.
Any good sources on good, actually well thought out counter arguments against feminist sociology / theory?
Just look up the faces of feminist authors online theory.
you can counter them easily with logical points but this is how it ends with them using these insults
Otto Weininger
They arent gonna read shit since they are so convinced the are the most correct and righteous people in the whole world
This. As if foids or they’re white knights are ever going to consider a single world coming out of, YOU.
Generally you have to make them yourself cause academia was cucked and never fought back. But a lot of their stuff is just the usual deconstructivist theoretical bullshit. Most of feminist arguments just like tranny shit etc are built upon denying the biological framework of humanity. If you add in the factor of philosophic sensibility that exists in humans feminism gets even more abhorrent. No wonder it really started to thrive alongside everything that's evil like homo rights and other shit. For earlier versions of it, it stinks of illegitimate, entitled claims. In the UK which is the most used example, a bunch of rich women screeching to get the vote for nothing while most men only got it by dying by the millions in the trenches. But they have to gal to claim, at the center of every feminist rhetoric, that men are inherently oppressive and had it so good while poor women suffered. This hate movement should be outlawed. It makes me sick.
The only basis for feminism is female hubris. There's no moral, philosophical or even utilitarian basis. If liberty for women was a good thing, they wouldn't use it only to let evil thrive. Abortions, man hate, hypergamy, divorces, bad education... every day women's actions prove that our ancestors were right. It renders their guilt tripping completely nul when it comes to me.
The only basis for feminism is female hubris. There's no moral, philosophical or even utilitarian basis. If liberty for women was a good thing, they wouldn't use it only to let evil thrive. Abortions, man hate, hypergamy, divorces, bad education... every day women's actions prove that our ancestors were right. It renders their guilt tripping completely nul when it comes to me.
Last edited:
FEMCELS DON'T EXIST, WOMEN AREN'T OPPRESSED BY ANY MEANS ON A GYNOCENTRISTIC SOCIETY.
checkmate
Based post. What are some common feminist sociological positions you disagree with?
the right for abortion is simply undefendable in the modern framework of human rights and is only granted to foids because most people are stupid to fall for femtards' flawed logic
Well what is there to agree with, what are their grand concepts ? "Objectification"
"Toxic masculinity" "Gender roles" "Social construct" "Hegemonic masculinity" might have interested people in the 60's or 70's and could even seem smart but in the light of our times it all falls apart at the seams because women do behave like the slutty, evil and manipulative Liliths patriarchy accused them of being now that they don't have to pretend.Recently i checked what they were saying about early masochism (Venus in Furs/Sacher-Masoch) and it's just always doomed to be so weak conceptually due to the obvious anti male bias, trying to find the hand of patriarchy behind everything at all cost.
The only strength of feminism and why it got so successful is just due to dechristianisation and loss of intellectual virility in white folk, especially men of course. It got successful just like the civil rights movement in general got successful, but substantially there's really not much to it contrary to what they say. No groundbreaking concept or grand event that proved everyone wrong.
How many men do you see who abide by this theory heavily?Well what is there to agree with, what are their grand concepts ? "Objectification"
Recently i checked what they were saying about early masochism (Venus in Furs/Sacher-Masoch) and it's just always doomed to be so weak conceptually due to the obvious anti male bias, trying to find the hand of patriarchy behind everything at all cost.
They seem to think the way men and women act is purely social constructs, not rooted in biological incentive. Hell, feminists even think men liking shapley, curvey women and not butch lesbos is a social construct. They seem to believe that you can reprogram people to not abide by what they deem are "archiac" ideas (which is sex differences)
Its why its funny how leftist retards both at the same time try to shill feminism and anti whiteness, when its non whites who are still very patriarchal in nature. How they think allowing infinite jeets into the west is compatible with feminism
Well now it's all cooked, it all became the norm and men dont even entertain the possibility of a different world. Yesterday i saw like 10 white couples and 9 times out of 10 it was the guy pushing the stroller, it's weird as fuck.
IVe seen radical male feminists on reddit (likely from academia) on subs like it and such. They are even more radical then women when it comes to destroying the "patriarchy" and even call women who disagree with them "pick mes"Well now it's all cooked, it all became the norm and men dont even entertain the possibility of a different world. Yesterday i saw like 10 white couples and 9 times out of 10 it was the guy pushing the stroller, it's weird as fuck.
Yeah it's just dumb. Now also due to it men have to dance like puppets at the sound of millions conflicting messages etc. It's just so dumb. And so fucking toxic. That's why i dont want to hear anyone talk about "toxic masculinity", this shit angers me to no end.
Yeah there's a lot of them. That's why to me it's more of a masculine principle vs feminine principle thing rather than men vs women. Of course foids lead the charge but there's no shortage of slaves to do their bidding tbh
Quoting myself but it makes me think of something. Recently i read a book, a collection of short frisian-dutch folktales, each one told by an individual person from that time (60's - early 70's), interviewed by the book author, mostly in a rural or small town setting. Some of the stories inadvertently put light on the social realities of that era and one clearly showed how men from that time made fun of themselves about being secretly ruled by their wives kek, despite keeping an external appearance of control. So much for muh oppressive patriarchy.Well now it's all cooked, it all became the norm and men dont even entertain the possibility of a different world. Yesterday i saw like 10 white couples and 9 times out of 10 it was the guy pushing the stroller, it's weird as fuck.
Men always loved women. The way they paint our forefathers, as those wife beating alcoholics and all is scandalous. And yet i'm sure the guys from that time wouldn't be pushing the fucking stroller every single time, maintaining that beautiful "head of the household" decorum, but it didn't mean they were tyrannical with their wives. What we see today is complete female dominance and inversion, gender relations in the past were much more gracious.At the same time, some stories do show references to Eve (but in a lighthearted way), or to women being somewhat dense sometimes, but guess what, men are sometimes depicted as such too, and there are stories of very capable women that sometimes even save the male hero. So it's funny to me how feminists think that "le strong female character" is a creation of their own when it's not and clearly existed under patriarchy. In the modern times what do we have ? Everyone knows by now the archetype of the fool husband, etc, but it's not counteracted by anything, might as well say that stupidity is male. The more i observe things the more it seems that our supposedly progressive era is in fact regressive and that the "evil past" was actually more gracious in relation to those things.
Which is fascinating considering that it stemmed from enforcing shit on women and societal perceptions. Tbh i don't want to be evil to foids even if i might seem harsh sometimes but it really seems to me that men have to kinda rule over them to make things fall into order.
Last edited:
Fuck even the original Frozen, written under MUH PATRIARCHY, has a girl saving a boy if i remember correctly. The modern adaptation ditched this. You'd think that they'd like the idea cause in a feminist mind it might have empowering-subversive undertones and they sometimes do this in kids shows now as a form of subversion against the traditional male knight slaying the dragon and all. But sometimes it's like they don't even want to humanize boys enough to be saved by the girl like in those old tales.
Best counter argument is a knife in their throats
the state of western society
we are literally heading towards extinction (although it probably won't come to that)
young generations are going to have really shitty lives (unless immigration increases)
we are literally heading towards extinction (although it probably won't come to that)
young generations are going to have really shitty lives (unless immigration increases)
true, you can't reason with normies, much less foids
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
