Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Anyone have a better analogy than this?

C

catfishman23

Banned
-
Joined
Nov 9, 2017
Posts
5,877
I tried to explain to him that women's rating system differs from ours.

I then proceeded to ask him "If you are in the store to buy a chocolate bar, and had two options: first; a very tasty, high quality bar for $2 and secondly; a digusting, low quality bar that was also $2, which one would you choose?"


basically this guy @Limerencel

Thinks comparing a chad and a incel with the same qualities as $2 milky way bars is a very effective analogy for women choosing the type of guys.
 
100% blue pilled, he also objectified males without knowing it
 
I tried to explain to him that women's rating system differs from ours.

I then proceeded to ask him "If you are in the store to buy a chocolate bar, and had two options: first; a very tasty, high quality bar for $2 and secondly; a digusting, low quality bar that was also $2, which one would you choose?"

basically this guy @Limerencel

Thinks comparing a chad and a incel with the same qualities as $2 milky way bars is a very effective analogy for women choosing the type of guys.
High IQ
 
All men want sex and have high libido (naturally), so analogy about equal price is clearly understandable.
 
We are not talking about stacy.
Well, about who? Average femoid? Nothing changes as she applies makeup to become the same 8/10 Stacy. Possible change may occur only at 1/10 or something, where incel is still a reject, but Chad wouldn't fuck her, because he has better options.
 
a better analogy would be

"You get to choose between the cutest puppy in the world, but it never does what it´s told, always shits in the corner and barks at everyone. Or you could choose a trained cockroach that worships you, cooks for you and buys you jewelry. What would you choose?"
 
That’s an analogy that works for us being attracted to women. For them:

“If you are in the store to buy a chocolate bar, and have one average chocolate bar for 2 dollars and another chocolate bar of the same quality just of a darker shade for 2 dollars, which one would you pick?”

Obviously you can see what women choose when it comes to average or below average white guys vs people like me.
 
@catfishman23
Men and women have evolved over millions of years to have two completely different mating strategies.
Women optimize their mating strategy by selecting the absolute highest set of genes that are available to them. This gene-set is carried by Chad, and when women are ovulating (a brief period of time, each month, when women are fertile and sex will lead to pregnancy) they want Chad to nut in her, and no on else! Because her investment in the offspring is big, so they don't want to waste investing in incel-tier offspring. That would be a genetic dead-end, and a waste of time. Therefore, women will compete heavily for Chad, and are even happy to share him, because his quality genes are so rare.
In the hunter-gatherer days, Stacie surrounded herself with plenty of beta-bux orbitors who had no idea who the father of the child was, and these orbitors helped Stacie raise her offspring regardless.

For men, the optimal mating-strategy is "spray and pray". Since the cost of ejaculating into a foid, is next to zero, men have no standards and will fuck anything out there.

Keep in mind, woman are fertile for only a brief period of time, once a month.
This furthers the extreme "reproductive skew" amongst men and women.

The result of all this is that women will hold out for the best genes that are available to them.
Even if that means risking getting catfished by a clown like you.

Hope this helps.
 
Last edited:
@catfishman23
Men and women have evolved over millions of years to have two completely different mating strategies.
Women optimize their mating strategy by selecting the absolute highest set of genes that are available to them. This gene-set is carried by Chad, and when women are ovulating (a brief period of time, each month, when women are fertile and sex will lead to pregnancy) they want Chad to nut in her, and no on else! Because her investment in the offspring is big, so they don't want to waste investing in incel-tier offspring. That would be a genetic dead-end, and a waste of time. Therefore, women will compete heavily for Chad, and are even happy to share him, because his quality genes are so rare.
In the hunter-gatherer days, Stacie surrounded herself with plenty of beta-bux orbitors who had no idea who the father of the child was, and these orbitors helped Stacie raise her offspring regardless.

For men, the optimal mating-strategy is "spray and pray". Since the cost of ejaculating into a foid, is next to zero, men have no standards and will fuck anything out there.

Keep in mind, woman are fertile for only a brief period of time, once a month.
This furthers the extreme "reproductive skew" amongst men and women.

The result of all this is that women will hold out for the best genes that are available to them.
Even if that means risking getting catfished by a clown like you.

Hope this helps.
The thing is like i said that was a bluepilled statement, you are comparing 2 chocolate bars with the exact same prices with 2 different taste, thats skewd for chad if chad has the same qualities as an incel.
 
The thing is like i said that was a bluepilled statement, you are comparing 2 chocolate bars with the exact same prices with 2 different taste, thats skewd for chad if chad has the same qualities as an incel.
Even if we take into account that Chad has a shit personality, treats women like objects, never sticks around to help raise his offspring and cheats on Stacy with other women.. then still, it is in Stacie's evolutionary best interest to put up with his, just to have a chance at securing his genes for her offspring.

Now, todays society is no longer the hunter-gathered days, as it was for hundreds of thousands of years. But the last 2000 years with enforced monogamy, were an anomaly and only a brief moment of time in the grand scheme of things. So our limbic brain (which controls our mating strategy, emotions, love/sex drive etc) is unchanged, and wants the same things it wanted in the hunter-gatherer days.
 
Last edited:
Even if we take into account that Chad has a shit personality, treats women like objects, never sticks around to help raise his offspring and cheats on Stacy with other women.. then still, it is in Stacie's evolutionary best interest to put up with his, just to have a chance at securing his genes for her offspring.
Yes and the thing im trying to say this not many men know this, we think oh if we work on ourselfs and put ourselves out there that is the only way to impress a girl.
Ive done it for 14 years.

Btw im not talking about a stacy.
 
Stop thinking about "looksmatch" and start thinking about "SMV-match"
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top