perfect world with no feminism and no patriarchy can be achieved are hopelessly ignorant and naïve. The fact that it's never once happened in the thousands of years and hundreds of different civilizations of human history should be a clue.
It is natural and it's existed since the beginning of time, but was suppressed under patriarchy. Feminism didn't create an artificial conflict between men and women, it merely brought the natural conflict between the sexes to the surface.
The idea that men and women were natural buddy-buddies before feminism came along is a redpilled ideology. Blackpillers know better. Women were never our friends.
Oh it's possible alright. It's just that it won't last. Like an inverted pendulum : it's likely an unstable equilibrium.
Mechanical equilibrium - Wikipedia
I bet it can be proven rigorously. I mean both genders have power over the other. Once one side gets the upper hand, it can use it to increase its domination even more, and the state goes even further away from equilibrium.
Females will increase their power until their ineptitude breaks society down.
Last edited:
I'd agree. What I meant was that historically we asserted control over foids to manage the conflict, but now we have given them rights and can no longer control anything.
All of this is why we need to find a way to replace women.
Like dogs and cats
Yes
Yes I'm also for replacing foids. They are lesser beings sexually and mentally stuck in the stone age. They are nothing more than war spoils of war nad they act ad such being a liability and a burden to whatever tribe treats them with respect plaguing them with nagging and low fertility and constant emotional instability.
Human garbage just genetically mutate them or replace them with bots and artificial wombs
More precisely they behave in a hostile manners when men show weakness or kindness (aka weakness for their animal brain) . They are perpetually shit testing
Last edited:
more like low status men and women
Similar threads
Discussion
Women cause so much strictness
- underballer
- Inceldom Discussion
underballer
Users who are viewing this thread
