Diocel
A soup for one, please.
★★★★★
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2019
- Posts
- 52,937
- Online
- 293d 20h 36m
Over for ChristcelsDiocel said:
Would he slay in finland ?FinnCel said:Chaddam
DefinitelyDiocel said:Would he slay in finland ?
But he need to be at least 6ft ?FinnCel said:Definitely
Then he's chaddam liteDiocel said:But he need to be at least 6ft ?
? How do you figure that?WØLF said:AND MOST CHRISTIANS THINK HE'S WHITE
Jews aren't White.WØLF said:AND MOST CHRISTIANS THINK HE'S WHITE
FinnCel said:Chaddam
Cope.DepravedAndDeprived said:Sounds like leftist propaganda.
Yes, I cope and you guys wuz kangz.Diocel said:Cope.
FinnCel said:Chaddam
Yea but that's paintings, they don't actually believe it was some white guy in a desert preaching something do they?WØLF said:
THEY DOSnow Dushman said:Yea but that's paintings, they don't actually believe it was some white guy in a desert preaching something do they?
How does a man who was born from a woman who is originated from the MIDDLE EAST white with blue eyes ?DepravedAndDeprived said:Yes, I cope and you guys wuz kangz.
Not with that eye area and noseFinnCel said:Chaddam
Good harmony thoWØLF said:Not with that eye area and nose
True but that's still cope, he would unironically be posting here if he lived in the West in 2020Diocel said:Good harmony tho
North Africa, Levant, Anatolia etc were possibly lighter skinned before Arab invasion I thinkDiocel said:How does a man who was born from a woman who is originated from the MIDDLE EAST white with blue eyes ?
If manlet it's over.WØLF said:True but that's still cope, he would unironically be posting here if he lived in the West in 2020
He was of average height for His time and place, between 5′ (152 cm) and 5′5ʺ (165 cm). In other words, it's over for him.Diocel said:If manlet it's over.
For north africa it depend on the region, this are the people from the north,Unhappy-Man said:North Africa, Levant, Anatolia etc were possibly lighter skinned before Arab invasion I think
That is why saying Jesus would have to have looked like what today people see as a typical arab nowadays is probably not correct. Although that picture does look abit more semitic to me it still seems like a long shot to predict what Jesus would have looked like.Diocel said:For north africa it depend on the region, this are the people from the north,@Algeriancel is very pale even for white people.
![]()
it does not matter what skin tone he is. What matters is whether he was a chad archetype or not...I'm far more interested in the skin tone of the anti Christ.Unhappy-Man said:That is why saying Jesus would have to have looked like what today people see as a typical arab nowadays is probably not correct. Although that picture does look abit more semitic to me it still seems like a long shot to predict what Jesus would have looked like.
He was definetly not a ChadAdrian Shephard said:He looks like a chad in this one, I saw some other reconstruction when he looked almost neanderthal
Adrian Shephard said:I saw some other reconstruction when he looked almost neanderthal
People will have more to worry about than skin colour when the anti Christ is revealedAlgeriancel said:it does not matter what skin tone he is. What matters is whether he was a chad archetype or not...I'm far more interested in the skin tone of the anti Christ.
Imagine the justification for homicidal racism people of the oppsite skin tone would use if anti Christ was real and was a specific race or skin tone.
I don't. I already know my place in this whole religion thing.Unhappy-Man said:People will have more to worry about than skin colour when the anti Christ is revealed
tbh pretty much every ethnic group ends up drawing/painting Jesus as whatever race they are. I've seen plenty of pictures of Jesus looking like a sub Saharan African as well as Asian despite him being neither one of those. I think its just human nature tbh, that and a lot of artists get used to drawing 1 ethnic group and will just stick to that generally.WØLF said:
jesus was born in jerusalem a place in ME so it's not like it isn't expected but yes the racialisation of a figure such JC is silly when you should be considering his character.WØLF said:AND MOST CHRISTIANS THINK HE'S WHITE LMAO JESUS WAS A SAND NIGGER CONFIRMED
The people who do that only draw him as their race because if they made him white it would be a "dishonor" to their culture (i.e cucked). I think the majority of them see Jesus as white as it's literally the white religion after allIncellectual said:tbh pretty much every ethnic group ends up drawing/painting Jesus as whatever race they are. I've seen plenty of pictures of Jesus looking like a sub Saharan African as well as Asian despite him being neither one of those. I think its just human nature tbh, that and a lot of artists get used to drawing 1 ethnic group and will just stick to that generally.
Literal proof that race matters but normcucks will tell you it's all in your headShin no Shi said:jesus was born in jerusalem a place in ME so it's not like it isn't expected but yes the racialisation of a figure such JC is silly when you should be considering his character.
This depiction of jesus assumes that human populations have remained static over the past two millennia which is disingenuous at best and downright subversive at worst.MegaSpicCel said:Funny how the white man had to morph him into a white chadlite in order for them to accept him as their God
well it only matters to those that are trying to achieve some form of communal space for a religion, as the average person usually would rather denote their own tone to some figure head but realistically speaking, this is what causes the halo effect notion, that those who are of the same similar thread can't cause harm/or are bad, even when a clear display of bad character or abuse is shown.WØLF said:Literal proof that race matters but normcucks will tell you it's all in your head
I meant more in general tbhShin no Shi said:well it only matters to those that are trying to achieve some form of communal space for a religion, as the average person usually would rather denote their own tone to some figure head but realistically speaking, this is what causes the halo effect notion, that those who are of the same similar thread can't cause harm/or are bad, even when a clear display of bad character or abuse is shown.
Not only for christianity but for all other religions. Most people think things just randomly occurred, and have no realisation that a process was done for humans to even be around i.e. evolution.ElliotRodgerHere said:This depiction of jesus assumes that human populations have remained static over the past two millennia which is disingenuous at best and downright subversive at worst.