FukkenLoser
SRK - Captain
-
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2018
- Posts
- 1,547
Every single possible action a woman takes is for attention. Prove me wrong
water is wet
To be fair, he did ask to be disproven...however unreasonable it is to ask someone to disprove the social equivalent of 2+2=4.water is wet
To be fair, he did ask to be disproven...however unreasonable it is to ask someone to disprove the social equivalent of 2+2=4.
water is wet
2+2=4.
In my experience, it is male attention that females most crave. They feed off of the sense of power men give them. They feel more alive. It's like crack for them. So much so, that when she's in the middle of putting on "the moves" to get Chad's attention, and he ignores her anyway, it psychologically crushes her.That makes no sense. Women do not try, nor do they need to, to get male attention. Male attention is free. Women can wear no makeup or clothing and still get male attention.
Without female attention women wither. Everything a woman does is for securing a man to work for her or to get female attention.
Wanting chad dick is not equivalent to women seeking male attention. Women want chad dick for sex and they want to have chad work for them through marriage. This lust for chad and having him work for her is not at all the same thing as seeking male attention.
Seeking male attention implies finding value in male attention and there is nothing a woman values less than male attention. Like I have said, male attention is a free commodity which women can get from any man at any time.
Women like Kardashian, Hilton etc. dress up and do things for female attention only. Do you really believe that men care about women's clothing and fashion? Only women care about such things (aside from the men who design the fashion they consume). If women wanted male attention they would not need to do anything at all to get it. Men actively compete with each other in order to give women attention, that is how worthless male attention is to women.
Can't tbhProve me wrong
I agree. Maybe you could take some time to reply to my post instead of telling me bluepilled nonsense like:
I will be happy to explain to you exactly why this is a bluepilled nonsense statement if you will indulge me and attempt to reply to my previous post, either disagreeing or agreeing with specific points. I was seriously trying to respond to you but now I feel like you are not worth it.
I fundamentally disagree with your premise that women do not value even common male attention. This is why I did not address it directly as such, but was trying instead to re-frame the context of conversation to eventually get you at least peripheral access to a larger view, through future posts building toward it, using that particular post as a stepping stone.
In any event, we may be too distant in perspective to meet with any kind of middle ground. And that is fine. To each their own.
Pertinent insight.The more male attention a foid has (even from incels) the more attractive she is to Chad.