Women - under current circumstances, when they don't need a supportive, stable husband any more and are given the license to be as dirty a whore as humanely and inhumanely possible - have developed into a class of exploiters.
Marx and Engels, as well as Lenin, interpreted "the capitalists" as being exploiters, who are leeching off "the proletarians".
The capitalists own the means of production: factories, mines, mills, banks. Proletarians own virtually nothing. The capitalists hire the proletarians to work as semi-slaves, earning them resources, whilst the proletarians are in no position to demand a better lot, for otherwise they would starve to death. Survival is the biological need nr. 1. A piece of fiction: Emile Zola "Germinal".
In today's Western world, it can hardly be argued "proletarians" are starved victims of the capitalist exploiters, because we have social insurance, welfare, workers earn decent money and own property, too, even though capitalists are still incomparably richer than any plumber or factory worker in the West.
On the other hand, we could argue we post-Sexual Revolution "men" are an exploited class, that the exploiting class: "the woman" is ruthlessly exploiting. Like capitalists had near-total control over means of production, women have near-total control over means of reproduction, that is to say, they decide, which men get sex, how often, in which way and, indeed, for how much money. We men are but beggars, but semi-slaves. We have to suffer periods of (sexual) starvation, as workers of the West had to suffer periods of alimentary starvation.
In the feminist West, many college girls pursue the following strategy: they sleep around with Chads for pleasure, and then they find a wealthy sexually starved middle class man for a "sponsor", a "sugar daddy". The sugar daddy pays 500 to 1000 EUR a month to the woman who is exploiting him, because we men have to have our biological need nr. 2 satisfied. Otherwise we cannot be productive and happy. Simultaneously, said student girls, who get free lunches, free flats &c from the sugar daddy they are leeching off, will continue screwing Chads for her pleasure.
Classical Marxists argued, that in order to remove exploitation of man by man, the means of production must be expropriated. As the great Lenin called this: "The expropriation of the expropriators." This, however, did not work very well in practise, but the idea that something ought to be done about the lot of the toilers, was eventually understood by the smarter members of the capitalist class, such as FDR, social democrats, etc. who introduced measures to ameliorate the situation.
Likewise, Sexual Marxists would argue the exploiters: women - must somehow be deprived of their means to exploit the exploité class - us, men. Thusly, the exploitation of man by woman, will be eradicated.
Some measures, hopefully, will at one point by devised, so as to alleviate the tense situation and suffering of the men.
WORKERS OF THE WORLD, UNITE!
Marx and Engels, as well as Lenin, interpreted "the capitalists" as being exploiters, who are leeching off "the proletarians".
The capitalists own the means of production: factories, mines, mills, banks. Proletarians own virtually nothing. The capitalists hire the proletarians to work as semi-slaves, earning them resources, whilst the proletarians are in no position to demand a better lot, for otherwise they would starve to death. Survival is the biological need nr. 1. A piece of fiction: Emile Zola "Germinal".
In today's Western world, it can hardly be argued "proletarians" are starved victims of the capitalist exploiters, because we have social insurance, welfare, workers earn decent money and own property, too, even though capitalists are still incomparably richer than any plumber or factory worker in the West.
On the other hand, we could argue we post-Sexual Revolution "men" are an exploited class, that the exploiting class: "the woman" is ruthlessly exploiting. Like capitalists had near-total control over means of production, women have near-total control over means of reproduction, that is to say, they decide, which men get sex, how often, in which way and, indeed, for how much money. We men are but beggars, but semi-slaves. We have to suffer periods of (sexual) starvation, as workers of the West had to suffer periods of alimentary starvation.
In the feminist West, many college girls pursue the following strategy: they sleep around with Chads for pleasure, and then they find a wealthy sexually starved middle class man for a "sponsor", a "sugar daddy". The sugar daddy pays 500 to 1000 EUR a month to the woman who is exploiting him, because we men have to have our biological need nr. 2 satisfied. Otherwise we cannot be productive and happy. Simultaneously, said student girls, who get free lunches, free flats &c from the sugar daddy they are leeching off, will continue screwing Chads for her pleasure.
Classical Marxists argued, that in order to remove exploitation of man by man, the means of production must be expropriated. As the great Lenin called this: "The expropriation of the expropriators." This, however, did not work very well in practise, but the idea that something ought to be done about the lot of the toilers, was eventually understood by the smarter members of the capitalist class, such as FDR, social democrats, etc. who introduced measures to ameliorate the situation.
Likewise, Sexual Marxists would argue the exploiters: women - must somehow be deprived of their means to exploit the exploité class - us, men. Thusly, the exploitation of man by woman, will be eradicated.
Some measures, hopefully, will at one point by devised, so as to alleviate the tense situation and suffering of the men.
WORKERS OF THE WORLD, UNITE!
