Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Are most blackpilled incels sexual markets socialists?

are-most-blackpilled-incels-sexual-markets-socialists?

  • Yes

    Votes: 3 50.0%
  • No

    Votes: 3 50.0%

  • Total voters
    6
  • Poll closed .
It all fell down

It all fell down

Banned
-
Joined
Aug 9, 2021
Posts
688
Most of them are demanding Governmental intervention on the Sexual Market. Yeah, I stated some time ago that the current sexual market situation has already Governamental intervention like:
-Paying companies to shift foids and that push more unemployment to men(affirmative actions)/
-Affirmative actions on engineerings when is proved that men are better at them.
-Assisted abortion by the Goverment what leads to promiscuity.
-


The point is that most serious proposals from incels implie Governamental intervention too:

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTear/comments/pb7cxu/incel_list_of_some_realistic_demands_they_could/


I have a set of libertarian proposals to the Incel problem:
-Allow of Completely legal prostitution with NO STATE INTERVENTION.
-Ban any foid shift extra bonus for companies.
-Allow only-allowed men schools with only allowed teachers in order to teach them subjects as blackpill, escortcelling fundamentals and things like that.
-Allow 14 yrs or over men to go to escorts(less betabuxxers, less simps paying OnlyFans).

These are the most grounded proposals also. They don't imply more budget and fit perfectly with the "equality speech" of Governments nowadays.
 
Last edited:
nigga learn some grammer
 
I support the redistribution of money from rich white and Jewish families to the poor and make large multinational companies owned by a powerful state that is against degeneracy in all its forms and uses funds to support only men.

However, this doesn't make me a socialist or communist: I have no problem with small-scale capitalism or the concept of private property itself, so no.
 
I support the redistribution of money from rich white and Jewish families to the poor and make large multinational companies owned by a powerful state that is against degeneracy in all its forms and uses funds to support only men.

However, this doesn't make me a socialist or communist: I have no problem with small-scale capitalism or the concept of private property itself, so no.
:feelswhat:
 
Government intervention only favors women.
 
The redistribution of money from rich to poor is not an idea from socialism/communism as that would make any welfare state like the UK, US, and most industrialized nations considered as such.

Saying billionaires should not exist, who mostly use their money to manipulate the government in favor of feminism, LGBTQ, and their self-interests is not an ideology or economic system.
 
To change the upcoming time
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top