Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Are skinny, small framed men and large, rugged looking women genetic losers? Agree or Disagree? Please share your opinion.

9

933127

Greycel
Joined
Apr 24, 2025
Posts
3
Ideal male is supposed to be tall, medium to large frame with good muscle mass with defined and rugged facial features.

Ideal female is supposed to be gracefully slender or slim, with sharp angular defined facial features. Female should be shorter than her male partner.

Male and female offspring that inherit ideal phenotypic traits are genetic winners with high SMV. Unfortunately these traits are not gender specific or directly linked to gender. Your genes are a combination from both parents. Due to genetic recombination, the traits that are expressed are a crapshoot.

Which means you can have daughters that have a large frame, large jaw, with strong rugged masculine features like the father. Example: Rumer Willis, daughter of Bruce Willis and Demi Moore.


View: https://www.flickr.com/photos/125766391@N02/54498774257/in/photostream/


Likewise you can have sons with small/skinny frame, soft features inherited from their mother. If there is a huge height discrepancy between father and mother it could negatively impact the son’s potential adult height


View: https://www.flickr.com/photos/125766391@N02/54499638846/in/dateposted/


So if the male and female offspring do not have the ideal phenotypic traits, are they genetic losers? Please share your opinion on this.
 
So if the male and female offspring do not have the ideal phenotypic traits, are they genetic losers? Please share your opinion on this.
Yeah but society is set up so that women have infinite SMV no matter what they fucking do or what they look like.
Dysgenic women don't exist. Men will impregnate anything with a pulse and create more incels through genetic recombination.
Only male offspring can be genetic losers.
 
honestly she looks like a rare failed recombination
1746483024829
 
Face and social skills are more important than frame imo. I've had a very good frame half of my life, other half being lvl1 obese. Didn't help me.
 
Face and social skills are more important than frame imo. I've had a very good frame half of my life, other half being lvl1 obese. Didn't help me.
"X trait didnt get me pussy, so X trait must be completely useless"
:feelstastyman:
 
Yeah but society is set up so that women have infinite SMV no matter what they fucking do or what they look like.
Dysgenic women don't exist. Men will impregnate anything with a pulse and create more incels through genetic recombination.
Only male offspring can be genetic losers.
:yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes:
 
you made it sound otherwise
I'm a bitter failed man and nobody pays me for venting online. I can make mistakes or inaccuracies in my comments. When you're so low like me you can blame basically everything for getting to this extremely low point.
 
The rugged foids while not really attractive to me. They don't usually birth incels and aren't genetically bad perse.
 

Similar threads

Lazyandtalentless
Replies
5
Views
434
Enigmaz
Enigmaz
Shaktiman
Replies
16
Views
3K
glutty
glutty
E
Replies
10
Views
1K
Blacksmith
B

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top