Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

An argument made against incels

T

thelonewanderer

Banned
-
Joined
Apr 26, 2019
Posts
241
I have seen the argument made that we are just bottom of the barrel genes that shouldn't reproduce anyway. That by us not reproducing the human species is better off. Do you think this is a convincing argument? why or why not
 
Last edited:
I have seen the argument made that we are just bottom of the barrel genes that shouldn't reproduce anyway. That it's a good thing we are unable to find a mate. Do you think this is a convincing argument? why or why not
I have seen the argument that you are piece of shit
 
It isn't because there are plenty of ugly foids too who reproduce and create a new generation of us.If they think we shouldn't reproduce,ugly foids shouldn't either
 
I mean that's the main complaint yes? but over every other species we can recognize our place in the hierarchy and try to change it.
 
It isn't because there are plenty of ugly foids too who reproduce and create a new generation of us.If they think we shouldn't reproduce,ugly foids shouldn't either
Ugly foids definitely shouldn't reproduce but they are the one who actually dump more kids out of their cunts.
 
116526
 
It isn't because there are plenty of ugly foids too who reproduce and create a new generation of us.If they think we shouldn't reproduce,ugly foids shouldn't either

Exactly, you cant argue for this cause if you got subhuman foids below 5ft with no chin bug eyes reproducing.

If subhuman males aren't allowed to reproduce, than neither should his legitimate looksmatch.
 
I have seen the argument made that we are just bottom of the barrel genes that shouldn't reproduce anyway. That by us not reproducing the human species is better off. Do you think this is a convincing argument? why or why not

Doesn't explain the subhuman foids who reproduce
 
not legit argumen
 
yes im sure the guy down the road he drinks and beats his gf regularly and his children to 2 other women is the best genes to spread.

0 iq argument by normies tbh
 
Shitty argument, does not fly. A typical sub 50 IQ IncelTears argument.

1. Your argument violates the concept of equity/fairness. There are many foids (I would say most foids) who are ugly as fuck and still breeding like rats. Take a picture of any of them and pass through "male filter" on some app like FaceApp, you'll see most of them are ugly (or average). So just stopping ugly males from reproducing is not going to change anything. If ugly ass foids can reproduce then we should be able to do as well.

2. Also, having sex does not mean you have to reproduce. Sexual gratification is one of the most basic biological needs of an animal.
 
A lot of us don't even WANT to reproduce to begin with. We just want a loving gf. I very rarely see threads on here or other incel sites, saying how they wish they could have children. Like almost never. I don't want children but even if I did I acknowledge that my genes are defective on many levels and that having children would be a horrible idea.

The idea that getting a girlfriend or getting married automatically means having babies is an antiquated notion that nobody ever brings up anymore unless using it to debunk le evil incels.
 
Yes. Subhumans reproducing just creates more suffering.
 
Incels will always exist as long as ugly foids are allowed to procreate. Since men have lower standards than women, this is why ugly foids can reproduce and women are too low iq to think about the possible remafications of them reproducing. So the argument by the op is completely null and void.
 
Then nobody can expect us to be cucks, work and pay taxes. Do they still think we should pretend to be fine with the people who denies us sex? LMAO.
 
another argument against this is that the beta/ugly males, who should not reproduce according to this argument, are
the ones that are actually advancing society and technology.
Chads use cars,planes,cellphones,medicines that are designed by "supposedly inferior males", and considering the scientific/technologial nature of the system you need beta/ugly males who consacrate their lifes to science and to motivate this kind of men to actually do their job you must assure them an access to sex,relationships and the possibilty to have their own family.
so no,even ignoring the reproduction issue, I still think that inceldom isn't good for humanity in general.
 
I have seen the argument made that we are just bottom of the barrel genes that shouldn't reproduce anyway. That by us not reproducing the human species is better off. Do you think this is a convincing argument? why or why not

My female's looksmatch is now having the time of her life all the attention bouncing from relationship to another and having all the power to herself because ''muh you go girl power'' while i've never experienced any type of intimacy the only reason she's having all of that and more is because she was born a female in this society.
 
That's shit because it assumes people are low quality just because they are ugly, that low quality people don't reproduce already and that incels even want kids, most don't from what I've gathered. There's plenty highiqcels with no physical issues other than being ugly and there are plenty of lowiq thugs out there with a two digit number of bastard children. Even worse if we look at females, low quality females get bombarded with sex solicitations and validation constantly, it goes so far as to have movements who propagate beliefs that every woman is beautiful.
But let's say the argument is true. So we shouldn't reproduce? Ok, time to shut down the site, inceldom ended buddy boyos. It is natural to feel bad about not having a basic need met.
 
No, and I hate when people try to normalize the BIZARRE state of things we're living in (economic socialism, sexual libertarianism BUT with strong government regulations about rape) with that low IQ bullshit.

Women mostly reproduce when they settle down with betabuxxes. Women are taught nowadays that having kids young is dumb, so they just fuck Chads with contraception and/or abortions.

Modern female sexual emancipation is doing no good for the genepool.

I also made a whole video about Darwinian cels.
 
No becuase the ugly females still get to mate, most of us aren't actually that ugly, every female just thinks she deserves Chad
 
It's an argument based on emotions rather than facts.

Facts don't care about your feelings.
 
I have seen the argument made that we are just bottom of the barrel genes that shouldn't reproduce anyway. That by us not reproducing the human species is better off. Do you think this is a convincing argument? why or why not
Even if it were true, there is no reason why we can't live happy and fulfilling lives. We could have sex with contraception, engage in validation and love with other people and have a fair shot in the workforce. As long as we didn't have unprotected sex, our genes would remain here in this generation. However, most incels live in abysmal conditions which is my and many others' primary grievance.

Further, even if most of us were genetic trash there would still be many mentalcels and incels with traumatic experiences but excellent genes.

Fortunately, I doubt that their argument is even very accurate in itself. "Bad looks" is subjective and certain attributes like quick weight gain would actually help people survive in nature. Balding is a reflection of the fact that hair serves no evolutionary purpose. We have lost our fur because we don't need it. Thus, that women reject balding men despite the genetic neutrality of baldness shows that their preferences are often invalid. Women's perceptions and norms of attractiveness seem confused and to evaluate genetic fitness by inaccurate stereotypes.
 
Last edited:
most people are ugly cuz of their mother genes
 
What does "bottom of the barrel genes" mean? Being ugly or short? I do not believe that either of these is a good metric on male value and worthiness to reproduce. I think this is a terrible argument.
Bad genes usually means your ugly/short tho
 
I thought in the this brave new world we support equality. What happened liberals?. Are you telling me that equality isn't real and prejudice based on biological level isn't merely a social construct and y'all no different than natzees? Well. I'll be damned...
 
Shitty argument, does not fly. A typical sub 50 IQ IncelTears argument.

1. Your argument violates the concept of equity/fairness. There are many foids (I would say most foids) who are ugly as fuck and still breeding like rats. Take a picture of any of them and pass through "male filter" on some app like FaceApp, you'll see most of them are ugly (or average). So just stopping ugly males from reproducing is not going to change anything. If ugly ass foids can reproduce then we should be able to do as well.

2. Also, having sex does not mean you have to reproduce. Sexual gratification is one of the most basic biological needs of an animal.
This, both points pretty much sum up what I'd have said.

I have no intention to reproduce, yes it is indeed good that I won't, now how exactly does that help me? Am I supposed to just deal with this? If this argument is being made from a position of truly caring about others, then why does nobody care about finding a solution for us?

I can't even buy a shotgun to kill myself with, as I have been taken to the psych ward before involuntarily, meaning that if I want to choose a reliable suicide method, it's going to at least be either uncomfortable or scary. It feels as if normies just love to see us suffer tbh.
 
Incels will always exist as long as ugly foids are allowed to procreate. Since men have lower standards than women, this is why ugly foids can reproduce and women are too low iq to think about the possible remafications of them reproducing. So the argument by the op is completely null and void.
Tbh
 
It isn't because there are plenty of ugly foids too who reproduce and create a new generation of us.If they think we shouldn't reproduce,ugly foids shouldn't either
That's the problem with the argument.
Only ugly men are the ones who aren't supposed to reproduce.

Meanwhile ugly women create incel children
 
I have seen the argument made that we are just bottom of the barrel genes that shouldn't reproduce anyway. That by us not reproducing the human species is better off. Do you think this is a convincing argument? why or why not
It's literally human right:

Article 16 1. Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. ~ Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Every piece of shit who uses this argument deserves a death by impaling.
 
It’s not “right” per se but that’s how sexual selection works (at least on the male side of things)
 
Better chads not reproduce, outdated mammoth hunters
 
Females are the selectors... that's it, over.
 
it isn't a good argument because even if that were true how does that change the fact that we are involuntary celibates? it doesn't change a single thing?
 
Ok, so what do they want us do then? Go kill yourself, shut up and wageslave, betabuxx and hope it works? How different and unique. Even if it is justified for some reason, it adds nothing to the discussion. And at the same time clearly shows the hypocrisy the society that is supposed to be humane, supporting or strive to equality, really professes. Some of us are not born to have happy lives. It's okay to be incel, you just got unlucky with your bone structure and will suffer because of that for the rest of your life.
 
Women will create more incels
 
It isn't because there are plenty of ugly foids too who reproduce and create a new generation of us.If they think we shouldn't reproduce,ugly foids shouldn't either
 
by that logic only the top 10% should fuck and they should be making 10 babies each
 
I have seen the argument made that we are just bottom of the barrel genes that shouldn't reproduce anyway. That by us not reproducing the human species is better off. Do you think this is a convincing argument? why or why not
Women who swallow Anti-Baby-Pills like Tik-Tacs and flush unborn life down the drain if the rearing would inhibit their ability to party/fuck chads are in no position to make appeals to nature, furthermore nature/martial law knows no morality, but they flee into the comfort zone of morality as soon as they need it (for example: Wumyn are so oppressed, pls give me free gibs and shieet). They want the law of the strongest whenever it benefits them and argue for societal comfort/morality/lenience when something doesn't benefit them.
Women will create more incels
This.
 
It isn't because there are plenty of ugly foids too who reproduce and create a new generation of us.If they think we shouldn't reproduce,ugly foids shouldn't either
 
The fact our genes have made it through history to us is proof these genes should be good enough to be passed on. Case closed.
 
Ugly foids will still reproduce and create more incels
 

Similar threads

Below Human
Replies
23
Views
467
erenyeager
erenyeager
Yabadadabadoo
Replies
14
Views
1K
DreamCoper
DreamCoper
Stupid Clown
Replies
5
Views
490
the kurdish loner
the kurdish loner
AtrociousCitizen
Replies
39
Views
1K
NIGGER BOJANGLES
NIGGER BOJANGLES
fullofchagrin
Replies
29
Views
664
pizzamaxxer
pizzamaxxer

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top