You guys believe that for some things equality of outcome wouldn’t be so bad?
Serious Are “equality of outcome” considerations inherently detestable?
I'm not sure human cuck.
There already is an equality of outcome.
Jfl. Gorilla cucks can’t take a joke.
Yeah I'd love equality of outcome. Everybody making the same amount of money, living a more relaxed and peaceful lifestyle, less competition overall. Would be pretty sweet. Maybe we'd even get stuff automated, some people that don't want to work could sit at home and receive UBI.
Equality of opportunity is flawed, as we have clearly seen, meritocracy doesn't exist in this world. It's all corruption, cronyism, nepotism, theft etc...
Equality of opportunity is flawed, as we have clearly seen, meritocracy doesn't exist in this world. It's all corruption, cronyism, nepotism, theft etc...
P
not if there is an afterlifeThere already is an equality of outcome.
Equality of outcome is not possible if individuals are so different genetically.
Equality of opportunity = genetic elite taking over the planet
Equality of outcome = communism and dictators taking over the planet.
Equality of opportunity = genetic elite taking over the planet
Equality of outcome = communism and dictators taking over the planet.
Brutal. So what’s the best solution?
There is none tbh. Equality of opportunity is better imo, if corruption can be controlled. The west is a good example of this. Living in the US, as bad is it might be, still beats living in Russia or one of the separatist shitholes of the soviet union.
Equality of outcome means robbing whites to pay blacks.
It means giving the A student a C so the F student can also get a C
It’s a totally meme existence. Nobody is entitled to anything. And you can’t fuck with the fabric of natural law to this extreme a degree.
It’s funny how leftists switched from talking about equality to equity. It was subtle but I’m seeing that word mentioned a lot lately. I think they realized equality isn’t enough since there are other immutable factors at play and that a diverse country is not an even playing field. It’s setting up for socialism. Do you want your neurosurgeon to be an “equal outcome” diversity hire? How about the guy that builds the house you plan to live in? Equality of outcome is necessary diversity damage control propaganda.
the solution is more like segregation by the top 1 or 2 most consequential genetic traits. Wow it’s kinda like there’s a reason countries have borders
and I don’t think we should have enforced equality of outcome in the sexual market either. A: it would require the state to meddle with peoples most intimate and private affairs and B: it would never happen because nobody would get behind it, certainly not women. And most men feel like temporarily embarrassed chads so they wouldn’t go for it either. Besides, how would u feel fucking your government issued girlfriend? Sounds depressing.. it won’t be true equality of outcome. You can get the same result by just legalizing prostitution. But anyways, the sexual market needs to be fixed and IMO that means getting rid of the 19th, womens right to work, social media, eugenics platforms, and makeup. If none of those things existed, this site wouldn’t exist either.
there is some minimum amount of discomfort/general shittiness that must exist in the world. A post-discomfort world isn’t possible.
and as for Muh racial equity of blacks. That requires pretty much dismantling all ofwestern civilization and becoming a woke communist/dictatorship just to accommodate them. It’s Easier to just get rid of them. Then we wouldn’t be talking about leveling the playing field. multiculturalism is such a fucking disaster. This fact is obvious to anyone who doesn’t have their head up their ass and is able to look at things objectively. What genius thought it would be a good idea to free the slaves and let them loose in your own country. What moron thought subspecies could coexist? Who thought that blacks would ever forgive whites for slavery?
Besides. Do people really want equality in every way? Do they want equality in any way? I think most people really want to have unfair immutable competitive advantages in an unfair, competitive world. Manlets don’t want height to be inconsequential. They want to be tall. Feminists/ugly bitches don’t want to live in a world where looks don’t matter and where female primal value to be replaced by some merit based, malleable metric of value like career/personality.. instead they want to be hot, desirable, and to fit the archetype of a submissive 1950’s trophy housewife.
It means giving the A student a C so the F student can also get a C
It’s a totally meme existence. Nobody is entitled to anything. And you can’t fuck with the fabric of natural law to this extreme a degree.
It’s funny how leftists switched from talking about equality to equity. It was subtle but I’m seeing that word mentioned a lot lately. I think they realized equality isn’t enough since there are other immutable factors at play and that a diverse country is not an even playing field. It’s setting up for socialism. Do you want your neurosurgeon to be an “equal outcome” diversity hire? How about the guy that builds the house you plan to live in? Equality of outcome is necessary diversity damage control propaganda.
the solution is more like segregation by the top 1 or 2 most consequential genetic traits. Wow it’s kinda like there’s a reason countries have borders
and I don’t think we should have enforced equality of outcome in the sexual market either. A: it would require the state to meddle with peoples most intimate and private affairs and B: it would never happen because nobody would get behind it, certainly not women. And most men feel like temporarily embarrassed chads so they wouldn’t go for it either. Besides, how would u feel fucking your government issued girlfriend? Sounds depressing.. it won’t be true equality of outcome. You can get the same result by just legalizing prostitution. But anyways, the sexual market needs to be fixed and IMO that means getting rid of the 19th, womens right to work, social media, eugenics platforms, and makeup. If none of those things existed, this site wouldn’t exist either.
there is some minimum amount of discomfort/general shittiness that must exist in the world. A post-discomfort world isn’t possible.
and as for Muh racial equity of blacks. That requires pretty much dismantling all ofwestern civilization and becoming a woke communist/dictatorship just to accommodate them. It’s Easier to just get rid of them. Then we wouldn’t be talking about leveling the playing field. multiculturalism is such a fucking disaster. This fact is obvious to anyone who doesn’t have their head up their ass and is able to look at things objectively. What genius thought it would be a good idea to free the slaves and let them loose in your own country. What moron thought subspecies could coexist? Who thought that blacks would ever forgive whites for slavery?
Besides. Do people really want equality in every way? Do they want equality in any way? I think most people really want to have unfair immutable competitive advantages in an unfair, competitive world. Manlets don’t want height to be inconsequential. They want to be tall. Feminists/ugly bitches don’t want to live in a world where looks don’t matter and where female primal value to be replaced by some merit based, malleable metric of value like career/personality.. instead they want to be hot, desirable, and to fit the archetype of a submissive 1950’s trophy housewife.
Last edited:
All human attempts to make things just in that regard only make things more unjust.
For example, why should black get quotas and short men not? And if both should get quotas, what criteria should be used to consider someone black or short? How black is black enough? How short is short enough? Should a black man who descents from a slave owner still get quotas?
It all gets way too complicated and arbitrary and no justice is done.
For example, why should black get quotas and short men not? And if both should get quotas, what criteria should be used to consider someone black or short? How black is black enough? How short is short enough? Should a black man who descents from a slave owner still get quotas?
It all gets way too complicated and arbitrary and no justice is done.
Equality is a glittering generality. Sounds great, which is why it is used often, but its such a silly idea its mind boggling how this many people believe that bullshit.
Yes, I am including equalitea of opportunity.
JFL at the foid in the video trying to bend what he says.
Yes, I am including equalitea of opportunity.
JFL at the foid in the video trying to bend what he says.
Last edited:
Length of the equator in centimeters IQ. Especially agreed on how to get equality in the sexual market. Also, I would say slut shaming should come back too alongside the other things you mentioned.
Last edited:
I agree fully on everything except the subsection on blacks. It’s not right to send them to some random place in Africa, seeing that their bloodlines have been here for longer than most white Americans (assuming you’re not a first Virginian or something). I also think they were well on the way to becoming fully fledged and admirable citizens as a whole, but were somehow compromised during and after the civil rights movement to become vote farming neo-slaves with increased urbanization and the disintegration of the family unit.
I hate you.
Isnt that some feminist buzzword?
Equality of outcome is flawed since there won’t be any entitlement and nobody would care about anything. Two people who put different amount of work into something get the same thing
Sure, but we can give them a state or two. it need not be forced segregation. Freedom of association will suffice. People will self-segregate. but you can’t deny that blacks can’t compete in a merit based system with whites and Asians. Blame their foid’s sexual selection. Nog foids select for aggressiveness/violence/dominance as opposed to intelligence. And male nogs know this hence black culture revolving around guns, violence, drugs, tattoos, conspicuous displays of wealth, etc. All foids of all races select for violence to usually a high degree but when it comes to propagating genes it’s usually the betabuxx siring offspring. That is selection for intelligence.. but that’s not the case with black women who marry the state and don’t need resources from men. Black “communities” is what happens when a moderate amount of money is no longer a sexual currency.. So I think they should compete economically and sexually amongst themselves. Just like how Asians should compete sexually amongst themselves in asian countries Since they stand no chance in the west.
I agree with you for the most part. But not everyone has equal opportunity. Some people just don’t have the means to do things other can. As for the government gf subsection, she could be modified in a way to be subservient. Although it may seem like prostitution it is free and she will genuinely enjoy because of modifications. This is one of the only solutions since foids in their nature are whores
Similar threads
- Fearend_Loathing
- Inceldom Discussion
Fearend_Loathing
blackpillednigga
Users who are viewing this thread
