Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Animal worship is bluepilled faggotry

Persecuted

Persecuted

Domesticate women and castrate normies
★★
Joined
Jan 28, 2022
Posts
1,194
You have to be dumb and naive to believe that animals are innocent. Animals constantly abandon weaker members of their species and animal females are picky whores like any foids. There is no reason to believe that animals are any better than humans, aside the fact that they're useful to humans and are nice company.

Normies and foids care more about dumb animals than unattractive males. One single case of animal abuse is overblown and gets more attention than thousand cases of lonely male suffering. All this animal worhsip does is that it lets normalfaggot and foids. virtuesignal about how """good""" and """moral""" persons while they're spitting and ridiculing unattractive men. It's fucking manufactured soycial issue, so soyciety can focused on yet another made-up problem instead of adressing real issue, like male oppresion.
 
Last edited:
I deeply hate dogs and dog worshippers
 
Normies are evil.
Dogpill foid husband
 
I hate all animals, they shouldn't be anywhere near humans
 
Brave 2025 02 06 22 58 47
Brave 2025 02 06 22 58 52
Brave 2025 02 06 22 58 57
Brave 2025 02 06 22 59 01


Normies only have empathy for animals and foids (since they are animals too) but never for thinking men of homo sapiens species.
 
They are innocent in the way that they are too dumb to even have a chance at making real moral choices. Some of them still might enjoy torturing other animals for fun and power, they aren't some perfect angels.

There is a real hypocrisy where the suffering of actual human beings is treated as less important and seen as less sympathetic than the suffering of low status men.

And yet, despite that, many animals are in need of our help and are even more powerless to help themselves than we as undesirable men are. We shouldn't give up on our empathy towards these creatures because
a) a connection with an animal can help desperate men to find meaning and companionship with a feeling, conscious being
b) because moral superiority is probably the only kind of superiority we will be able to grasp to build a functional ego with
c) because it's bad optics

C) is especially important in this context. Don't make people chose between the well-being of a dog and the well-being of an ugly man. That's not a smart way to phrase the whole thing. Don't use male suffering as a justification for why you don't want to bother caring for the other creatures you share the world with. It's just one more perfectly calculated act of self-sabotage that can only end badly for us.
 
They are innocent in the way that they are too dumb to even have a chance at making real moral choices. Some of them still might enjoy torturing other animals for fun and power, they aren't some perfect angels.

There is a real hypocrisy where the suffering of actual human beings is treated as less important and seen as less sympathetic than the suffering of low status men.

And yet, despite that, many animals are in need of our help and are even more powerless to help themselves than we as undesirable men are. We shouldn't give up on our empathy towards these creatures because
a) a connection with an animal can help desperate men to find meaning and companionship with a feeling, conscious being
b) because moral superiority is probably the only kind of superiority we will be able to grasp to build a functional ego with
c) because it's bad optics

C) is especially important in this context. Don't make people chose between the well-being of a dog and the well-being of an ugly man. That's not a smart way to phrase the whole thing. Don't use male suffering as a justification for why you don't want to bother caring for the other creatures you share the world with. It's just one more perfectly calculated act of self-sabotage that can only end badly for us.
Nah, soyciety better get their fucking priority straight. Ugly males do all the shitty jobs and pay taxes, so we're entitled to better treatment if not then better they make those animals do said shitty jobs and pay taxes instead. You can love your cat and your dog without participating in propagation of this made up issue that takes away soyciety attention from male suffering.
 
You have to be dumb and naive to believe that animals are innocent. Animals constantly abandon weaker members of their species and animal females are picky whores like any foids. There is no reason to believe that animals are any better than humans, aside the fact that they're useful to humans and are nice company.

Normies and foids care more about dumb animals than unattractive males. One single case of animal abuse is overblown and gets more attention than thousand cases of lonely male suffering. All this animal worhsip does is that it lets normalfaggot and foids. virtuesignal about how """good""" and """moral""" persons while they're spitting and ridiculing unattractive men. It's fucking manufactured soycial issue, so soyciety can focused on yet another made-up problem instead of adressing real issue, like male oppresion.
It depends on the animal
 
If you die and have a dog or cat they will eat your body. Animal worshipers are retarded
 
Nah, soyciety better get their fucking priority straight. Ugly males do all the shitty jobs and pay taxes, so we're entitled to better treatment if not then better they make those animals do said shitty jobs and pay taxes instead. You can love your cat and your dog without participating in propagation of this made up issue that takes away soyciety attention from male suffering.
I have read something along the lines of ~"online right wingers often score quite highly in terms of psychopathic traits" and I'm starting to suspect part of the reason why you guys always lose is because your side has to carry the burden of housing too much innately unlikable political dead-weight
 
I have read something along the lines of ~"online right wingers often score quite highly in terms of psychopathic traits" and I'm starting to suspect part of the reason why you guys always lose is because your side has to carry the burden of housing too much innately unlikable political dead-weight
Whatever if you enjoy being treated like plain trash and being mocked, because we all know how compassionate left-wing faggots are toward incels. JFL at sucking off one side that treats you the same way as the other side - subhuman.
 
Last edited:
Whatever if you enjoy being treated like plain trash and being mocked, because we all know how compassionate left-wing faggots are toward incels. JFL at sucking off one side that treats you the same way as the other side - subhuman.
I can think badly of both left- and right-wingers at the same time. And I didn't suck them off, I criticized your side instead. The left betraying all their values and not giving a shit about low status men / equality on the sexual market is in part such a tragedy because they are the only ones with those specific values. The right does not care for loser males. They are individualists and they won't help us the same way you don't care to help animals. They simply seek some easy excuse for their indifference and keep doing their thing. What we need is a less insane, less brainwashed left, because the right doesn't care about men or whites while those are their primary voting base. Modernity is a battle of collectives first and foremost and any but the most successful of individualists are just a burden to their own side.
 
most people only think animals are "innocent" because they mostly encounter well-fed, tame pets

that is not reality, most animals in nature are quite vicious. They have to be to survive. Many carnivores eat their prey alive. Even herbivores like hippos will fight and kill over territory or for mates

even "nice" housecats will eat mice or birds while they are still alive

Some would say plants are "nicer", but the reality is, even they compete and can kill one another (for example, vines choking out a tree). Only difference, this happens slowly enough that our human senses don't perceive it very well.

I'm not advocating harming them, but we should acknowledge that nature isn't very nice. It's a struggle to survive out there
 
I can think badly of both left- and right-wingers at the same time. And I didn't suck them off, I criticized your side instead. The left betraying all their values and not giving a shit about low status men / equality on the sexual market is in part such a tragedy because they are the only ones with those specific values. The right does not care for loser males. They are individualists and they won't help us the same way you don't care to help animals. They simply seek some easy excuse for their indifference and keep doing their thing. What we need is a less insane, less brainwashed left, because the right doesn't care about men or whites while those are their primary voting base. Modernity is a battle of collectives first and foremost and any but the most successful of individualists are just a burden to their own side.
My side? The incel side? Take your partisan left-wing politics somewhere else, they don't give shit about you.
 
I like cats though, don't care.
 
You have to be dumb and naive to believe that animals are innocent. Animals constantly abandon weaker members of their species and animal females are picky whores like any foids. There is no reason to believe that animals are any better than humans, aside the fact that they're useful to humans and are nice company.

Normies and foids care more about dumb animals than unattractive males. One single case of animal abuse is overblown and gets more attention than thousand cases of lonely male suffering. All this animal worhsip does is that it lets normalfaggot and foids. virtuesignal about how """good""" and """moral""" persons while they're spitting and ridiculing unattractive men. It's fucking manufactured soycial issue, so soyciety can focused on yet another made-up problem instead of adressing real issue, like male oppresion.
I fucking hate dogs and dog people. A dog is basically a retarded wolf with AIDS. I kind of admire cats, but don’t want one as a pet.
 
I like cats though, don't care.
house cats are the incels of animals since there is no catpill and foids won't fuck them. big cats are the chads of animals though.
 
I hate humanity. But nothing pisses me off more than when normies say "dogs are better than some people". Dogs are incapable of feeling love towards humans. Dogs were domesticated to chase away predators from villages and farms. Same with cats except they're less of a threat than mutts.
 
I hate humanity. But nothing pisses me off more than when normies say "dogs are better than some people". Dogs are incapable of feeling love towards humans. Dogs were domesticated to chase away predators from villages and farms. Same with cats except they're less of a threat than mutts.
Normies better fucking train dogs to stop school shooting if they insist they deserve more respect than another human being
 
If you die and have a dog or cat they will eat your body. Animal worshipers are retarded
No you’re in a coffin or cremated. In the former, maggots eat you.
 
Normies see themselves in animals because they act more like animals than animals themselves
 

Similar threads

Chaircel
Replies
8
Views
482
reveries
reveries
packardD
Replies
10
Views
879
FreeCipher
FreeCipher
khhvjihad
Replies
6
Views
199
khhvjihad
khhvjihad
coping_manlet
Replies
74
Views
1K
Emba
Emba

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top