View: https://youtu.be/LPu3X9kQP2U
I wish I had a “good pERsonality” like these convicted felons and inmates
Brutal AnothER female prison guard caught having sex with male prisonER
View: https://youtu.be/LPu3X9kQP2U
I wish I had a “good pERsonality” like these convicted felons and inmates
That's why they chose this profession
If what foids and soys said was correct all the prisons should be filled with incels
Ugly men that are atleast 6’0 tall got two ways to choose:
Either, get a carreer, house, car and earn money. Be social. Be funny. Get a woman that wants your money. Get barely any s*x while she cheats on you. Take care of her kids.
Or: get money. Do plastic surgeries. Get a face tattoo. Do drugs. Be a criminal. Get in prison. Get letters and s*x from stacies and make children with them. Come out as a proud alpha male father.
Woman nature in a nutshell.
Either, get a carreer, house, car and earn money. Be social. Be funny. Get a woman that wants your money. Get barely any s*x while she cheats on you. Take care of her kids.
Or: get money. Do plastic surgeries. Get a face tattoo. Do drugs. Be a criminal. Get in prison. Get letters and s*x from stacies and make children with them. Come out as a proud alpha male father.
Woman nature in a nutshell.
She's White and he's Black.
Another coincidence.
Another coincidence.
My fucking country. Niggers invade, do crimes, actually get arrested for once and when their in prison still gets to fuck a whore. Kms
ModERn women (especially westERn) are exactly what’s wrong with modERn society (particularly westERn society).
Because most modERn westERn societies are socio-economically structured in accordance to the cancERous political ideology of feminism (thanks to the Jews) which provided women with economic libERation and financial freedom (by granting them the right to work and own propERty), women are now no longER dependant on men for acquiring the money/resources necessary for survival.
The socio-economic implementation of Feminism (by granting women the opportunity to be financially and matERially “independant”), created an environment in which the “avERage man” (in tERms of level of financial net worth/matERial equity) is NO longER able to use his money/resources as levERage to attract women, enabling women to freely and with “peace of mind” (due to them knowing that they have the capability to do so without facing significant negative consequences), base their sexual selection of men PRIMARILY in accordance to LOOKS
It would be INCORRECT to say that women DON’T CARE about men’s pERsonality AT ALL (in tERms of it influencing their level sexual attraction to men), because they indeed care about men’s pERsonalities BUT ONLY if the men have FIRST met the requirement of having a cERtain “level” of LOOKS.
“pERsonality” is a SECONDARY critERia which influences women’s level of sexual attraction to men, ONLY AFTER a cERtain “looks threshold” has FIRST been met by men in tERms of their level of physical attractiveness (to the avERage woman)
So no mattER how great of a pERsonality a man has, his pERsonality is worthless to women if he is deemed “physically UNattractive” to begin with, as his pERsonality won’t be taken into considERation in the first place.
Whereas, when a man is deemed physically “attractive”, although women DO INDEED take his pERsonality into considERation (when detERmining whethER or not to pursue him for sex), not only is the “weight” of the “influence” that the attribute of “pERsonality” has in detERmining women’s level of “sexual attraction” to men MINIMAL: 20% or less (in proportion to “looks” which carries MAJORITY “weight”: 80% or more, in tERms of its corresponding level of “influence”), the pERsonality traits that women MOSTLY prefER in men (traits they MOSTLY find attractive) are traits which DO NOT lead to a CIVIL society of peace, ordER, safety and security OF THE SPECIES in the long-tERm (women are PRIMARILY attracted to dark-triad traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy, which typically manifest in criminal behaviour predominantly in the “FORM” of significantly highER than avERage levels of BOTH “aggression” AND “tendency” to resort to the ILLEGAL use of “violence”).
Assuming 2 dudes have equal (or approximately vERy similiar) level of “looks”, MOST women (assuming ALL othER “important” attributes of the men in question, MAINLY “money”, are ALSO equal or of a vERy similiar level), will MOST OF THE TIME “CHOOSE” the one who is MORE aggressive and violent (and in EXCEPTIONAL CASES will choose a violent and aggressive man who is “physically UNattractive” OVER a soft, weak, timid “physically attractive” man EVEN WHEN the “diffERence” in level of looks between the 2 men in question, is “significant”).
Consequently, in the LONG tERm, MOST men will MOST LIKELY (“subconsciously,” and EVEN “consciously,” as will be the case for some men), start to “gradually” become MORE and MORE aggressive/violent in ordER to have highER probability of being deemed attractive to women (in the pERsonality department) so that the men have highER probability of acquiring sex/reproduction (consensually lol), because those are the traits (in men) which women REWARD (by providing men who possess those traits, with “sex/reproduction”, which is our MOST SIGNIFICANT “biological impERative” aftER. “Survival”), thERefore INCENTIVISING men to adopt those traits, slowly resulting in a society which becomes progressively more and more chaotic, disordERly, unsafe and insecure to live in, threatening the survival of the human species itself.
Elliot RodgER was right, women don’t desERve human rights because they r closER to being animals than they r to being human, and “human rights” (as can be obviously infERred from the name itself) has always existed FOR HUMANS (NOT for ANIMALS, which is what women r in tERms of their level of consciousness awareness and sentience).
Giving women rights was the greatest mistake in recent human history, women not having the same rights as men for 99.9% of civilized human history isn’t a “co-incidence”, it has always been that way FOR AN IMPORTANT REASON, and even normies are slowly beginning to wake up to realise that reason, but by the time they FULLY become blackpilled, it may be too late.
Gives me great joy, picturing normies in their final moments of life, just as they are breathing their last breaths, dying prematurely as a result of being victims of the chaos, violence and destruction which will arise in the process of the FALL of modERn westERn society, realizing that blackpillERs wERe right all along and thERefore not even having any “peace of mind” in their final moments of existence.
Civilizations have (historically) followed cycles of CREATION and DESTRUCTION. In ordER for a NEW society to be BUILT, the OLD must first be DESTROYED. Such is the “natural ordER”. We r currently in the moments of “calm before the storm”, i hope normies are ready for it when it comes, anyone who is NOT part of the impending and inevitable uprising against the Jewish ovERlords, will be deemed ENEMIES of the coalition (primarily comprised of blackpilled low value males, united in our fight and “struggle” to make this world a bettER place), and they will be shown no mERcy.
Imagine low value males, who have spent their life wagecucking for nothing (because they didn’t even earn enough to “comfortably” satisfy THEIR OWN physical needs for survival, LET ALONE earn enough to be able to attract a woman), PHYSICALLY getting their hands on Normscum (in the brutal revolution which is gradually nearing on the horizon) and unleashing an entire lifetime’s worth of angER and frustration upon those lowlife normscum, I can’t even begin to fathom just how much low value males will make society bleed as retribution for the oppression we’ve faced at its hands since feminism was implemented and it’s corresponding effects arose, on a societal scale.
Good luck Normscum, you’ll need it
Last edited:
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
