What private mercenaries? And it's because of statism, or cuckism as I call it, that corporations in the 1% have 95% of the money.But you like private mercenaries and sucking corporate dick, I suppose?
What's the difference?
Free @AncapFAG
The thing is, since I was Fascist / NatSoc for a while, I’ve decided to also incorporate elements of that into my libertarian worldview. It’s just that NatSocs can be arrogant dickheads sometimes when it comes to consistency and what the movement wants in terms of obtaining success and what strategies are right (like the optics debate). I’m finished with that clusterfuck and want something that’s at least consistent and supported by a large majority of Americans but what will still achieve what we want (ie ethnostates, whatever that may be).
Libertarians want a small nightwatcher state, Anarcho-capitaists none at all (cope the state will defacto be repalced by gigacorps and corporate rule)
). Just going away and doing your own competing business works only in fantasy. Market devision, necessary initial financial investment, education, patent ownership, knowing the right people, market saturation. Purely mathematical a later market entrance aone cripples almost any chance.Left libertarianism / anarchism.
Left libertarianism / Anarchism, as I said. It's not perfect, but ideologically consistent.
In the 19th century there was also no internet or fast cars. Things change, and archaic statism where men are held at gun point to pay taxes to single mom whores is an old outdated system for the times we're living in now. Today "Those who own the means of production" have more wealth and resources than ever, way more imbalanced compared to the wealth of average people than it was in the 19th century.
Ye exactly, but why do you want libertarianism / anarchocapitalism then?
That will not change any of your points.
So I don't have to pay taxes or follow bullshit laws that don't harm anyone.Ye exactly, but why do you want libertarianism / anarchocapitalism then?
Economically I am socialist. Culturally liberal, but only men of culture deserve freedom, for masses best thing is iron hand of comrade fuhrer
Instead of taxes you probably would have to deal with corporations engaging in price gouging and withholding your labor's true value due to market power (even more than now). I don't think this is any better. Every service will be replaced by corporations subject to the will of quasi dictators. Some things will always needed to be paid for. Question is who decides.
It's regulations that make the monopolies, because in order to be compliant you have to be rich and jump through lots of obstacles, so it makes it easier for the top 1% to take everything, like they are today. What you fear is already happening under this cucked status system.
Then get rid of them if they don't matter.
Yeah I profited so much from this cucked system. With my inceldom and no-paying job.Someone has to pay for the upbringing of the next generation and as you profited from the last one yourself...
Except there were basically no regulations in the 19th century as well.
Oh they matter the only aternative is ending all human contact. With right libertarianism taxes simply become invisible, but they are still there and even more out of your reach.
I am talking about an anarchist system, where you will be able to reap all benefits of all of your labor with cooperative workspaces instea dof privae oners, not our current one.
Currently everything sucks for sure.
How are they going to "impose their will." In a libertarian system there won't be any market restrictions and hiring policies, but companies still won't be able to get away with polluting or harming the community to make their product or run their business. The only law that libertarians follow is the non-aggression principle.
None of those lords or counsels represent me. And there's still no proof the big bad corporations will enslave humanity if the government bs is taken away with.
Communism and government regulating cucks are never the answer.
I rather take an "invisible tax" than a forced at gun point tax. There's something very low t and cucked about being forced to give your money to single whore moms who never gave you sex, even though they are below your looksmatch.
You're an anarchist? That's not much different from libertarian. You should be against government intervention and try to limit it then.I am talking about an anarchist system, where you will be able to reap all benefits of all of your labor with cooperative workspaces instea dof privae oners, not our current one.
I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery anyday. with freedom we're all given a chance.
That's cope. YOU WILL ALWAYS BE THE SLAVE. Only one person can be dictator and it is never you.
Hell no. if my enemies engaged me it would be a fight to the death. I am aware i am thee only one responsible for my safety.
This idealist make believe system can't work. There will always be corporations (people) getting out of line just like now. Doesn't matter if it is non agression principle or current laws.
With lords I mean company bosses or shareholders. The proof is literally in the reason for anarchy, humans are corruptable and the more power they have the more they are able to leverage it. Can't see how company owners are excluded from this.
But corporate regulated is? It is the same with no taxes, and anomy. Deregulation simply doesn't exist. The only thing you can do is minimizing hierarchies.
Try stealing or paying less and you got your gunpoint.
It's the same and will even be enforced by the same bootlickers. Just comes just after payout not before.Used to be one, but I realized anarchism will never be reached without transitionary socialism thanks to conspirative corporations, but that's the goal yeah. Socialists want anarchism. (anarchism, communism, libertarianism, libertarian socialism, anarchocommunism used to mean the same before the owning class funded countermovements to appropriate the terminology.)
I'm about to drive somewhere, so I have to reply to this later. Peace.Your idealist make believe system can't work. There will always be corporations (people) getting out of line just like now. Doesn't matter if it is non agression principle or current laws.
Through pure leverage of their more potent position in the hierarchy, money is power, owning the means, owning the ressources, owning intellectual property.
See there are laws (the principle), who enforces and decides about them (in this point it is already set)?
Even anarchists agree that the system will have to be defended at some point and that this will only be possible through a flat hierarchies (guess what where does the word anarchy come from). Private security is diametriclaly opposed to the security of being able to do this. Anarcho capitalism is an etymological oxymoron. Capitalism is pure hierarchy.
Some things need to be decided collectively JFL. Even here we can't decide on this non agression principle. (kekekek see what I did there)
Besides that negative freedoms are are a thing.
With lords I mean company bosses or shareholders. The proof is literally in the reason for anarchy, humans are corruptable and the more power they have the more they are able to leverage it. Can't see how company owners are excluded from this.
But corporate regulated is? It is the same with no taxes, and anomy. Deregulation simply doesn't exist. The only thing you can do is minimizing hierarchies.
Try stealing or paying less and you got your gunpoint.
Used to be one, but I realized anarchism will never be reached without transitionary socialism thanks to conspirative corporations, but that's the goal yeah. Socialists want anarchism. (anarchism, communism, libertarianism, libertarian socialism, anarchocommunism used to mean the same before the owning class funded countermovements to appropriate the terminology.)
It's a gamble, but the alternative is doing nothing.
Also jfl the libertarian to fascist pipeline is too real.
Same brother.
Check out the una bombers manifesto you will learn alot. We're at a crossroads as a species, we can either go back to the ancient primitive ways of living under freedom, or we can sit back and embrace the industrial-technological system, as in engulfs every last bit of our freedom and humanity.
High iq. Governments are disruptive to humanity. We don't need tons of money to be happy, most likely we'll be way better off than we are now and with a lot more freedom.
Ok.
