Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Are manlets complaining about height just ugly?

J

Jackson14

Banned
-
Joined
May 1, 2018
Posts
279
First and forecast, all things being equal, I agree taller guys have it better than a manlet BUT we see short good looking manlets with hot bitches all the time, they have no trouble getting girls. It's the UGLY ones that struggle getting girls the same way any ugly guy has trouble getting girls. It does not help being a manlet for sure but I believe the blame is being misplaced on height when it's simply ugliness.
 
As a manlet you need a gl face to make up for your short height. So they‘re most likely avarage/ugly lookswise
 
Well, not being good-looking, sure. Average tall guys generally have a CHANCE to get laid whereas average short guys could well end up incel.
 
As a manlet you need a gl face to make up for your short height. So they‘re most likely avarage/ugly lookswise

That's what a I mean though. Every average/ugly person struggles this day in age. That's why I think face >>>> height.

Average looking tall guy might land a bitch but the ugly one has no hope in hell. Conversely a short average looking manlet still has a chance but an ugly one has no hope

I'm not going to argue that it doesnt hurt to be a manlet but face is still more important. Back the original point, short manlet cant get girls because they're ugly in the face, direct correlation.
 
Well I'm short and ugly, so I complain about both things.
 
The shorter you are the more you will have to compensate by having a good face. For example at 5'7 which is not a turbomanlet would need an above average face while a 5'3 guy would need a model face.
 
Well, not being good-looking, sure. Average tall guys generally have a CHANCE to get laid whereas average short guys could well end up incel.

Average looking manlets seem to draw in Landwhales whereas gl manlets still manage prime pussy. Basically the only difference is tall average guy might get an average looking girl instead of a landwhale. Face no matter what still lands primetime pussy.
 
We had a 8/10 face manlet here before @FiveFourManlet
 
I'd trade a few points of my SMV to get that much taller, ngl, and I'm not even that short. Face >>> height only seems legit if you're not short tbh.
 
First and forecast, all things being equal, I agree taller guys have it better than a manlet BUT we see short good looking manlets with hot bitches all the time, they have no trouble getting girls. It's the UGLY ones that struggle getting girls the same way any ugly guy has trouble getting girls. It does not help being a manlet for sure but I believe the blame is being misplaced on height when it's simply ugliness.
Nah complaining about your height as manlet ist totally legit. Nobody can tell me that femoids or other people don't give a shit about a manlets height lol. Femoids prefer taller men no doubt and people in general respect taller men more.
 
The shorter you are the more you will have to compensate by having a good face. For example at 5'7 which is not a turbomanlet would need an above average face while a 5'3 guy would need a model face.
At what point do you consider turbo Manley status to begin?
 
You need a good face to compensate for it and even an average face is not sufficient
 
Yes, unless they are below 5'8
 
Another low IQ thread. At 5'7 even 9/10 face could barely save you, point of dead end.
 
Another low IQ thread. At 5'7 even 9/10 face could barely save you, point of dead end.
kek, I think a 9/10 face 5'7" guy would be a chadlite. That's not even that short
 

Similar threads

VλREN
Replies
13
Views
297
PrototypeCel
PrototypeCel
RealSchizo
Replies
17
Views
439
underballer
U
Zuckuccius
Replies
15
Views
461
ohlev
ohlev

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top